Jump to content

Congrats Haris Rauf on beating Panayangara


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, MediumPacer said:

Typical hate for quick bowlers in india,just wanting them to fail.

 

I guess you can watch batsmen batting against dibbly dobbly all day

 

Bumrah is not dibbly dobbly lol Neither are Shami/Siraj.  DIbbly dobbly is hasan ali,  current Shaheen. This one is a brainless pacer with no skill.

Edited by vvvslaxman
Link to comment
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Bumrah is not dibbly dobbly lol Neither are Shami/Siraj.  DIbbly dobbly is hasan ali,  current Shaheen. This one is a brainless pacer with no skill.

Why does pacers have to be skillfully,batsmen like fakhar can hack his way to runs but pacers have to do everything perfectly.Conditions are too unhelpful for quick.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, MediumPacer said:

Why does pacers have to be skillfully,batsmen like fakhar can hack his way to runs but pacers have to do everything perfectly.Conditions are too unhelpful for quick.

It's unhelpful equally for everyone, still Indian quicks are causing havoc.

 

Had India played Mukesh, Bhuvi & Unadkut..they also would have been competing with Rauf, Shaheen & Hassan Ali in terms of runs.

Link to comment
15 hours ago, Iconoclast said:

His opening spell he bowls full to good lengths. But he does not target the stumps bowling 4th stump and moving the ball away. Good for getting edges and restricting runs but not bowled/lbw

I told the same during Asia Cup..he doesn't bowl close to stumps and try to stay away from batters arc.

 

It's a good skill for T20's as batters has to attack. But in ODI's batsman can wait for 2-3 overs and then pounce on him when the swing stops.

 

Same is the issue with Shaheen, he gets wicket because batters try to attack him in T20's and in process.."over attack" him.

In ODI's they can patiently find gaps without going bonkers.

 

Once swing disappears, their lack of skill with bowl is exposed.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, MediumPacer said:

Why does pacers have to be skillfully,batsmen like fakhar can hack his way to runs but pacers have to do everything perfectly.Conditions are too unhelpful for quick.

Very reason your pace is useful is because you can take pitch out of the equation. If you are going to depend on pitch what is the difference between you and Anderson?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

It's unhelpful equally for everyone, still Indian quicks are causing havoc.

 

Had India played Mukesh, Bhuvi & Unadkut..they also would have been competing with Rauf, Shaheen & Hassan Ali in terms of runs.

That's what i said, both are hacks ,yet it's favorable for one but not the other

Link to comment
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Another feather in the cap. Highest runs conceded by any bowler in a single world cup. He beat Madhushanka by 6 runs .533 runs.

Madushanka is the highest wicket taker ,and rauf also did well,he can't bowl with the new ball but probably the best old ball pacer in this wc.

 

Your comparison is like saying de kock has been dismissed the most in this wc.

Link to comment
On 11/7/2023 at 1:11 AM, Iconoclast said:

His pace makes 6 hitting easier for batsmen especially on these small grounds and flat tracks.

 

With that being said if he wants to continue in longer formats he had better learn some skills to go along with the pace.

 

I feel overall Pakistan's bowling coaches have not been doing a good job. Along with lack of skills there is a lack of a plan for both individual bowlers and the bowling unit as a whole.

I agree. I hope he continues in playing XI for next 20 years 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, MediumPacer said:

Madushanka is the highest wicket taker ,and rauf also did well,he can't bowl with the new ball but probably the best old ball pacer in this wc.

 

Your comparison is like saying de kock has been dismissed the most in this wc.

 

That is not comparison. That is called clutching at straws lol How can you compare runs with no. of dismissals. He was very expensive.  Poor average. Boult has bowled 81 overs concedd only 418 runs. Rauf 79 overs 533 runs.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

That is not comparison. That is called clutching at straws lol How can you compare runs with no. of dismissals. He was very expensive.  Poor average. Boult has bowled 81 overs concedd only 418 runs. Rauf 79 overs 533 runs.

Main bowlers will top the highest run list,even madhushaka is topping the list.

 

Rauf can't bowl with the new ball,without naseem he got exposed.It's like if the top order gets blown away then the middle order will get exposed to the new ball.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, MediumPacer said:

Main bowlers will top the highest run list,even madhushaka is topping the list.

 

Rauf can't bowl with the new ball,without naseem he got exposed.It's like if the top order gets blown away then the middle order will get exposed to the new ball.

 

Why are you dancing around instead of just admitting he is a crap bowler wiht no skill.  That Naseem shah is lucky not to play here. He would have disappeared all over.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...