Rinku Sharma murdered for collecting funds for Ram Mandir!

[PunterLog]

4 minutes ago, urbestfriend said:

Here comes one libbu  who says BJP/RSS killed rinku sharma This is what is being spread in Pakistan. 

 

 

 

So, BJP made 14 Muslims to stab Rinku Sharma to create Hindu Muslim divide?

 

I knew inbreeding has side-effects, I just didn't know it was this bad.

[maniac]

@Yoda-esque if we ever become undivided india Maharashtra will be South India too. In fact Maharashtra is largely bordered by 2 South Indian states. Don’t know what exactly you mean when you generalize “South India”

 

By the way the Marathas were the admins for Krishna Deva Raya empire. The man who kept away islamic invasion from the Deccan.

 

So not sure where you get your history lessons from.

[Yoda-esque]

[mention=14415]Yoda-esque[/mention] if we ever become undivided india Maharashtra will be South India too. In fact Maharashtra is largely bordered by 2 South Indian states. Don’t know what exactly you mean when you generalize “South India”

 

By the way the Marathas were the admins for Krishna Deva Raya empire. The man who kept away islamic invasion from the Deccan.

 

So not sure where you get your history lessons from.

I didn't even mention marathas..

 

Not sure what marathas being administrators of any empire had to do with my earlier point that south didn't rebel against much the islamists.I stand by that opinion which is supported by facts.

 

If Aurangzeb had come down south,it would be a completely different place.The nizams were tame by comparison.

 

 

 

[maniac]

7 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

I didn't even mention marathas..

Not sure what marathas being administrators of any empire had to do with my earlier point that south didn't rebel the islamists much.I stand by that opinion which is supported by facts.

If Aurangzeb had come down south,it would be a completely different place.The nizams were tame by comparison.
 

You have to thank Krishna Deva Raya who ruled South,West and parts of East for that to keep them away for as long as he did. 
 

what rebellion are you talking about, it’s north that got partitioned. In fact you should be asking why we shove Qutub Minar and Tajmahal as great inidian architecture while ignoring all those ancient marvelous temples of the South.

 

Firstly what is your definition of “south” there are 5 South Indian states with their own indigenous traditions and customs. South is only a direction. 
 

Maharahstra and Orissa fall under South as well if the history had been a little different.

 

It comes across as generic and ignorant, when you generalize. The same thing you accuse the leftists of doing.

 

Also what exactly is your benchmark for rebellion?

 

Andhra,TN Muslims actually are much ingrained in the local culture than their norther counterparts. Sure things are changing with all the funding but I have met Andhra Muslims who can recite poems in Telugu that would put scholars to shame.

 

Your question is very chai pe charcha type generalization than backed by any constructive analysis. 

Edited February 20, 2021 by maniac

[Yoda-esque]

You have to thank Krishna Deva Raya who ruled South,West and parts of East for that to keep them away for as long as he did. 
 
what rebellion are you talking about, it’s north that got partitioned. In fact you should be asking why we shove Qutub Minar and Tajmahal as great inidian architecture while ignoring all those ancient marvelous temples of the South.
 
Firstly what is your definition of “south” there are 5 South Indian states with their own indigenous traditions and customs. South is only a direction. 
 
Maharahstra and Orissa fall under South as well if the history had been a little different.
 
It comes across as generic and ignorant, when you generalize. The same thing you accuse the leftists of doing.
 
Also what exactly is your benchmark for rebellion?
 
Andhra,TN Muslims actually are much ingrained in the local culture than their norther counterparts. Sure things are changing with all the funding but I have met Andhra Muslims who can recite poems in Telugu that would put scholars to shame.
 
Your question is very chai pe charcha type generalization than backed by any constructive analysis. 

Okay Saar,believe what you want.South Indians are very brave.I am out of this discussion.

[maniac]

4 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

13 minutes ago, maniac said:

You have to thank Krishna Deva Raya who ruled South,West and parts of East for that to keep them away for as long as he did. 
 
what rebellion are you talking about, it’s north that got partitioned. In fact you should be asking why we shove Qutub Minar and Tajmahal as great inidian architecture while ignoring all those ancient marvelous temples of the South.
 
Firstly what is your definition of “south” there are 5 South Indian states with their own indigenous traditions and customs. South is only a direction. 
 
Maharahstra and Orissa fall under South as well if the history had been a little different.
 
It comes across as generic and ignorant, when you generalize. The same thing you accuse the leftists of doing.
 
Also what exactly is your benchmark for rebellion?
 
Andhra,TN Muslims actually are much ingrained in the local culture than their norther counterparts. Sure things are changing with all the funding but I have met Andhra Muslims who can recite poems in Telugu that would put scholars to shame.
 
Your question is very chai pe charcha type generalization than backed by any constructive analysis. 

Okay Saar,believe what you want.South Indians are very brave.I am out of this discussion.

WTF do you mean by that? 

[maniac]

Not taking digs at any region but the North got partitioned into a different country-Punjab and beyond  

 

The west did- Karachi/Sindh

 

The East did- Bangladesh

 

 how come South is being blamed for not fighting Muslims 

[nikred]

Not taking digs at any region but the North got partitioned into a different country-Punjab and beyond  
 
The west did- Karachi/Sindh
 
The East did- Bangladesh
 
 how come South is being blamed for not fighting Muslims 

Yeah, South Indians have been very timid. How else would you explain the Islamic Republic of Hyderabad right in middle of India. Bloody Southies gave Nizams the region on a platter.

Sent from my SM-M315F using Tapatalk

[Vilander]

6 hours ago, Yoda-esque said:

6 hours ago, maniac said:

You have to thank Krishna Deva Raya who ruled South,West and parts of East for that to keep them away for as long as he did. 
 
what rebellion are you talking about, it’s north that got partitioned. In fact you should be asking why we shove Qutub Minar and Tajmahal as great inidian architecture while ignoring all those ancient marvelous temples of the South.
 
Firstly what is your definition of “south” there are 5 South Indian states with their own indigenous traditions and customs. South is only a direction. 
 
Maharahstra and Orissa fall under South as well if the history had been a little different.
 
It comes across as generic and ignorant, when you generalize. The same thing you accuse the leftists of doing.
 
Also what exactly is your benchmark for rebellion?
 
Andhra,TN Muslims actually are much ingrained in the local culture than their norther counterparts. Sure things are changing with all the funding but I have met Andhra Muslims who can recite poems in Telugu that would put scholars to shame.
 
Your question is very chai pe charcha type generalization than backed by any constructive analysis. 

Okay Saar,believe what you want.South Indians are very brave.I am out of this discussion.

What attitude is this seriously you will generalise all south Indians because you are butt hurt with some poster in a freaking cricket forum is it. You are not yoda you are a dodo. Lol. 

 

[Vilander]

5 hours ago, nikred said:

 

 

Yeah, South Indians have been very timid. How else would you explain the Islamic Republic of Hyderabad right in middle of India. Bloody Southies gave Nizams the region on a platter.

Sent from my SM-M315F using Tapatalk
 

 

So you mean people should have been thrown into the sea. Lol 

[Vilander]

6 hours ago, maniac said:

WTF do you mean by that? 

He thinks since he is a 5 foot limp gujju he is some super hero thats what it means. . Lots of Gobar super powa from eating lots of Khaas poos.

[Yoda-esque]

He thinks since he is a 5 foot limp gujju he is some super hero thats what it means. . Lots of Gobar super powa from eating lots of Khaas poos.

Ooh lemurian triggered!!

 

Me so scared ..

 

 

 

[Yoda-esque]

What attitude is this seriously you will generalise all south Indians because you are butt hurt with some poster in a freaking cricket forum is it. You are not yoda you are a dodo. Lol.     

 

Looks like you aren't good at comebacks..you need to work on them a little..this is what kids in second and third grade say..tch tch  

BTW,You seem to be very interested in body shapes and sizes.

 

Anyways I am done with this thread.Enjoy your juvenile fantasies!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[coffee_rules]

On the OP,

 

Even women are involved, the whole neighborhood has to be arrested 

[coffee_rules]

On 2/16/2021 at 5:40 PM, Tibarn said:

 

Shri Aurobindo was so based.

Did you mean based or biased? 

[Tibarn]

6 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Did you mean based or biased? 

I meant based; I was using the slang meaning of the term:

Quote

The quality of having an opinion without regard for what other people think, often a controversial opinion but not always.

 

The quote Ashish read from Shri Aurobindo is basically calling out the trend of Indians of his era (and of modern times as well unfortunately) of just arguing/complaining about everything and never taking action. As if outrage itself is some sort of worthwhile action. Speaking about things of course has its place, but not following up with actions results in minimal gains on issues one supposedly cares about.  Then again, maybe I am being unfair to us modern Indians, we have been brainwashed since childhood that some guy doing stupid marches, hunger strikes, and kadi ninda "won" us "freedom." 

 

In contrast, the Japanese just speak truthfully and do their duty, both without pointless emotionality; the same way the Gita tells us to behave, yet we have forgotten it.   

Edited February 23, 2021 by Tibarn

[donkey]

On 2/11/2021 at 11:35 PM, PunterLog said:

 

If the lynching had been the other way around, Indian media would have promoted the communal angle. Maintaining peace isn't the objective of the media, if anything peace is bad for media.

 

A lot of so called "beef" lynchings aren't really beef lynchings but "cattle theft" lynchings i.e thieves get lynched when they try to steal a cow from a poor farmer who depends on it for his survival.

 

Quote

Huh is there even a shred of doubt in your mind about that?

Kejriwal went and met some the victims family when that fake lynching incident happened..I bet he won't go to meet now.

Because of effetes in Delhi who want free bijli paani and have been taken for a ride .There are a few aaptards here as well disguised as farmers

 

Our leftist media is biased against the majority community for sure. I don't mind them keeping the communal tension under check but why not exercise the same level of restraint when the roles are reversed. Less we talk about Delhi CM the better, just when I thought he couldn't stoop any lower.

Edited February 25, 2021 by donkey