R!TTER Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 To India's total in the first innings? Link to comment
maniac Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Not that it will get votes but where is Pujara option? Link to comment
R!TTER Posted June 22, 2021 Author Share Posted June 22, 2021 You mean in terms of "actual" score (team's) or the number of overs we lasted? I'd say even if he lasted 100 overs we might've scored at most 50 more Link to comment
putrevus Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 none, no Indian batsman was likely to get a hundred on this wicket in first innings. Only Jadeja should have scored 20 odd more given he had license to go after bowling at that stage. Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 no doubt ..... Pujara in the 1st inns ... failed miserably at what he is 'supposed to be very good at'... If he scored at least some 40 odd by consuming a bit more number of balls , the scenario currently would have been lot different... Link to comment
putrevus Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said: no doubt ..... Pujara in the 1st inns ... failed miserably at what he is 'supposed to be very good at'... If he scored at least some 40 odd by consuming a bit more number of balls , the scenario currently would have been lot different... So as a batsman is he supposed to score in every innings, coffee_rules 1 Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 Rahane brain fart caused about 50 runs in the end. Rest had backup, Rahane’s had none raki05 1 Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 9 hours ago, putrevus said: So as a batsman is he supposed to score in every innings, pathetic record in SENA + WI is not the sign of a batsman who is supposed to even justify his place in the team let alone score in every inns. Link to comment
Lone Wolf Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 (edited) Rahane he Could have gone all guns blazing with Tail & looked assured against Kiwi bowlers until Wagner. That was just bad timing to get out. Edited June 23, 2021 by Lone Wolf coffee_rules 1 Link to comment
ShoonyaSifar Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 None of them. When the match started in those conditions,we we were willing to take 200 as a good score. Got 17 more than what we asked for, that's how difficult the conditions were. Link to comment
Serpico Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 2 hours ago, rtmohanlal said: pathetic record in SENA + WI is not the sign of a batsman who is supposed to even justify his place in the team let alone score in every inns. pathetic or not he is better than the alternatives and he gets into the team after kohli, rahane and pant. its not like we have a superior batsmen wasting away on the bench Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now