vvvslaxman Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Look at Sehwag's strike rate :cantstop: Link to comment
spectre Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Kohli also scored a 54 in that game. as for playing 7 batsmen,i dont see it happening.none of our bowlers r great n if he gets hammered,Dhoni will be forced to bowl his 10 overs n using part timers is always risky agreed, is it not the case before Jadeja came into the picture (playing 7 proper batsman) We got to go in with 7 batsman, considering how bad the bowling state is Yuvi, Raina and Sehwag can chip in with 10 overs, Yuvi can even bowl a 10over spell, he is doing that most of the time anyways What a part timer can give - max 70 runs, our main bowlers can easily match it, we might as well play a proper batsman and look to chase targets Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 I can't differentiate between Part timers and main bowlers any more. Both have been crap in this series. Link to comment
Lord Posted December 25, 2009 Author Share Posted December 25, 2009 agreed' date=' is it not the case before Jadeja came into the picture (playing 7 proper batsman)[/quote'] believe me they picked Yusuf as an allrounder:giggle: We got to go in with 7 batsman, considering how bad the bowling state is Yuvi, Raina and Sehwag can chip in with 10 overs, Yuvi can even bowl a 10over spell, he is doing that most of the time anyways What a part timer can give - max 70 runs, our main bowlers can easily match it, we might as well play a proper batsman and look to chase targets i would agree to that if we drop a pacer n not spinner,but we r always gonna play 3 pacers.A part timer can easily give above 70 runs,he lacks control n on a bad day there will lots of wides n no balls. Link to comment
spectre Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 believe me they picked Yusuf as an allrounder:giggle: lolz yeah, allrounder my foot Link to comment
Cricketics Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 IT's not a stupid thread, it's just a thread way to early. Tendulkar is not going to bangladesh, so that has already solved our problem. Both Raina, Kohli woulld play Link to comment
Lord Posted December 25, 2009 Author Share Posted December 25, 2009 IT's not a stupid thread' date=' it's just a thread way to early. Tendulkar is not going to bangladesh, so that has already solved our problem. Both Raina, Kohli woulld play[/quote'] thanx i thought i made a mistake by opening the thread:--D n yes its early,i was just wondering wats gonna happen n started the thread Link to comment
nballa Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 both are sitting ducks (literally) against quality pace. i'd throw both out and get in rohit sharma. Link to comment
jusarrived Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 both are sitting ducks (literally) against quality pace. i'd throw both out and get in rohit sharma. really ? Raina > Ganguly & Kohli > Darvid/VVS at this age & i see no difference between Rohits and Kohlis technique Link to comment
Laaloo Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Rohit Sharma Jai Maharasthra :isalute: Link to comment
Master Blaster Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 both are sitting ducks (literally) against quality pace. i'd throw both out and get in rohit sharma. :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Texy Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 can't believe Rohit got selected.....just coz he made 300 in domestics against mediocre bowlers probably on a very very flat pitch Link to comment
rahulrulezz Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 both are sitting ducks (literally) against quality pace. i'd throw both out and get in rohit sharma. can't bet on Kohli but Raina smacked the $h!t out of all ur 'quality pacers' in IPL 1 & 2 Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 drop UV i say :hehe: Link to comment
fineleg Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Does Virat Kohli get dropped when SRT returns? That'll be real harsh on the yengster when he is in good form. R.Jadeja bowls, so tough choice for the captain to choose between RJ,SR,VK Link to comment
Lord Posted January 8, 2010 Author Share Posted January 8, 2010 Zak should go.we should play 7 bats+ Jadeja Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Jadeja should be dropped from his all-rounder spot when Sachin returns. Go in with 4 bowlers with Yuvraj, Raina and Sehwag filling up the last bowlers slot. If Dhoni has no faith in his 4 regular bowlers to bowl 10 overs each, then they should be replaced. Link to comment
Andy Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Jadeja and Bhaji sud fight for One place!! Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Jadeja and Bhaji sud fight for One place!! When the only bowler to bowl 10 overs yesterday was the only one who wasnt chosen for his bowling. 4 regular bowlers bowled 29 overs at an average of 7.25 overs among them while the "allrounder" bowled 9 and the batsmen bowled 12. I completely blame Dhoni for sticking with Zack and Nehra after bad performances. Link to comment
youngindia Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 its rubbish to think that kohli can be considered against raina.raina is way way further in his development and closest among the young to becoming an established player. if the team is foolish enuf to play jadeja and kohli against SA, they are most likely going to lose. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now