Jump to content

Joe Root - the stupidest shot in English test cricket history


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Frustrated said:

I m sure the Australian media will make the most fun out of it.   They are at their best when it comes to roasting the poms.  

 

They have, they have torn him apart.

 

What makes the shot terrible, is the context of the game.


England had their foot almost on India's throat at the start of play, 8 wickets in hand, no Ashwin meaning our bowlers had to bowl long spells.

 

They should have just waited a session before Bazball approach, so India's bowlers would be tired. They could have gone tuk tuk and still scored almost 100 runs in the session, which would have caused India a lot of problems.

Link to comment

Root best since Hutton?

 

He is certainly not better than people like Boycott - whose batting suffered late as his reflexes slowed and exploited by the mighty Windies attacks of the 70s and 80s. Still he was their number 1 target.

 

Boycott played most of his career against raging Aussie attacks with Lillee and co or South Africa led by Peter Pollock and the Windies greats. Most of his career without helmets.

 

Sadly at the end of his career Boycott could not handle the pace of Holding and co. Video quality not good......

 

 

Edited by AKane
Link to comment
2 hours ago, AKane said:

Root best since Hutton?

 

He is certainly not better than people like Boycott - whose batting suffered late as his reflexes slowed and exploited by the mighty Windies attacks of the 70s and 80s. Still he was their number 1 target.

 

Boycott played most of his career against raging Aussie attacks with Lillee and co or South Africa led by Peter Pollock and the Windies greats. Most of his career without helmets.

 

Sadly at the end of his career Boycott could not handle the pace of Holding and co. Video quality not good......

 

 

that's why I maintain that Barrington and Hutton were comfortably better than root. even Boycs, May, KP have a claim to be nearly on his level, though a bit lower (debatable).

Edited by Vijy
Link to comment
2 hours ago, AKane said:

Root best since Hutton?

 

He is certainly not better than people like Boycott - whose batting suffered late as his reflexes slowed and exploited by the mighty Windies attacks of the 70s and 80s. Still he was their number 1 target.

 

Boycott played most of his career against raging Aussie attacks with Lillee and co or South Africa led by Peter Pollock and the Windies greats. Most of his career without helmets.

 

Sadly at the end of his career Boycott could not handle the pace of Holding and co. Video quality not good......

 

 

Root is the best English batsman better than Boycott. Boycott had no attacking game. 
 

I have not seen Len Hutton or Ken Barington . Only guy to come close when right would be KP. KP had the talent but he was too much of a diva.

Edited by putrevus
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Root is the best English batsman better than Boycott. Boycott had no attacking game. 
 

I have not seen Len Hutton or Ken Barington . Only guy to come close when right would be KP. KP had the talent but he was too much of a diva.

agreed, regd KP. that's why I place him slightly below (ditto for May). No one on ICF has seen Hutton (one would need to be 70+), but I did get to see last few years of Barry (barrington). I place barry over root, but as I wrote in another post: root is a true ATG (to give him his due)

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Vijy said:

how is he even "arguably" the GOAT? even in post WW2 era, likes of hutton, compton, barrington are better than him comfortably. and KP and May are nearly his equal.

among the ones I saw, barrington was comfortably better than all Eng bats (did not see hutton & compton in post WW2).

How old are you bro lol haha. Unless you had tapes I guess

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Vijy said:

it only tells us he is much better than his contemporaries, which is not saying much because the other eng batters are very poor.

 

I am glad you at least admit root is not better than hutton. However, you don't know barrington's career much and have not seen him, so I would recommend reading up more on him. he had a complete game with attacking strokes, but had to focus chiefly on defense (especially overseas) to prop up his team.

 

In a nutshell, Barrington was much better than root. The latter did poorly in Aus (the "Great Enemy"), which cannot be said of barrington (even barry's "worst" away batting avg [in WI] is over 44). as someone who saw him, he was proficient vs spin, vs swing, and vs bounce. root has a weakness vs bounce, which Aus exploited despite Oz pitches being somewhat flat from mid-2000s until late 2010s (or even till 2020).

 

last, but not least, Barry had severe health issues (culminating in a heart attack at 37-ish), and still played with the courage of a lion. If Root had such issues, he would be at high risk to be struck on the heart, head, etc. remember that such blows were common in the era before helmets, and with unlimited bouncers allowed.

 

@Tattieboy could tell you more about the great Ken, IMO.

 

i still rate root higher than all but smith in this era, but there is no need for hyperbole.

I can't say much about Hutton or even Barrington (based on my reading some do rate Compton even higher than Barrington) but Root is definitely England's greatest batsman in last 50 years and that's an achievement itself. His performance in India tour of England 2021 was legendary scoring 750 runs with bat while the second one leading run scorer, Rohit Sharma, was sitting at 350 odd runs.

 

Additionally, he is a decent off spinner, so basically a Steve Waugh calibre bowler. In Australia, even the overrated Stokes failed too. Root was atleast the player of series in 2015 Ashes, hitting three hundreds with his bat and showing all round batting ability.

Edited by Majestic
Link to comment

Root has scored a lot of runs in New Zealand, South Africa, Sri Lanka and UAE. His record has been poor since Bazball effect came into force, meaning Root the batsman has been destroyed with this effect.

 

He was obviously a beast in England, not only averages 53 at home but has won test series vs India and Australia with standout performance and also scored plenty of runs vs other teams like South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand etc. The only question mark was his performance in Australia and now after the awful series he is having in India, he owes atleast one crucial knock by the end of the tour.

 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Root is the best English batsman better than Boycott. Boycott had no attacking game. 
 

I have not seen Len Hutton or Ken Barington . Only guy to come close when right would be KP. KP had the talent but he was too much of a diva.

Don't think that Boycott of late 70's and early 80's was the Boycott of ever.

 

In the Ray Illingworth tour of Aus in 1971 which England won by 299 runs (Sydney) - Snow taking 7/40 in I2, Boycott contributed as much as Snow in the win. He top scored for England in both innings - First inning he scored 77 in a session and 27 minutes. Very good. Second innings was sheet anchor with 142 no in 6 hours breaking the back of Aussies.

 

BATTING   R B M 4s 6s SR
c Gleeson b Connolly 77 147 140 11 0 52.38

 

BATTING   R B M 4s 6s SR
not out 142 360 412 12 0 39.44

 

.

He played many such innings vs Aus from 1964 to 1981 despite the break from 1971-77 when he refused to play under Denness as captain.

 

Yes it looked slow by today's standards but comparing to then it was not. Here is the drawn match where he scored fast when he had to in Adelaide and compare with Ian Chappell and Stackpole and his teammates

 

BATTING   R B M 4s 6s SR
run out 58 161 175 6 0 36.02
c Stackpole b Lillee 130 301 354 14 0 43.18
b Thomson 80 206 209 8 0 38.83

 

 

BATTING   R B M 4s 6s SR
not out 119 210 250 12 0 56.66

 

 

The Aussies did not bat much faster.

 

BATTING   R B M 4s 6s SR
b Snow 136 335 410 16 0 40.59
c †Knott b Willis 21 93 96 2 0 22.58
c Willis b Underwood 104 278 326 9 0 37.41
not out 21 109 114 0 0 19.26
not out 36 111 100 3 1 32.43

 

 

 

Boycott  averaged 47 vs Aus with 45 in Aus and 49 in England.  Gary Sobers in a similar period averaged 46 in Australia.

 

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Root has scored a lot of runs in New Zealand, South Africa, Sri Lanka and UAE. His record has been poor since Bazball effect came into force, meaning Root the batsman has been destroyed with this effect.

 

He was obviously a beast in England, not only averages 53 at home but has won test series vs India and Australia with standout performance and also scored plenty of runs vs other teams like South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand etc. The only question mark was his performance in Australia and now after the awful series he is having in India, he owes atleast one crucial knock by the end of the tour.

 

 

Root has a big blot. His Aus record. if he fixes it, he can outpace his contemporaries (barring smith) further.

 

however, my suspicion is that ASSball (bazball) will accelerate his downfall

Edited by Vijy
Link to comment
15 hours ago, Vijy said:

how is he even "arguably" the GOAT? even in post WW2 era, likes of hutton, compton, barrington are better than him comfortably. and KP and May are nearly his equal.

among the ones I saw, barrington was comfortably better than all Eng bats (did not see hutton & compton in post WW2).

 

you saw Barrington? :ohmy:

Link to comment
5 hours ago, AKane said:

From an Aussie in their message board - paraphrased.

 

"Root has bowled more overs than scored runs in India this series".

 

I checked and .... YES

 

Root has bowled around 94 overs.

Root has scored 70 runs.

by not having 3 frontline spinners in the team they are grounding down Roots body to be effctive as sa batsmen. Kohli, Williamson or Smith dont bowl now so why cant England not keep Root for sending 2/3 overs here and there rather than nearly 100 overs in 3 tests- its madness. Same way they destroyed Archers test career by bover bowling him in Tests

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...