putrevus Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) Kanishk can hit for a bowler but his bowling is too weak. Edited February 6 by putrevus
putrevus Posted February 6 Posted February 6 8 minutes ago, nitinbwj said: It reminded me of the onslaught of Ponting. When the first innings finished,everyone knew who was lifting the WC That was such a depressing finals. Kumble not playing, always pick extra bowler on batting wicket. That is why I dont rate Fab four they were as phattu as they come. raki05 1
Suhaan Posted February 6 Posted February 6 11 minutes ago, raki05 said: Mahatre technique is still not that promising, kundu is good but his frame is not that big. Don't know but I rate this guy very high, Highly skilled and careless at the same time like young Rohit Suryavanshi with discipline(if) can reach heights he wants to raki05 1
vvvslaxman Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 2 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Don't know but I rate this guy very high, Highly skilled and careless at the same time like young Rohit Suryavanshi with discipline(if) can reach heights he wants to He has technical issues with that stance. More in control against pull.
deathmonger Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Ambrish, Kanishk and Sooryavanshi are one for the future. Mhatre if he improves but India has a glut of batsmen. raki05 1
vvvslaxman Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 Make no mistake . This England is a very good team. Manucrick and tapandrun 2
vvvslaxman Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 Just now, deathmonger said: Ambrish, Kanishk and Sooryavanshi are one for the future. Mhatre if he improves but India has a glut of batsmen. Mhatre bowls..that is the only plus. He turns square at times
Tillu Posted February 6 Posted February 6 5 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Don't know but I rate this guy very high, Highly skilled and careless at the same time like young Rohit Suryavanshi with discipline(if) can reach heights he wants to He strong base helps in hitting sixes but has a weak offside game. He needs to improve on that. raki05 1
deathmonger Posted February 6 Posted February 6 4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Make no mistake . This England is a very good team. Better than India tbh. India just has a generational player. Strangering, raki05 and vvvslaxman 1 2
vvvslaxman Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 5 minutes ago, deathmonger said: Better than India tbh. India just has a generational player. Even in England when we beat them 3-2 vaibhav was the difference. tapandrun 1
New guy Posted February 6 Posted February 6 31 minutes ago, raki05 said: Mahatre technique is still not that promising, kundu is good but his frame is not that big. Hope these guys get the best nutrition and advise to grow bigger in the remaining growth years they have left. raki05 and tapandrun 1 1
rkt.india Posted February 6 Posted February 6 25 minutes ago, putrevus said: Kanishk can hit for a bowler but his bowling is too weak. He is an alrounder
vvvslaxman Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 One remarkable change that is happening in recent times they look for multi disciplined players. Bowlers who can bat batsmen who can bowl. Depth. It makes you better tournament team. tapandrun 1
Suhaan Posted February 6 Posted February 6 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: He has technical issues with that stance. More in control against pull. That's not abnormal for his age,everyone has issues ,point is he will have to work on it and has age on his side to do it,just 17 raki05 1
putrevus Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) 13 minutes ago, rkt.india said: He is an alrounder nah, his bowling is too weak.Mhatre has better chance of being allrounder in whiteball cricket. Edited February 6 by putrevus
tapandrun Posted February 6 Posted February 6 eng was overall a v.good side, couple of v.good batters, fast bowling also looked good. ind batting overall is v.good, only ppl who do not have power game are vaidant and vihaan but they are good at what the are in the side for to keep rotating strike in middle overs. bowling is just poor. raki05 1
nitinbwj Posted February 6 Posted February 6 57 minutes ago, putrevus said: That was such a depressing finals. Kumble not playing, always pick extra bowler on batting wicket. That is why I dont rate Fab four they were as phattu as they come. Yes. Ponting was 50 off 74 at one stage. Smacked 90 off 47 after that. Such demolition was unheard of in 2003. raki05 1
tapandrun Posted February 6 Posted February 6 1 hour ago, Suhaan said: Don't know but I rate this guy very high, Highly skilled and careless at the same time like young Rohit Suryavanshi with discipline(if) can reach heights he wants to Mahatre's technique will improve but he has not cracked Odis yet, he has good record in Y-tests and t20 (Smat and IPL). Think he tries to emulate vaibhav , which is not possible. At U-19 level viabhav can mishit for 6s. Mahatre plays too much in the air but lacks the power game to clear boundary every time.
tapandrun Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: One remarkable change that is happening in recent times they look for multi disciplined players. Bowlers who can bat batsmen who can bowl. Depth. It makes you better tournament team. Yes thats the only time can see they have any/some plan. In previous years they would pick some1 like rahul chahar/bishnoi who are good for t20 level but never improves or get to top pick at intnl level. Ambrish looks good can bowl seam and bat LH, Mhatre looks better bowler than kanishk, Vaibhav bowls useful LA orthodox. Edited February 6 by tapandrun raki05 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now