Jump to content

Henry Kissinger (May 27 1923 - Nov 29 2023)


BacktoCricaddict

Recommended Posts

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/henry-kissinger-dominant-us-diplomat-cold-war-era-dies-aged-100-2023-11-30/

 

Quote

 

WASHINGTON, Nov 30 (Reuters) - Henry Kissinger, the most powerful U.S. diplomat of the Cold War era, who helped Washington open up to China, forge arms control deals with the Soviet Union and end the Vietnam War, but who was reviled by critics over human rights, has died aged 100.

Kissinger, a German-born Jewish refugee whose career took him from academia to diplomacy and who remained an active voice in foreign policy into his later years, died at his home in Connecticut on Wednesday, his geopolitical consulting firm, Kissinger Associates, said.

 

A memorial service will take place in New York, and Kissinger will be buried in Arlington National Cemetery just outside Washington, said a source familiar with the arrangements.

Kissinger was at the height of his powers during the 1970s in the middle of the Cold War when he served as national security adviser and secretary of state under Republican President Richard Nixon.

After Nixon's resignation in 1974 amid the Watergate scandal, he remained a diplomatic force as secretary of state under Nixon's successor, President Gerald Ford.

 

Kissinger was the architect of the U.S. diplomatic opening with China, landmark U.S.-Soviet arms control talks, expanded ties between Israel and its Arab neighbors, and the Paris Peace Accords with North Vietnam.

While many hailed Kissinger for his brilliance and statesmanship, others branded him a war criminal for his support for anti-communist dictatorships, especially in Latin America. In his latter years, his travels were circumscribed by efforts by some countries to arrest or question him about past U.S. foreign policy.

 

Discuss.

Edited by BacktoCricaddict
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most glossed-over aspect of Kissinger's career was him single-handedly torpedoing peace proposals between vietnam & USA in the early 70s, to get Richard Nixon elected (which he successfully did).

His biggest geo-strategic failure, was thinking that China would become more democratic as it became richer - as if the oil rich arab nations became more democratic in the decades of becoming rich or China ever had a problem throughout history being rich & autocratic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

The most glossed-over aspect of Kissinger's career was him single-handedly torpedoing peace proposals between vietnam & USA in the early 70s, to get Richard Nixon elected (which he successfully did).

His biggest geo-strategic failure, was thinking that China would become more democratic as it became richer - as if the oil rich arab nations became more democratic in the decades of becoming rich or China ever had a problem throughout history being rich & autocratic.

 

Supported my dictators  who killed lot of people. He still didn’t learn his lesson recently went to china repair the relationship.

Edited by gattaca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highly overrated.

 

Responsible for the genocide of so many Bangladeshis.

 

Evil, extremely unethical person.

 

Devoid of empathy, never cared how many people died because of his actions.

 

 

Edited by Khota
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khota said:

Highly overrated.

 

Responsible for the genocide of so many Bangladeshis.

 

Evil, extremely unethical person.

 

 

From my rudimentary understanding, he seemed to be bound by 2 ethical considerations:

 

(1) The state's self-interest is the only goal, and everything that is done should be done for that goal

(2) Pragmatism, not passion or idealism. While, in principle, this seems like a good idea, it takes humanity out of the equation while making foreign-policy decisions. And this drove the "enemy's enemy is friend" axiom.

 

He has written about Kautilya and seems to have been inspired by Arthashastra. Ironically, the problem from our perspective as PIOs is that - for whatever reason - Pakistan was designated a friend and India was the "enemy of friend." 

 

He obviously had a scheming mind and used it deviously, resulting in millions of people dying. I just cannot fathom such thinking where humans are seen as pawns to "achieve" some bigger goal. Maybe that's what leaders do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ravishingravi said:

Not a great man but every country would like him on their team. That's the world we live in. 

That sir is an Exhibit A that gives insight to your thinking.

 

No, I don't want him on my team. Never.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

From my rudimentary understanding, he seemed to be bound by 2 ethical considerations:

 

(1) The state's self-interest is the only goal, and everything that is done should be done for that goal

(2) Pragmatism, not passion or idealism. While, in principle, this seems like a good idea, it takes humanity out of the equation while making foreign-policy decisions. And this drove the "enemy's enemy is friend" axiom.

 

He has written about Kautilya and seems to have been inspired by Arthashastra. Ironically, the problem from our perspective as PIOs is that - for whatever reason - Pakistan was designated a friend and India was the "enemy of friend." 

 

He obviously had a scheming mind and used it deviously, resulting in millions of people dying. I just cannot fathom such thinking where humans are seen as pawns to "achieve" some bigger goal. Maybe that's what leaders do.

Doing the right thing serves your interests. 

 

Anyone who comes to a conclusion that Pakistan is better than India, needs to get his head examined.

 

Made millions of dollars from China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khota said:

Doing the right thing serves your interests. 

 

Anyone who comes to a conclusion that Pakistan is better than India, needs to get his head examined.

 

Made millions of dollars from China.

 

For warmongers, "doing the right thing" only applies to "doing the right thing" for your own state's citizens to keep them happy so there are no internal revolts. Even Arthashastra seems to state that. This does not apply to having the same sense of humanity for the citizens of another state; they are not your problem unless they become part of your state. 

 

For Kissinger, communism was evil and detrimental to the US' (his state's) self-interest. So, uprooting communism by any means was seen as necessary and, if millions of Vietnamese were killed along with 1000s of US soldiers, so be it. Despicable thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...