Soorma_Bhopali Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Agree:two_thumbs_up: Link to comment
fineleg Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 "It was a frustrating outing for bowlers all round, especially Bhuvneshwar Kumar who thought he had the wicket that could have sealed the win for India. In his third over, the 17th of the innings, Bhuvneshwar delivered a pinpoint yorker that JP Duminy flicked at and missed. It smacked him on the boot. Bhuvneshwar appealed vociferously but the umpire ignored him while the batsmen ran two leg byes. Replays showed Bhuvneshwar's irritation was well placed. When the pitch map was laid down, it revealed that the ball could have gone nowhere else but middle stump and Bhuvneshwar had been denied a big wicket. " Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 again drs and again ppl forget drs and its impact over wc15. besides rohit lbw shout in 2-3 over was also close so it all evens out. Link to comment
beetle Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 "It was a frustrating outing for bowlers all round' date=' especially Bhuvneshwar Kumar who thought he had the wicket that could have sealed the win for India. In his third over, the 17th of the innings, Bhuvneshwar delivered a pinpoint yorker that JP Duminy flicked at and missed. It smacked him on the boot. [b']Bhuvneshwar appealed vociferously but the umpire ignored him while the batsmen ran two leg byes. Replays showed Bhuvneshwar's irritation was well placed. When the pitch map was laid down, it revealed that the ball could have gone nowhere else but middle stump and Bhuvneshwar had been denied a big wicket. " So frustrating. Even bhuvi said 'feck'. Link to comment
beetle Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 http://www.starsports.com/cricket/videos/vod/video=india-south-africa-1st-t20i-did-this-cost-india-the-game/index.html Link to comment
sscomp32 Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 So frustrating. Even bhuvi said 'feck'. Yes. Saw angry Bhuvi first time. Link to comment
Silva Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 again drs and again ppl forget drs and its impact over wc15. besides rohit lbw shout in 2-3 over was also close so it all evens out. , the rohit lbw was probably just clippining the bails and would not have been over turned. The duminy lbw on the other hand was a s out as they come. Link to comment
rajmarie Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 T20's don't have DRS.For our Indian team...T20, ODI & Test don't have DRS. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-south-africa-2015-16/content/story/936047.html Link to comment
Silva Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Man Ashwin is one smart guy. He very simply laid out all the flaws of the DRS. IF bcci were articulate as this more people would understand their concerns with drs system. sscomp32 1 Link to comment
kosingh Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Not having DRS is not going to reduce the subjective element that Indians seem opposed to. moniker 1 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 He would make a great analyst of the game. sscomp32 1 Link to comment
moniker Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Oh yeah? If he is such a great thinker then how did he miss the fact that DRS is only supposed to be used for howlers?If it's umpire's call, that means there was an uncertainty. So it was not a howler. Period. Why should the fielding captain think about umpire's call in "15 seconds"? All he should think is was that decision a clear howler or not so that he could decide to review. Link to comment
panesarv Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 What does he not understand? If the technology is super sure, it's technology's call. If not, then it's umpire's call. After all, our brains and eyes are pretty decent. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Oh yeah? If he is such a great thinker then how did he miss the fact that DRS is only supposed to be used for howlers? If it's umpire's call, that means there was an uncertainty. So it was not a howler. Period. Why should the fielding captain think about umpire's call in "15 seconds"? All he should think is was that decision a clear howler or not so that he could decide to review.He has explained how they can still be biased. Link to comment
Singh bling Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Indian players cannot understand that DRS's main aim is to eliminate blunders by umpires Link to comment
moniker Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 He has explained how they can still be biased. Who dropped the idea in his head that DRS is supposed to remove umpiring bias? It is for eliminating genuine umpiring errors, not for addressing each and every conspiracy theory spun up by the Indian players. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Who dropped the idea in his head that DRS is supposed to remove umpiring bias? It is for eliminating genuine umpiring errors, not for addressing each and every conspiracy theory spun up by the Indian players.then it should be used only for howlers and should be in the hands of 3rd umpire but right now, it is used tactically and not for howlers. Link to comment
fineleg Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Ridiculous umpiring.But even more ridiculous that Captain and players dont push BCCI for DRS!!? High time?? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now