Adamant Posted October 1, 2023 Share Posted October 1, 2023 34 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Rohit clearly mentioned he wanted someone who can bat a bit. Chahal brings absolutely nothing else to the table. The day he gets hit his usefulness ends. He generally misfields and doesn' go for catches. He doesn't bat. Can't bowl with wet ball. Read my post again, stats wise he has been the best spinner since 2015 in ODIs while this thread says that he is not international class which is as clueless as it gets, I know about his lack of utility but he has had a good career and can be proud of it. Link to comment
R!TTER Posted October 1, 2023 Share Posted October 1, 2023 Right, clearly taking the piss. View overall figures [change view] Opposition team Australia or Bangladesh or England or India or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or Sri Lanka Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2016 Type of bowler (by style) spin bowler Qualifications wickets taken greater than or equal to 50 Ordered by bowling average (ascending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 9 of 9 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5 Kuldeep Yadav (IND) 2017-2023 64 62 540.5 13 2909 112 6/25 25.97 5.37 28.9 6 2 YS Chahal (IND) 2017-2023 57 54 492.2 10 2655 90 6/42 29.50 5.39 32.8 3 2 A Zampa (AUS) 2016-2023 73 73 651.2 9 3624 118 5/35 30.71 5.56 33.1 8 1 Imran Tahir (SA) 2016-2019 50 49 438.0 14 2124 66 4/27 32.18 4.84 39.8 1 0 AU Rashid (ENG) 2016-2023 81 79 694.3 3 3938 122 4/36 32.27 5.67 34.1 6 0 T Shamsi (SA) 2016-2023 37 35 301.3 6 1689 50 5/49 33.78 5.60 36.1 2 1 Shadab Khan (PAK) 2017-2023 44 43 368.2 7 1995 50 4/38 39.90 5.41 44.2 1 0 MJ Santner (NZ) 2016-2023 75 71 584.2 12 2785 66 3/40 42.19 4.76 53.1 0 0 MM Ali (ENG) 2016-2023 80 75 577.4 9 3107 67 4/46 46.37 5.37 51.7 2 0 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted October 1, 2023 Share Posted October 1, 2023 Chahal in the last 3 yeasr has poor numbers. He did have a good phase where he and Kuldeep worked well in Tandem. But post pandemic his numbers were seriously piss poor Sundar 31.18 Chahal 38.55 Axar 49.00 Jadeja 51.72 Except other three can bat, Jaddu can field well. In order to be part of XI purely as a batsman with zero skills in other areas he has to be extraordinary like Shane warne who incidentally can hold a bat. Lord 1 Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted October 1, 2023 Share Posted October 1, 2023 1 hour ago, Adamant said: Let me clarify first that he is rightly dropped and Kuldeep is defo the right choice. Now lets see some stats Chahal averages 27 at eco of 5.27 and str rate of 30. 5w 2 times Lets see the corresponding stats for other supposedly GREAT spinners who according to ICFERS are on a different level to him : GOAT Adil Rashid Avg 32.4 eco 5.67 str rate 34.3 5w 2 times The modern great Adam Zampa Avg 29.3 eco 5.53 str rate 31.5. 5w 1 time Legend Shadab Khan Avg32, eco 5.17 str rate 38. 5w 0 times Tabraiz Shamsi Avg 32.5 str rate 35.5 eco 5.50. 5w 1 time Ish Sodhi Avg 36 str rate 39 eco 5.5 Okay but these are just regular loi stats, Chahal is useless in important tourneys and matches World cup 2019 stats (which was probably the worst world cup for spinners) Chahal avg 36 eco 5.97 GOAT Adil Rashid avg 48 eco 5.6 The modern great Adam Zampa avg 47 eco 7.11 Prodigy Rashid Khan avg 48 eco 5.7 Shadab avg 36 eco 5.5 Moeen ali avg 46 eco 5.4 Chahal is nowhere near being a great odi bowler or even a shoo - in our lineup but people are unnecessary hating on him bcoz of his off-field antics. If Chahal had a horrible ODI career then there is no other spinner in the world (since 2015) who had a good odi career, bcoz Chahal not only has better overall stats than them but also has better performances in the major event. The hate is unnecessary and he has had a fine career, infact I will go on to say that he had a better ODI career than any other spinner since 2015. Also, people may find it annoying and maybe even funny but Chahal is up there amongst the top three ODI spinners India has produced, I challenge all to refute this in any way possible (using stats and not hypothtetical scenarios) Good post in some ways. Indians, both fans and TM, overrate spinners way too much and end up picking too many in a squad. It's a mindset issue. We desperately want to be a pace heavy nation but keep picking even finger spinners for their bowling in this day and age for God knows what reason. And the only time we actually produce a decent spinner (relative to global standards), we trash him. The thing is, a team only needs 1 wrist spinner and Kuldeep is better right now. Against Top 6 sides in this World Cup cycle, Zampa averages 23 Kuldeep 31 Chahal 35 Adil Rashid - 37 Shamsi -33.4 So, Chahal has been there and thereabouts even against top sides though he has declined from before Adamant 1 Link to comment
The Realist Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Chahal no longer getting a BCCI central contract. Game over for the 34 year old? Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 He will now focus on beating Mgnus Carlsen Link to comment
Norman Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Still can't understand how this midget ended up playing as much international cricket as he did. That too most of the times over Kuldeep.. But then again, he's still somewhat better in one department than the likes of Mukesh, Bharath etc so I guess that checks out with our rudderless TM. Frustrated and Number 2 Link to comment
Need4Speed Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Norman said: Still can't understand how this midget ended up playing as much international cricket as he did. That too most of the times over Kuldeep.. But then again, he's still somewhat better in one department than the likes of Mukesh, Bharath etc so I guess that checks out with our rudderless TM. They needed someone to host Chahal TV Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 So @velu your twitter handle is Mahiyank? velu and Number 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now