express bowling Posted November 16, 2021 Posted November 16, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Trichromatic said: Directly or indirectly ICC earning is not from IPL. BCCI earns more than they spend from non-IPL sources. Domestic structure is not funded by IPL. Total expenses of BCCI is approx Rs 1592 crores including IPL. Total non-IPL earning was approx Rs 1610 crores. Does not work that way. An organization's budgeted expenditure is decided based on it's total expected revenue. Saving have to be there. If the total revenue were to be reduced by 60% then the BCCI's total expenditure would come down significantly too. Moreover, a financial powerhouse like the BCCI's presence in international tournaments and series means that the the negotiation of contracts with the broadcasters are far more lucrative too. Most Indian broadcasters will like to keep the BCCI in good humour so that they get future contracts and future IPL contracts. Edited November 16, 2021 by express bowling kirkutfan, Mosher, Khota and 1 other 1 3
Trichromatic Posted November 16, 2021 Posted November 16, 2021 30 minutes ago, express bowling said: Does not work that way. An organization's budgeted expenditure is decided based on it's total expected revenue. Saving have to be there. If the total revenue were to be reduced by 60% then the BCCI's total expenditure would come down significantly too. Moreover, a financial powerhouse like the BCCI's presence in international tournaments and series means that the the negotiation of contracts with the broadcasters are far more lucrative too. Most Indian broadcasters will like to keep the BCCI in good humour so that they get future contracts and future IPL contracts. 1. Those expenses include IPL expenses. 2. While it's true that expected revenue determine the total expenditure, doesn't mean that BCCI would cut domestic expenses in same proportion without IPL. Earlier BCC was making much less and was spending higher % of amount for domestic matches resulting in lower savings. Now BCCI has increased their savings. IPL is funding savings mostly, not much domestic cricket. What was the amount BCCI transfers to state boards? What the cost of organizing domestic tournaments?
express bowling Posted November 16, 2021 Posted November 16, 2021 (edited) 59 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: 1. Those expenses include IPL expenses. Obviously. Quote 2. While it's true that expected revenue determine the total expenditure, doesn't mean that BCCI would cut domestic expenses in same proportion without IPL. Earlier BCC was making much less and was spending higher % of amount for domestic matches resulting in lower savings. Now BCCI has increased their savings. IPL is funding savings mostly, not much domestic cricket. What was the amount BCCI transfers to state boards? What the cost of organizing domestic tournaments? The quality of cricket infrastructure has improved tremendously across the country after the IPL has become a financial success. Earlier, the pay that domestic cricketers used to receive was abysmal. Now, it is much much better. Moreover, we see cricketers come from most parts of India now, barring the extreme North East. Which is partly due to the fact that they have better cricket infrastructure than 20 years back. Till the 1990s, most cricketers came from only a few bigger states and cities. The IPL is also encouraging more people to take up cricket as a career option in India. The only question that can be raised is whether the funds generated from the IPL are utilized to the fullest for the betterment of Indian cricket. I believe much more can be done. Edited November 16, 2021 by express bowling AuxiliA, sarchasm and Mariyam 1 2
urbestfriend Posted November 17, 2021 Posted November 17, 2021 23 hours ago, kirkutfan said: Then where does the ipl revenue go? It’s not like bcci has shareholders who pocket the gains. So if it is not going to operating expenses, maybe it’s going to capital expenditures like stadiums or it’s going to a reserve for future outlay. Either way, it is Indian cricket that benefits. Also, it is doubtful that the BCCI earmarks non ipl revenue for a specific purpose and ipl revenue for a specific purpose. More likely, it’s a big pool of revenue, part of which goes to fund operations, another part for capital expenditure, and yet another part to a reserve for future outlays. If we say that all are necessary, then of course ipl revenues are required to fund Indian cricket, including first class cricket. There is a reason why top politicians want to be in board...With BCCI, there is no accountability as such..There are one time expenditures like building stadium etc, but you dont see new stadiums being built every year. THere may be lot of leaking to political system and other stakeholders which is not well known..
rollingstoned Posted November 17, 2021 Posted November 17, 2021 35 minutes ago, urbestfriend said: There is a reason why top politicians want to be in board...With BCCI, there is no accountability as such..There are one time expenditures like building stadium etc, but you dont see new stadiums being built every year. THere may be lot of leaking to political system and other stakeholders which is not well known.. politicians trying to join bcci and state cricket boards has been a thing long before ipl, some royal family members too.
kirkutfan Posted November 18, 2021 Posted November 18, 2021 20 hours ago, urbestfriend said: There is a reason why top politicians want to be in board...With BCCI, there is no accountability as such..There are one time expenditures like building stadium etc, but you dont see new stadiums being built every year. THere may be lot of leaking to political system and other stakeholders which is not well known.. Feeding the politician is a necessary business expense. Not unique to the BCCI. But there are some plus points though. There was a time when BCCI actually paid the Government to have doordarshan broadcast cricket matches. From that to the BCCI getting a boat load of money from broadcasters for the right to show games- the BCCI has come a long way. The Ipl was a neat way to bring more fans to the game, unearth more talent, making sure that players are better compensated, even ex players getting pensions, ensuring better facilities for players, and a whole bunch of other things. Ipl has been a huge plus for Indian cricket.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now