ACC Men's Asia Cup Rising stars | 14th Nov - 23rd Nov | Discussion

[Lord]

3 hours ago, maniac said:

Priyansh Arya is a hack. Where is Prabhsimran aka @Lord ? He can time the pants off the ball and has a much better technique and balance than this Priyansh. I have become a fan of rebel star Prabhassimran

 

Usually he's the keeper for these sides. Who's keeping here?

[Lone Wolf]

51 minutes ago, Vickydev said:

Well look at the bright side..guy called Muhammad Ghori never got to score the winning runs 

Ghazi Ghori it was 

[Lone Wolf]

Pakistani finger spinner looked lethal and our batters suck against half decent spin.

[tapandrun]

12 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Pakistani finger spinner looked lethal and our batters suck against half decent spin.

V.sure if Pak was bowling second and they would have got Vaibhav early. Ind would have had tourbel with 139 chase v.pak bowling.

 

[vvvslaxman]

India sent a poor bowling unit. This Yash Thakur is sweating bullets even before his run up lol How unfit this guy is. Why is Yash Dhayal not playing but this guy.

[Gollum]

Why didn't we boycott this match? 

[tapandrun]

1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

India sent a poor bowling unit. This Yash Thakur is sweating bullets even before his run up lol How unfit this guy is. Why is Yash Dhayal not playing but this guy.

 

Google yash dayal you will find out why he didnt play upt20 and why he is nt selected.

 

Thakur has been playing in Ind FC for sometime now and has been playing Ipl for few seasons now.

 

Gurajp and Suyash has no other credentials but being an T20 bowler

 

Harsh has been amongst top wkt taker in FC cricket..

 

This is decent enough bowling on papers for such a tournament.

Edited November 16, 2025 by tapandrun

[Vickydev]

4 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Ghazi Ghori it was 

His fullname is Muhammad Ghazi Ghori

[iroman]

Fellow cricket lovers, some feedback please....

 

Did anyone see the boundary catch they disallowed?  What is with this new rule that the commentators and news articles are "claiming"?  I don't recognize the commentators but suspect that they were anti India.  Since the 3rd umpire made a mistake they tied to justify it.  I think they got it wrong.  No wonder all Indian players argued forever with he umpires.

 

The rule change requires the fielder to not touch the ground outside the boundary, after they have touched it once.  Key word is "jump from outside".  In this case the jump was not from outside. It was this new rule application since they didn't give a six either.  Just crazy..

[tapandrun]

39 minutes ago, iroman said:

Fellow cricket lovers, some feedback please....

 

Did anyone see the boundary catch they disallowed?  What is with this new rule that the commentators and news articles are "claiming"?  I don't recognize the commentators but suspect that they were anti India.  Since the 3rd umpire made a mistake they tied to justify it.  I think they got it wrong.  No wonder all Indian players argued forever with he umpires.

 

The rule change requires the fielder to not touch the ground outside the boundary, after they have touched it once.  Key word is "jump from outside".  In this case the jump was not from outside. It was this new rule application since they didn't give a six either.  Just crazy..

Think Per new rules it was not out, so after 1 contact if he would have been inside the boundary and remained inside the field of play it would have be given the catch but he was out side field of play so it was not rewarded the catch.

 

 

 

 

Edited November 17, 2025 by tapandrun

[iroman]

1 hour ago, tapandrun said:

Think Per new rules it was not out, so after 1 contact if he would have been inside the boundary and remained inside the field of play it would have be given the catch but he was out side field of play so it was not rewarded the catch.

 

 

 

 

I read that in the news articles.  But the new law doesn't say that at all.

 

 

It talks only about touching the ball airborne as fielder is jumping in from outside. Indian fielder never jumped from outside while touching the ball in air.  

[tapandrun]

36 minutes ago, iroman said:

I read that in the news articles.  But the new law doesn't say that at all.

 

 

It talks only about touching the ball airborne as fielder is jumping in from outside. Indian fielder never jumped from outside while touching the ball in air.  

think there are too many words but simply it means, fielder has to go airborne inside the field of play and land inside the field of play for that to be considered a catch. 

 

A catch is only legal if:

1. The first time the fielder touches the ball while airborne outside-- meaning they started their jump from Inside the field of play

2. He must land inside the field of play immediately afterward,

3. And MUST remain inside until the ball is dead.

 

So unless some1 is physically v.flexible the only way this can happen is a fielder jumps vertically with bit of back arched backwards over the boundary or if some1 hops on one/both legs inside the boundary having other/both leg airborne outside boundary and retain their balance back on the feet which was inside the field of play without touching any part of the body out side boundary in whole the process.

 

Or else they have ability to fly 

 

   

 

 

Edited November 17, 2025 by tapandrun

[Tillu]

So much hype for him on this forum but Priyansh Arya is a pure 24 Carat unadulterated hack.

[iroman]

6 minutes ago, tapandrun said:

think there are too many words but simply it means, fielder has to go airborne inside the field of play and land inside the field of play for that to be considered a catch. 

 

A catch is only legal if:

1. The first time the fielder touches the ball while airborne outside-- meaning they started their jump from Inside the field of play

2. He must land inside the field of play immediately afterward,

3. And MUST remain inside until the ball is dead.

 

 

I don't know brother....

As someone who reviews patents for a living, when I read "from  outside", that too in two different sections, I understand that to mean "from outside" and not "from inside".

 

That's the fun of cricket nowadays...they have made the laws challenging even for patent attorneys. Hopefully they clarify the wording soon. 

[tapandrun]

42 minutes ago, iroman said:

I don't know brother....

As someone who reviews patents for a living, when I read "from  outside", that too in two different sections, I understand that to mean "from outside" and not "from inside".

 

That's the fun of cricket nowadays...they have made the laws challenging even for patent attorneys. Hopefully they clarify the wording soon. 

Yes they have made it sound v.difficult to understand. 

 

Found this on yt

 

Edited November 17, 2025 by tapandrun

[Suhaan]

20 minutes ago, Tillu said:

So much hype for him on this forum but Priyansh Arya is a pure 24 Carat unadulterated hack.

No,he's is that type of batsmen who doesn't alter their bat swing or flow while playing the shot i.e on flat conditions or true pace bounce it yields results but on pitches which have variable pace and bounce that causes problem

He needs to adjust shot making while playing on such surfaces,quite young though

[Lord]

30 minutes ago, Tillu said:

So much hype for him on this forum but Priyansh Arya is a pure 24 Carat unadulterated hack.

 

T20 requires hacks only, specially ones who can hit Cummins,Pathirana and Kuldeep.

 

Same idiots were crying about Abhishek too, guess he turned out well

[Lord]

11 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

No,he's is that type of batsmen who doesn't alter their bat swing or flow while playing the shot i.e on flat conditions or true pace bounce it yields results but on pitches which have variable pace and bounce that causes problem

He needs to adjust shot making while playing on such surfaces,quite young though

 

T20s are supposed to be played on pattas. 

[Tillu]

5 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

T20 requires hacks only, specially ones who can hit Cummins,Pathirana and Kuldeep.

 

Same idiots were crying about Abhishek too, guess he turned out well

 

Abhishek is not a hack. He has great offside game. Priyansh looks to muscle the ball from awkward positions through legside which makes him a hack.

 

He is still pretty young. Hope he too gets a training session with Yuvaraj who can correct his batswing and mistakes.

[Lord]

11 minutes ago, Tillu said:

 

Abhishek is not a hack. He has great offside game. Priyansh looks to muscle the ball from awkward positions through legside which makes him a hack.

 

He is still pretty young. Hope he too gets a training session with Yuvaraj who can correct his batswing and mistakes.

 

Abhishek was same 2 years ago.  Arya has decent offside game and is a sweet timer of the ball. Will never do well on non flat tracks though. Even Abhishek will struggle when ball doesn't come on to the bat.