Need4Speed Posted June 4 Posted June 4 We dont have poweful hitter in lower order..whatever limitations he has..Dube has done it..even in cruicial matches..we need him more now when HaPa is misfiring.. we may not like it but Tilak may be left out.. ideally Samson/Kishan could hv been made captain and Tilak shud hv been in for Iyer.. SKY doesnt deserve a place at all..
vvvslaxman Posted June 4 Posted June 4 Just now, Need4Speed said: We dont have poweful hitter in lower order..whatever limitations he has..Dube has done it..even in cruicial matches..we need him more now when HaPa is misfiring.. we may not like it but Tilak may be left out.. ideally Samson/Kishan could hv been made captain and Tilak shud hv been in for Iyer.. SKY doesnt deserve a place at all.. I would leave samson to his own devices. I don't want his batting getting impacted by captaincy. He is doig keeping as well.
vvvslaxman Posted June 4 Posted June 4 39 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Can't one of the current top-order hitters become a finisher? I mean, there is a logjam of guys who tee off from ball one in PP - why can't one of them become a finisher? Certainly not a lack of skill. Is it mindset? Non-PP-field? Softer ball? Samson, VS, Kishan, Iyer, Varma, Pandya, Abhishek, Dube, 3 bowlers. Hitting from ball one outside power play is not going to be straight forward for specialist top order batsmen. rollingstoned 1
bowl_out Posted June 4 Posted June 4 53 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Shreyas will be a straight swap for SKY right. ONly if Vaibhav comes in somebody has to sit out. Tilak is a good trusted big match player. Would hate for him to go. Yeah, I assumed Vaibhav would come in right away
The Realist Posted June 4 Posted June 4 Sick note Pandya needs to be transitioned out too. Old and diminishing returns. Cricbuzz: It is being said that Sky has been nursing a wrist injury, one that is believed to have curtailed the 360-degree strokeplay that has been the strong feature of his illustrious T20 career. @asterix @vvvslaxman @maniac
BacktoCricaddict Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 52 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Hitting from ball one outside power play is not going to be straight forward for specialist top order batsmen. I still contend that it is an acquired attribute, and can be learned by someone who already has the hitting skill - like Abhishek. I can also see how a batter with strong hitting skills would not prefer to be a finisher because you don't get a chance to showcase your ability in every match. But someone like Dube or Abhishek, who have secondary skills can work there. Oh well ... just interesting to think about.
Sandz Posted June 4 Posted June 4 5 hours ago, Forever Indian said: What is the batting order then and where will Iyer bat? Is this how it will pan out with Tilak at no.6 or no place for Tilak? Abhishek Sooryavanshi Samson Kishan Iyer Tilak Too many top order players in the squad, LOL. He should be made the permanent 12th man captain, and this will allow India to finally claim some innovation in cricket. Two birds one stone thing. Forever Indian 1
Texan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 This is good to hear. There was no point in continuing with SKY anyway. SKY, thank you for your contributions. You have a fantastic win-loss record and some sensations trophies on the way It is time to move on. I would have preferred to have Patidar in the team and given captaincy right away, but Iyer is also a good choice. Players will respect Iyer more since he has played all 3 formats for India for a while now. rollingstoned 1
Suhaan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 7 hours ago, Need4Speed said: We dont have poweful hitter in lower order..whatever limitations he has..Dube has done it..even in cruicial matches..we need him more now when HaPa is misfiring.. we may not like it but Tilak may be left out.. ideally Samson/Kishan could hv been made captain and Tilak shud hv been in for Iyer.. SKY doesnt deserve a place at all.. Tilak won't be left out,he is infact seen as VC and infact shouldn't even think of dropping him who has a proven record Abhishek seems the only one who will dropped to make another vacancy This should have never happened It will be always between Abhishek,Kishan and Samson ,sadly they will have to vacate places for adjustments
Need4Speed Posted June 5 Posted June 5 6 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Tilak won't be left out,he is infact seen as VC and infact shouldn't even think of dropping him who has a proven record Abhishek seems the only one who will dropped to make another vacancy This should have never happened It will be always between Abhishek,Kishan and Samson ,sadly they will have to vacate places for adjustments Abhishek has proven records too..he has taken world by the storm..the MO role what Tilak did..we may expect Samson to fill..who has reinvented himself.. ofc Mumbai lobby may have other ideas.. reppacing AS with VS is just a minor upgrade in SR..imo.. but playing AS and VS together followed by Kishan is a ballistic top order..
Need4Speed Posted June 5 Posted June 5 8 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: I would leave samson to his own devices. I don't want his batting getting impacted by captaincy. He is doig keeping as well. Its possible that Samson may captain CSK too next year.. if he cant captain then let Kishan do it.. In any case Samson in his current avatar looks mature than anyone else to play in MO.. Else just for captaincy I dont like Iyer in the team..the captain should add value..will be unfair to drop either of Tilak or Abhishek just for playing a captain
Suhaan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 4 minutes ago, Need4Speed said: Abhishek has proven records too..he has taken world by the storm..the MO role what Tilak did..we may expect Samson to fill..who has reinvented himself.. ofc Mumbai lobby may have other ideas.. reppacing AS with VS is just a minor upgrade in SR..imo.. but playing AS and VS together followed by Kishan is a ballistic top order.. That is what you and I think,but I feel they are making a case for paindu Gill to come in before WC in place of Iyer(for he too is a low sr player which won't change)
Need4Speed Posted June 5 Posted June 5 53 minutes ago, Suhaan said: That is what you and I think,but I feel they are making a case for paindu Gill to come in before WC in place of Iyer(for he too is a low sr player which won't change) Reroute Cockroach Janta Party to BCCI HQ
vvvslaxman Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 hour ago, Need4Speed said: Its possible that Samson may captain CSK too next year.. if he cant captain then let Kishan do it.. In any case Samson in his current avatar looks mature than anyone else to play in MO.. Else just for captaincy I dont like Iyer in the team..the captain should add value..will be unfair to drop either of Tilak or Abhishek just for playing a captain Nobody should be dropped. But Iyer is replacing only SKY. It is vaibhav that will replace Tilak
vvvslaxman Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 hour ago, Suhaan said: That is what you and I think,but I feel they are making a case for paindu Gill to come in before WC in place of Iyer(for he too is a low sr player which won't change) Iyer can bat at 5 if needed. GIll can't. That is the problem with Gill.
cowboysfan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Iyer is the best option right now for Captain of T20 team,who else we got? we cant make a bowler the captain,we cant make Ishan or Samson the captain because they are streaky guys who go long stretch of games where they score Zilch. and people will b out for blood if that happens.
cowboysfan Posted June 5 Posted June 5 28 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Nobody should be dropped. But Iyer is replacing only SKY. It is vaibhav that will replace Tilak Vaibhav is a destroyer in PP,he either plays as an opener or sits.
Need4Speed Posted June 5 Posted June 5 48 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Nobody should be dropped. But Iyer is replacing only SKY. It is vaibhav that will replace Tilak Yeah thats what I think too…If Tilak or Sharma..work hard on their bowling and develop doosra or carrom ball then..Axar wont be required..and Tilak keeps his place..but its just wishful thinking…hence I wanted Parag to develop his bowling more but injuries and imoact player rule derailed his growth as a bowler
vvvslaxman Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Need4Speed said: Yeah thats what I think too…If Tilak or Sharma..work hard on their bowling and develop doosra or carrom ball then..Axar wont be required..and Tilak keeps his place..but its just wishful thinking…hence I wanted Parag to develop his bowling more but injuries and imoact player rule derailed his growth as a bowler Axar and Dube have very short shelf lives. Nitish will take one of the spot.
Need4Speed Posted June 5 Posted June 5 (edited) 5 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Axar and Dube have very short shelf lives. Nitish will take one of the spot. Additionally, the final xi which we need to fix will be done closer to the icc events..till then they may be looking at a strong squad of 15.. the players will be rotated and rested..by then their current form and any fitness issues will automatically give us the best xi.. till then we will keep seeing some mild experiments to see the balance of the side.. Edited June 5 by Need4Speed
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now