Jump to content

Tuk Tuk ranking in Tests (last 2 years)


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

Posted

Actually present generation Ind batsman didn't played on pattas like last generation ind batsman.. This is the main reason for our batsman underperformance in tests.. 

Posted
11 hours ago, King6 said:

Actually present generation Ind batsman didn't played on pattas like last generation ind batsman.. This is the main reason for our batsman underperformance in tests.. 

 

They don't play at acceptable run rate even on batting friendly surfaces.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, King6 said:

Actually present generation Ind batsman didn't played on pattas like last generation ind batsman.. This is the main reason for our batsman underperformance in tests.. 

Atleast they performed under pressure ( VVS and Dravid and Sehwag) and Tendulkar played in 90s on turners.

 

Our current generation barely performs under pressure. Still can't believe how they threw away that South Africa series two times(2018 and 2021) and even England recently :facepalm:

Edited by Majestic
Posted

Strike rate is not necessary in Tests..

 

If you are playing like a Pant or Sehwag then its great or else 45,50,55,60 are all about same only.. Below 45 and above 65 makes a difference though in negative and positive ways both.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Atleast they performed under pressure ( VVS and Dravid and Sehwag) and Tendulkar played in 90s on turners.

 

Our current generation barely performs under pressure. Still can't believe how they threw away that South Africa series two times(2018 and 2021) and even England recently :facepalm:

Obviously 2000s batting lineup was best.. But this generation batsman(particularly indians) played mostly on bowling friendly pitches.. Laxman played 134 tests, out of 134 tests 46 tests was drawn.. Virat captained 68 tests, in 68 tests only 11 tests were drawn.. Recently home tests too worst for batsman 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Strike rate is not necessary in Tests..

 

If you are playing like a Pant or Sehwag then its great or else 45,50,55,60 are all about same only.. Below 45 and above 65 makes a difference though in negative and positive ways both.

 

Not necessary. But ultra defensive approach often allows bowlers to get settled without allowing the batsmen doing much of a damage. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Not necessary. But ultra defensive approach often allows bowlers to get settled without allowing the batsmen doing much of a damage. 

That's why I said Strike Rate below 45 has a negative effect.

Posted
35 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Not necessary. But ultra defensive approach often allows bowlers to get settled without allowing the batsmen doing much of a damage. 

Moreover, he doesn't even make it count by making big scores. Dravid also played defensively, but more often than not, when set, he made the bowlers pay. With Pujara, it is just blocking 60-70 balls, taking one or two blows on the body and then meekly plodding at one to the keeper. 

Posted
22 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Last 2 years is a good cut off point.  (500 balls min) We have entire batting top order in top 50. Rohit and agarwal 49 which is not overly terrible.

Look at Vihari and County Cricket Lion

 

 

tuktuk.jpg

 

Rohit with the best average and SR for an Indian here and yet gathers so much ridiculous hate

Posted
9 hours ago, sage said:

Rohit with the best average and SR for an Indian here and yet gathers so much ridiculous hate

He skips the difficult tours in tests. Phattu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...