Jump to content

Dhurandhar ( Aditya Dhar )

ravishingravi

By ravishingravi
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mariyam Grand Master

Mariyam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Say what you want about Ranveer, but he is someone who always supports and hypes up other films, actors during their releases. The silence from Bollywood ecosystem is deafening. Are they jealous, upset, or being careful to not upset their Pak handlers? Khans, Kapoors, Alia, Karan Johar, all so silent. 

 

Btw Ranveer is UAE tourism ambassador, he and his wife (in hijab) were promoting their mosque. Yet, his movie has been banned from that country, never mind terror financing countries like Saudi, Qatar, Kuwait. This movie has not touched those countries, yet they won't release a movie where Pak are villains. Tells you all you need to know about what they think of Pak terror factory. 

These Gulf Arab countries routinely call out Pak based Terrorism against India. 

 

Their policy on movies is to not release anything that causes civil unrest in their nation. Having a sizeable Pakistani population they don’t want post movie fights etc. 

Gollum Grand Master

Gollum

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mariyam said:

These Gulf Arab countries routinely call out Pak based Terrorism against India. 

 

Their policy on movies is to not release anything that causes civil unrest in their nation. Having a sizeable Pakistani population they don’t want post movie fights etc. 

There was a Pak movie called Waar, anti-India and not subtle about it, no pretence of any bhaichara (like in YRF) starring that tool Shaan Shahid who is a fanboy of Hafiz Saeed. 

 

That released in Gulf Arab states, including UAE. They even had a red carpet event for that film in Dubai. 

Gollum Grand Master

Gollum

Posted
Posted

Movies like Pathaan, Main Hoon Na, Tiger either had Indian villains or some good people in ISI/Pak who teamed up with our agents and defeated the common enemy. No problem for libbus. But the minute we have a realistic portrayal of ISI, so many people lose their minds. 

Mariyam Grand Master

Mariyam

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said:

These Left liberandu Islamist caba HATE India and Hindus and will go to any length to destabilise their own country in support of the Pak/Islamist Agenda- to the extent that they will conveniently ignore reality and have blatant double standards.

 

God bless Tukaram Omble without which 26/11 would have been a RSS sponsored attack with no live evidence to disprove that initially

Buddy, as brave and honourable as Tukaram Omble was,  there was ample ‘live’ proof that the attack was orchestrated by Pakistanis.

 

1) Their communications were intercepted and in a matter of hours Indian agencies were listening in on which people from which region of Pak were handling the terrorists.
2) Some of the satellite phones were registered with Pak army.

3) The ammunition had Pak ordinance factory markings.

4) The stuff they left behind on the dinghy , toothpastes, tooth brushes, combs etc were all local Pak brands which aren’t sold in India.

5) Some of the terrorists made goodbye calls to their parents/relatives Pak landline numbers from cell phones of the people they killed. Most calls didn’t get through, some did.

 

 

 

 

Mariyam Grand Master

Mariyam

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Movies like Pathaan, Main Hoon Na, Tiger either had Indian villains or some good people in ISI/Pak who teamed up with our agents and defeated the common enemy. No problem for libbus. But the minute we have a realistic portrayal of ISI, so many people lose their minds. 

No point comparing Pathan to Dhurandhar.

 

The former is a massy feel good movie riding only on superstar value. The latter is more real and script driven cinema.

 

Its like saying Josh /Once upon a time in Mumbai are bad gang war movies but Satya/Company are so realistic etc etc.

 

Some cinema is meant to be unrealistic and escapist. You go for the superstar.

Gollum Grand Master

Gollum

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mariyam said:

No point comparing Pathan to Dhurandhar.

 

The former is a massy feel good movie riding only on superstar value. The latter is more real and script driven cinema.

 

Its like saying Josh /Once upon a time in Mumbai are bad gang war movies but Satya/Company are so realistic etc etc.

 

Some cinema is meant to be unrealistic and escapist. You go for the superstar.

One can make massy movies without keeping sympathetic main characters from Pak in them. 

 

I get it for a movie like Bajrangi Bhaijaan. But in spyverse movies, no way, makes a mockery of our intelligence agencies. 

 

And why do they need to pander to Pakistanis, not like their movies will ever release in Pak, and Bollywood loving Pak diaspora in UAE, USA, UK etc. won't be anywhere close in numbers to the Indian audience. 

singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

These Gulf Arab countries routinely call out Pak based Terrorism against India. 

 

Their policy on movies is to not release anything that causes civil unrest in their nation. Having a sizeable Pakistani population they don’t want post movie fights etc. 

Agree,

Gulf nations knows that even a handful of radical Pakistanis can simply burn their whole infra and factories...the incompetent police cant do jack to prevent it.

 

All the reason why Saudi and other ME nations constantly bend over to Pakistan.

 

Indians dont do that, they're civil, and that goes against them.

singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

It's also about farming audience. That how SM game works. Farm for negative views and build your audience. 

 

To some extent, yes, but its not sustainable.

No one cares about Dhruv Tatti and Rabies Kumar anymore...only their "fans" watch.

 

Likes of Anupama Chopra, theyve substantial fan base and alleged funding from companies run by shell companies of Pook military. Same goes for many other "superstars".

 

 

kepler37b Grand Master

kepler37b

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

No point comparing Pathan to Dhurandhar.

 

The former is a massy feel good movie riding only on superstar value. The latter is more real and script driven cinema.

 

Its like saying Josh /Once upon a time in Mumbai are bad gang war movies but Satya/Company are so realistic etc etc.

 

Some cinema is meant to be unrealistic and escapist. You go for the superstar.

No wonder you are the honorary president of ICF Balayya FC.

 

Good appreciation of cinema you have :bow:

kepler37b Grand Master

kepler37b

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Gollum said:

No cringe scene like this one. RAW, ISI teaming up to save bechara Indians, only happens in YRF universe.  

 

 

 

Even the most cringe baalayya film will not have a scene as magnificent this....:wall::wall::wall:

kepler37b Grand Master

kepler37b

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ravishingravi said:

Saw this documentary more than decade back. Vice was something then. 

 

 

In 2014 pak army conducted an operation and cleaned up Karachi. Just give it few more years, the violence will be back in new form.

ravishingravi Grand Master

ravishingravi

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Other great thing about the movie. And this is really great thing. Movie is pretty tense. Without spoilers, there are sequences where you have no idea where it's heading. The outcome of those fights and conflicts are uncertain. And I think that was brilliant choice because as audience I am wondering what can happen if X comes in top or Y comes on top. 

 

I am glad I didn't know much about the film. Social Media and internet ruins the experience. 

MechEng Veteran

MechEng

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Gollum said:

No cringe scene like this one. RAW, ISI teaming up to save bechara Indians, only happens in YRF universe.  

 

 

 

It's all KJO obsession with Pak

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...