R!TTER Posted July 15, 2025 Posted July 15, 2025 2 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: In what way does 5-fer chasing adversely affect the team? When you're leaking runs! Which spray gun Siraj, IPL "over my dead body" Bumrah do of then enough BacktoCricaddict 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted July 15, 2025 Posted July 15, 2025 1 minute ago, R!TTER said: When you're leaking runs! Which spray gun Siraj, IPL "over my dead body" Bumrah do of then enough Like when you are insisting on bowling even when you are sucking wind because you are trying to get a 5th? Yeah, I can see that. But, in that case, the captain can say "effit" and hand the ball to another guy. But with century-chasing, it's all you. Unless of course Dravid is the captain and goes "eff your 200, we're done here!" Lord 1
bowl_out Posted July 15, 2025 Posted July 15, 2025 Wonder if milestone celebrations should be stopped. Treat getting to a 50 or 100 just like any other score
nevada Posted July 16, 2025 Posted July 16, 2025 On 7/15/2025 at 8:47 PM, BacktoCricaddict said: My goodness that was the most farcical landmark ever. Across format hundreds. Who the eff cares? Quitting at 99 centuries would have put him in exalted status similar to Bradman's 99.94 average. But no, he had to sink the team to get to the 100th! And remember that it was not just this game that was lost. For several months, talk of the 100th hundred was like a millstone around the team's neck, something the team would have done much better without. BacktoCricaddict 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted July 16, 2025 Posted July 16, 2025 17 hours ago, bowl_out said: Wonder if milestone celebrations should be stopped. Treat getting to a 50 or 100 just like any other score I don't think you can stop players from celebrating. But some maverick player should intentionally not care to celebrate, and this might get people thinking.
vvvslaxman Posted July 16, 2025 Author Posted July 16, 2025 2 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: I don't think you can stop players from celebrating. But some maverick player should intentionally not care to celebrate, and this might get people thinking. It is not celebrating purely. It is also acknowledging the crowd reaction to centuries. Generally they clap. No big deal. Pant doesn't care about 100. But he did celebrate in style
Lord Posted July 16, 2025 Posted July 16, 2025 18 hours ago, bowl_out said: Wonder if milestone celebrations should be stopped. Treat getting to a 50 or 100 just like any other score Its due to inclusion in stats which becomes criteria for judging players. No one asks how many 90s a player has scored though it has similar effect BacktoCricaddict and tapandrun 2
tapandrun Posted July 19, 2025 Posted July 19, 2025 Cricket as sports has a legacy of being not result oriented , it started as a sport where team would play for draws, only recently draws are not seen as favourable result. Hence the win/loss does never mattered , it was who did what, who scored , who took wkts. There was hardly any concept of playing for the team playing to win. And if once teams like Aus or Aus cricketing system started taking results seriously they changed the game and mind set. Aus player always kept their team 1st winning was what mattered the most. And team like Ind and eng who would not win most of the times (specially when cricket started televised in 90s ) they started focusing on personal milestones, score a useless 100 or a 50 say you showed the guts that was it. It was evident in this IPL too Stablished Ind player were celebrating a losing/near losing 100s like they have archived something big its just IPl and even then they are not playing any better than a newbie who are not celebrating a milestone like crazy. The objective is not to win but to have some kind of small personal milestone.
New guy Posted July 20, 2025 Posted July 20, 2025 On 7/16/2025 at 12:39 AM, BacktoCricaddict said: Like when you are insisting on bowling even when you are sucking wind because you are trying to get a 5th? Yeah, I can see that. But, in that case, the captain can say "effit" and hand the ball to another guy. But with century-chasing, it's all you. Unless of course Dravid is the captain and goes "eff your 200, we're done here!" Dravid did it for his own attention and power play, not out of any altruism. People are pretty naive. Gollum 1
New guy Posted July 20, 2025 Posted July 20, 2025 Who in the current team have this mentality? Rahul, who is still from old school. And perhaps Gill? Jadeja? Two of them will be gone soon. Jaiswal, pant, etc don't have this mentality Gollum 1
Lord Posted July 20, 2025 Posted July 20, 2025 10 hours ago, New guy said: Dravid did it for his own attention and power play, not out of any altruism. People are pretty naive. Why would he invite negative attention and criticism upon himself
vvvslaxman Posted July 20, 2025 Author Posted July 20, 2025 19 minutes ago, Lord said: Why would he invite negative attention and criticism upon himself prior to that series in the scG test Dravid had an opportunity to score a century in the 2nd innings. But India needed to bowl some overs in 4th evening. Roughly 4 overs. Dada declared 211/2 with Dravid on 91. Dravid was the hero in the previous test win. Lord 1
Lord Posted July 20, 2025 Posted July 20, 2025 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: prior to that series in the scG test Dravid had an opportunity to score a century in the 2nd innings. But India needed to bowl some overs in 4th evening. Roughly 4 overs. Dada declared 211/2 with Dravid on 91. Dravid was the hero in the previous test win. Yes nobody cried then. Ganguly was also involved in Sachin decision IIRC
New guy Posted July 21, 2025 Posted July 21, 2025 10 hours ago, Lord said: Why would he invite negative attention and criticism upon himself Because it's still attention. Someone who constantly lived in the shadow of greatness will always crave attention.
New guy Posted July 21, 2025 Posted July 21, 2025 (edited) 8 hours ago, Lord said: Yes nobody cried then. Ganguly was also involved in Sachin decision IIRC According to Sachin Ganguly came and apologized to him and said he wasn't informed (and Wright said the same). Edited July 21, 2025 by New guy
vvvslaxman Posted July 21, 2025 Author Posted July 21, 2025 15 hours ago, Lord said: Yes nobody cried then. Ganguly was also involved in Sachin decision IIRC Let us put this way. Even if he had scored 200 that would not have been remembered as much : It will become a folklore. In 2080 someone will be saying "INdian team management hatched a plan to insult Sachin" Lord 1
Lord Posted July 21, 2025 Posted July 21, 2025 9 hours ago, New guy said: Because it's still attention. Someone who constantly lived in the shadow of greatness will always crave attention. Dravid was going through peak form at that time having won Adelaide Test few months back and scoring runs himself. Strange to say he craved attention at that time. There was plenty of attention on him at that time
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now