Jump to content

Activist Disha Ravi arrested over protest 'toolkit' shared by Greta Thunberg


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Yoda-esque said:
3 hours ago, mishra said:
Bail is not acquital. Police made arrest because it felt it got a case. Tomorrow, if legal system send her to prison don’t blame the gvmnt.
 
BTW, message has been sent, govmnt is watching if you collaborate with ISI.

Exactly,putting her in jail was never the motive.But some fools might think twice before attempting such stunts in the future.

I see how you guys think. Anyone who does not think like you needs to go to jail.

Posted
Not all...especially not people like Justice Bobde...many Judges are sell outs in India judiciary system.
Ok ,so you only believe the verdicts that your favor ?

Next question, are you in favor of arresting these baboons that attacked the crowds and hoisted flags?
Posted
4 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:
30 minutes ago, Khota said:
I see how you guys think. Anyone who does not think like you needs to go to jail.

Do you think the people who hoisted those flags need to be in jail?

Yes.

 

Do you think putting journalists in jail is the righ thing?

Do you really think Dsha is out to destroy India?

Posted
Yes.
 
Do you think putting journalists in jail is the righ thing?
Do you really think Dsha is out to destroy India?
She was taken in for questioning is the way I see it The police were never going to arrest her.

If she was so innocent,why was she scared about having her name in that document? And what was she doing cavorting with that SFJ group or whatever is called?
Posted

The fact is that ,had the republic day riots not happened, she wouldn't be taken in.But police found some credible link to what she was organizing and whatever happened.They did their job.

 

Hopefully people will think twice before trying to defame the country the next time.

 

Let people know that it's not okay to plan such riots and get away with it.

 

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:
1 hour ago, Khota said:
spacer.png
 
This girl looks like a threat to a nation of billion people. I agree.

Are you saying that someone who looks blissful and innocent is above suspicion?

Are you saying anyone who does not think like you should be in jail?

Posted
53 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

She was taken in for questioning is the way I see it The police were never going to arrest her.

If she was so innocent,why was she scared about having her name in that document? And what was she doing cavorting with that SFJ group or whatever is called?

What do you call holding someone against their will?

 

You bring the might of a government against ordinary citizen they wil all wilt. Happens all the time.

Posted
Are you saying anyone who does not think like you should be in jail?
Is that the answer to what I asked?

Just because I feel someone should be in jail doesn't mean that they are guilty or not guilty.

IMO ,anyone found cavorting with anti national groups like SFJ and causing unrest that results in deaths and riots
should be a candidate for questioning at least.

This would happen in western countries as well.
Posted
28 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

Is that the answer to what I asked?

Just because I feel someone should be in jail doesn't mean that they are guilty or not guilty.

IMO ,anyone found cavorting with anti national groups like SFJ and causing unrest that results in deaths and riots
should be a candidate for questioning at least.

This would happen in western countries as well.

Just for your reference dissent is not a punishable offense.

Posted
5 hours ago, Khota said:

I see how you guys think. Anyone who does not think like you needs to go to jail.

So you do accept that its very likely that she will end up in prison.

Posted
4 hours ago, mishra said:

So you do accept that its very likely that she will end up in prison.

She will not because world is watching. You maybe happy but there is a limit to this.

Posted
Just for your reference dissent is not a punishable offense.
Not punishable but can be investigated at the very least.

At what point do you think is it okay to start investigating something like this?
After public property is destroyed ? After people are killed?
×
×
  • Create New...