Jump to content

ICC approves $70 million budget for hosting Champions Trophy in Pakistan

R!TTER

By R!TTER
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

R!TTER Grand Master

R!TTER

Posted
  • Author
Posted
55 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Don't worry... sirf Approve hua hai, payment nahin hui :biggrin:

If some reports are to be believed we received something like $140 million & chump change for the last WC held at home - this is less than half the matches, and a freakin CT not WC either :whack3:

56 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

There'll be lot of hidden clauses in there like Pak to play India in SL or Dubai :giggle:

So cost of hosting India in UAE is $35 million?

Ultimate_Game Grand Master

Ultimate_Game

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, cricketfan28 said:

So icci is not bcci ...

 

15 hours ago, New guy said:

But but but we are so tough on Pakistan now, especially in cricket. 

 

Neither has BCCI ever been equivalent of ICC nor have they focused on killing off Pak cricket. The only thing that matters to BCCI is money. That's about it.

 

If BCCI was the same as ICC it would've held WCT finals in India or at least one of them. And it would've ensure India somehow managed to win some of the ICC tourneys and we wouldn't have had to wait for a decade. The truth is BCCI doesn't have much of an influence other than the financial aspect of it. Hell, we couldn't even get that panauti of an umpire Kettleborough removed from our matches who was there for every ICC knockout defeat we suffered. Every ICC tourney has seen line decisions and umpire's call go against us. If we controlled ICC would that've happened?

 

Same with killing off Pak cricket. If India and BCCI really wanted to kill off Pak cricket, they would've done so already and made Pak pariah of world cricket. All India would've had to say was if any player plays in PSL they're ineligible to play in IPL. Or not toured the countries which tour Pak. There're so many ways India and BCCI could've hurt them. But BCCI really doesn't care. There's a huge difference between not caring, and actively destroying Pak cricket.

Edited by Ultimate_Game
Kron Grand Master

Kron

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

 

Neither has BCCI ever been equivalent of ICC nor have they focused on killing off Pak cricket. The only thing that matters to BCCI is money. That's about it.

 

If BCCI was the same as ICC it would've held WCT finals in India or at least one of them. And it would've ensure India somehow managed to win some of the ICC tourneys and we wouldn't have had to wait for a decade. The truth is BCCI doesn't have much of an influence other than the financial aspect of it. Hell, we couldn't even get that panauti of an umpire Kettleborough who was there for every ICC defeat. Every ICC tourney has seen line decisions and umpire's call go against us. If we controlled ICC would that've happened?

 

Same with killing off Pak cricket. If India and BCCI really wanted to kill off Pak cricket, they would've done so already and made Pak pariah of world cricket. All India would've had to say was if any player plays in PSL they're ineligible to play in IPL. Or not toured the countries which tour Pak. There're so many ways India and BCCI could've hurt them. But BCCI really doesn't care. There's a huge difference between not caring, and actively destroying Pak cricket.

Bcci care only about money.

 

You mentioned hwy wtc finals weren't held in India or Asia?

Money

 

Money in Britain is pounds. Brings more to the coffers of bcci. Which they will use to distribute to the other beggars in. The world like ecb and ca.

rkt.india Grand Master

rkt.india

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Jay Shah is a moron. 

What's Jay Shah to do with this? He is bcci secretary, not ICC.

Edited by rkt.india
Suhaan Grand Master

Suhaan

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

What's Jay Shah to do with this? He is bcci secretary, not ICC.

A source close to the ICC said on Thursday that the ICC’s financial and commerce committee, which is headed by Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) secretary Jay Shah, has approved the budget that was jointly prepared and submitted by the PCB and ICC’s finance department.

New guy Grand Master

New guy

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

What's Jay Shah to do with this? He is bcci secretary, not ICC.

So we have no say in ICC. Good to know. I think people should then stop chest thumping about BCCI's power and how now we have started getting firm on Pak and PCB.

 

If we have no power admit it instead of the constant useless chest thumping some people do. 

Edited by New guy
New guy Grand Master

New guy

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

A source close to the ICC said on Thursday that the ICC’s financial and commerce committee, which is headed by Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) secretary Jay Shah, has approved the budget that was jointly prepared and submitted by the PCB and ICC’s finance department.

Truth doesn't matter, the chest thumpers will keep thumping their chest on how now we are strict with PCB and are punishing them.

 

Meanwhile we are approving more money for them which will go into terrorist activities which will cost Indian lives. They are literally killing our soldiers in j&K and we are funding them generously.

 

Even Israel and Ukraine take better stands when attack against their countries happen. We are too weak to retaliate but now we are also approving millions for them as a reward for attacking our country. 

Edited by New guy
singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

I have never understood this statement, India vs Pak generate lot of revenue. I find it hard to believe Ind vs Eng doesn’t generate similar kind of revenue.

It's just a hoax created by ICC,

They usually increase the price tickets of India Pak games coz they know 100% of capable Pakistanis and majority of capable Indians will try their best to get the tickets.

 

In reality India vs Australia, India vs Eng & Ind vs NZ are much more competitive than this utopian rivalry. Pakistan promotes it obviously because they don't have anything else left in their country to keep them united. 

But India has no business in promoting this fake rivalry.

Edited by singhvivek141
singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

What's Jay Shah to do with this? He is bcci secretary, not ICC.

So Jay Shah has no say in protesting that majority of BCCI's revenue shouldn't go to PCB ?

 

He can voice his opinion, right ? That pay whatever you want to PCB but it shouldn't contain a single penny from BCCI.

 

 

Edited by singhvivek141
rkt.india Grand Master

rkt.india

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

So Jay Shah has no say in protesting that majority of BCCI's revenue shouldn't go to PCB ?

 

He can voice his opinion, right ? That pay whatever you want to PCB but it shouldn't contain a single penny from BCCI.

 

 

That's the budget of CT. That money isn't going to PCB. That money ICC will spend on organizing CT.

R!TTER Grand Master

R!TTER

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 hours ago, New guy said:

But but but we are so tough on Pakistan now, especially in cricket. 

We aren't & haven't ever been tough on Pak since at least 1971 - all this BS about Pak army needing India as an enemy applies to Indian political parties as well, especially BJP. Kashmir & Pak issue could've been resolved way back if they actually want to, this goes for both sides of the border! Anyone deluded into thinking that BJP is "tougher" on Pak needs to get a pysch eval done asap :whack3:

Gollum Grand Master

Gollum

Posted
Posted

Total 14 matches in CT, rotated in 2, max 3 venues, with some teams being stationed in one place for all group games. I just don't understand how this is half the budget of 2023 WC which had 50 games across 10 venues (and many warm ups as well). 

 

PCB swindling ICC/BCCI here and has Jay Shah's stamp of approval. Bloody traitor. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...