Jump to content

A tribute to Lara


zen

Recommended Posts

Posted
in the same series he scored 60 (70) and 45(45) vs McGrath & co and both were low scoring games :bow:
I asked you a simple question. I didn't ask what Lara did in the other matches. I just wanted to know if Klusener or Donald played in that match :dontknow:
Posted
I asked you a simple question. I didn't ask what Lara did in the other matches. I just wanted to know if Klusener or Donald played in that match :dontknow:
:nice: probably saffers rested him thinking that they will play aussies in the semis :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
^^Did Klusener and Donald not play in this match? Out of 111' date=' there were like 100 runs against Paul Adams and the other spinner.[/quote'] Donald was rested for that match in favour of two spinners, something which,iirc, Cronje regretted later on. Pollock and Matthews were preerred ahead of Donald for that match. But, boy, that was some innings from Lara. I love to watch these highlights when I have to see a majestic innings.
Posted
I asked you a simple question. I didn't ask what Lara did in the other matches. I just wanted to know if Klusener or Donald played in that match :dontknow:
His response probably have something to do with the pic that you have in your avtar:winky:.
Posted
:nice: probably saffers rested him thinking that they will play aussies in the semis :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
oh the eternal chokers :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
West Indies scored 751 and England made 707 for the loss of 15 wickets before time ran out. How did Lara's innings cost his side a win?
Lara is one of my most favorite batsmen, but it was indeed a selfish innings. There was no reason to score 751 in the first place. It doesn't matter what England went on to score. They played 2 and a half days to score those runs. Knowing that it was a flat pitch they should have declared overnight on a score of around 600 to push for a victory. No one can deny that they kept on batting on the 3rd day just to beat the world record and declared it exactly at 400. Yes it probably didn't matter in the end but that's not the point.
Posted
:nice: probably saffers rested him thinking that they will play aussies in the semis :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Donald was rested for that match in favour of two spinners, something which,iirc, Cronje regretted later on. Pollock and Matthews were preerred ahead of Donald for that match. But, boy, that was some innings from Lara. I love to watch these highlights when I have to see a majestic innings.
South Africa :hehe:
Posted

^ He had the support of his players, former players, WICB, fans for going for 400. They would never have got england out, it was a really flat pitch and this was the way they could salvage some pride. By deflating the england bowlers.

Posted
Donald was rested for that match in favour of two spinners' date= something which,iirc, Cronje regretted later on. Pollock and Matthews were preerred ahead of Donald for that match. But, boy, that was some innings from Lara. I love to watch these highlights when I have to see a majestic innings.
If I'm not mistaken, Alan Donald was SA's highest wicket taker in that year. Btw, this particular route of teams from QF to Finals as epic. WI vs SA - WI win WI vs Aus - Aus win Aus vs SL - SL win :--D
Posted
Lara is one of my most favorite batsmen' date=' but it was indeed a selfish innings. There was no reason to score 751 in the first place. It doesn't matter what England went on to score. They played 2 and a half days to score those runs. Knowing that it was a flat pitch they should have declared overnight on a score of around 600 to push for a victory. No one can deny that they kept on batting on the 3rd day just to beat the world record and declared it exactly at 400. Yes it probably didn't matter in the end but that's not the point.[/quote'] After getting bowled out for 47 runs.. in the previous test.. they wanted to keep England under the sun as much as possible.. :cantstop: Anyway St.Johns is a super patta wicket and Windies bowling attack was not really world class. they had 248 overs at their disposal to bowl out England twice.
Posted

Always been a big fan of Lara....Infact even though I wanted WI to lose against us,I still wanted to be entertained by a Lara Special.Unfortunately or surprisingly,never had a special innings against our bowlers,maybe a cameo or a decent innings here and here

Posted
anyone seen him live.. ? i had the opportunity to see so both lara and tendulkar live in the 90s. Disappointed that Sachin failed there. Lara also played an awkward innings. But Hooper and Azharuddin played superbly.. Watching Azharuddin in action was unreal.. one of the freakishly talented player http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65997.html
Actually Hooper for me was a brilliant player on his day...breath taking to watch at times and ordinary the next moment ....too bad he never realised his full potential
Posted
Actually Hooper for me was a brilliant player on his day...breath taking to watch at times and ordinary the next moment ....too bad he never realised his full potential
Mine too.. but he often ended up playing some inexplicable shot and got out.. My only article that got published on cricinfo was about hooper way back in 2001. Archives are gone now.
Posted
West Indies scored 751 and England made 707 for the loss of 15 wickets before time ran out. How did Lara's innings cost his side a win?
This is one way of looking at it. The other way is England made 280 in first inning and were all out. They had to followon and WI had to only take 5 more wickets to win when time ran out. I will remember Lara for many things: 1. For first 10 runs he shuffled all around the stumps and looked really very awkward but man after his initial 15 runs he could single handedly change the course of the game. 2. After Kapil, the only player who hits Natraj pull shot. 3. The best player, even better than Sachin or Dravid while playing backfoot defence, which was the major reason he was so successful against spinners in Test Matches. 4. Had really great temprament, determined, after Hayden broke his record he was determined to regain that record in his name. No I am not saying he is record conscious, that nomenclature is associated with only one player. 5. He had very high batlift, which was the major reason he had difficulty against out and out pace bowlers like Waqar and Akhtar. 6. He seemed to be arrogant while fielding at slips, I mean I never found him a team man like Ponting or Sachin, he always seemed to be maintaining a distance with other team mates 7. His 150 against Aus is probably the best test match inning ever played

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...