Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

So if a Hamas rocket ends up hitting in school in Southern Israel, Israel should target a school in the Gaza Strip?

 

Would that be considered a proportional response as it is "eye for eye"?

 

One side reacted to police violence. Other side seized and turned into a full scale war.  If Palestine had one of the best airforce in the world and launched similar attack Israel would have retreated for sure. But they know palestine is defenceless.

Posted
3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

One side reacted to police violence. Other side seized and turned into a full scale war.  If Palestine had one of the best airforce in the world and launched similar attack Israel would have retreated for sure. But they know palestine is defenceless.

 

That doesn't answer the question of what is a proportionate response to Hamas rocket attacks?

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Israel has one of the strongest air force in the world. Israeli police started it.  So they reacted.  This war was totally avoidable. But Netanyahu wanted it. Even now he can de-escalate. Is he doing that? No. 

 

 

So, how many jews live in Palestine? Zero.

How many jews can actually live in Palestine  in future? Zero

 

but there is good number of Palestinians living in Israel with better life then Palestine. But what they do? Attack Police, Riot in streets? And breed. Because that all they can do. So proportaly, Israel can expel them all. 
 

Palestine is using everything thing they can to kill Jews but Israel is doing targeted. Proportionatel, Israel should also throw all its might? Shouldn’t it?

 

Palestine stops Rockets, war will stop.

Edited by mishra
Posted
12 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

One side reacted to police violence. Other side seized and turned into a full scale war.  If Palestine had one of the best airforce in the world and launched similar attack Israel would have retreated for sure. But they know palestine is defenceless.

Do you know that violence started with Palestinian terrris ramming his car into Israeli Police. Good that it wasn’t indian media which would have called it peacefull farmer protesting has overturned his tractor because of fascist Modi

Posted
9 minutes ago, mishra said:

Do you know that violence started with Palestinian terrris ramming his car into Israeli Police. Good that it wasn’t indian media which would have called it peacefull farmer protesting has overturned his tractor because of fascist Modi

 

No . You got it backwards. It was police eviction that triggered the chain of events.

Posted
2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

No . You got it backwards. It was police eviction that triggered the chain of events.

You don’t pay rent, you get evicted. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, mishra said:

So, how many jews live in Palestine? Zero.

How many jews can actually live in Palestine  in future? Zero

 

but there is good number of Palestinians living in Israel with better life then Palestine. But what they do? Attack Police, Riot in streets? And breed. Because that all they can do. So proportaly, Israel can expel them all. 
 

Palestine is using everything thing they can to kill Jews but Israel is doing targeted. Proportionatel, Israel should also throw all its might? Shouldn’t it?

 

Palestine stops Rockets, war will stop.

 

 Protest was to opposing eviction of the families.  Not to start a war. It got escalated quickly. Israel destroyed 40 schools,  20 medical facilities and 4 or 5 hospitals and about 100 buildings.  

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

 Protest was to opposing eviction of the families.  Not to start a war. It got escalated quickly. Israel destroyed 40 schools,  20 medical facilities and 4 or 5 hospitals and about 100 buildings.  

Who can discredit Israeli claim that there were either terrorist or ammunition in those buildings?

 

Yasir Arafat was last crediworthy man Palestine had. After him, Terrorists Hamas  took over nation. So if Terrorist Hamas says Israels claim is wrong, why would anyone in right mind believe him.

Posted
4 minutes ago, mishra said:

You don’t pay rent, you get evicted. 

 

The United Nations Commission for Human Rights has called the forced removal of Palestinian families a potential war crime. Israeli officials have called it a "real-estate dispute between private parties.  

Posted
Just now, mishra said:

Who can discredit Israeli claim that there were either terrorist or ammunition in those buildings?

 

Yasir Arafat was last crediworthy man Palestine had. After him, Terrorists Hamas  took over nation. So if Terrorist Hamas says Israels claim is wrong, why would anyone in right mind believe him.

 

An independent panel has to determine that. Certainly not Israelis.

Posted
4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

An independent panel has to determine that. Certainly not Israelis.

And most certainly not Hamas?

Posted
1 minute ago, mishra said:

And most certainly not Hamas?

Both have the motive to be lying about it. No denying that. But automatically taking the side of Israelis for political and other reasons is not right.

Posted
17 minutes ago, mishra said:

You don’t pay rent, you get evicted. 

 

They were the owners of the land, but Israel didn't accept the International Law and introduced it's own apartheid laws. 

 

This is the great injustice, but off course right wing Media Houses don't show the actual truth. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

One side reacted to police violence. Other side seized and turned into a full scale war.  If Palestine had one of the best airforce in the world and launched similar attack Israel would have retreated for sure. But they know palestine is defenceless.


do you know why police reacted to those in mosque? Every year during Ramadan including this year. Such individual attacks were happening targeting women and children. They had enough. Also, this year some Muslim and Jewish holiday coincided and Al-Aqsa mosque was hijacked by both parties. Don’t go by who started it, it will always lead to pointing fingers we have no knowledge about. When police went into the mosque to control protesters, Hamas gave an ultimatum and started firing rockets. They could have  avoided clashes if they hadn’t fired rockets over a random mosque protest. Every rocket fired will be responded with air strikes. Simple strategy.

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Both have the motive to be lying about it. No denying that. But automatically taking the side of Israelis for political and other reasons is not right.

You have a situation where one side(Jews) are relying on system and administration like kashmiri Pandits in kashmir while other side , every individual civilian ( atleast 90%) is driven by hate and is ready to brutally lynch kill , rape , burn, stone to death on a single opportunity. But you choose to call people relying on system as agressor while other side is poor civilian. Other side is sick. Simply sick people and deserve no sympathy 

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Nothing to do with Osama. Even without Osama he was going to win.  He got Romney's clock cleaned. Not like he was in any trouble at all.

 

A lot of fence-sitters jumped after that, plus a movie with oscars helps too. A closer win like Bush's 2 victories became a resounding victory with mandate for drone policy

Posted
26 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

They were the owners of the land, but Israel didn't accept the International Law and introduced it's own apartheid laws. 

 

This is the great injustice, but off course right wing Media Houses don't show the actual truth. 

Says who? All the jews were born on mars and brought in to Hitler to be gasses on inter planetary mission. Man, Jewish civilisation  too deserve some pace on this earth. Think on human side of your brain instead of allways siding with Islamic followers.

Posted
5 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

 

A lot of fence-sitters jumped after that, plus a movie with oscars helps too. A closer win like Bush's 2 victories became a resounding victory with mandate for drone policy

Obama was never under threat. If anything that tanked Romoney probably his 47% comment. Besides. far right wing loonies were looking for a loony like Trump not a run of the mill conservative like Romney.  Tea party was a big movement on the right. The alt right group was looking for a lunatic not a guy like Romney.

Posted
5 hours ago, mishra said:

You have a situation where one side(Jews) are relying on system and administration like kashmiri Pandits in kashmir while other side , every individual civilian ( atleast 90%) is driven by hate and is ready to brutally lynch kill , rape , burn, stone to death on a single opportunity. But you choose to call people relying on system as agressor while other side is poor civilian. Other side is sick. Simply sick people and deserve no sympathy 

 

 Both sides are sick in their own way. I don't think India took a side either. 

 

https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/israel-or-palestine-who-did-india-support-at-the-united-nations-and-why-1621340459-1

×
×
  • Create New...