Jump to content

Spin could be Australia's Achilles heel in India

CG

By CG
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

CG Collaborator

CG

Posted
Posted
The clash between India and Australia promises to be a classic battle between spin and pace and experience and youth. Australia's great strength is their hit-man squad of fast bowlers, who will be confronted by an experienced Indian batting line-up. How the young quicks cope with the conditions will play a big part in deciding the series, and it could also shape Sachin Tendulkar's immediate future. A good series might see him carry on in Test cricket, but another poor showing like the one he had against England may prompt him to retire. Australia will be comforted by the success Jimmy Anderson had in India, and they will prefer to play three fast bowlers: Peter Siddle and Mitchell Starc will be the first picks, and James Pattinson, if he is deemed ready, is likely to be preferred over Mitchell Johnson as the third. But that means Australia will be going in with two bowlers - Siddle and Pattinson - who haven't played any long-form cricket in over a month. This summer Starc has had consistent success with late movement into right-hand batsmen at a lively pace - a delivery that the highly dangerous Virender Sehwag is most uncomfortable against. His opening partner Gautam Gambhir is, like most batsmen, vulnerable to the away-swinger early on. Gambhir will be a prized early wicket, because he can attack spinners. Australia will be flustered if he gets on top of Nathan Lyon, who is a steady offspinner - no Graeme Swann, but tidy nonetheless. However, none of Australia's other spinners has made a mark so far. Choosing the second spinner will be crucial. They may look to cover two bases by using Glenn Maxwell as a second spinner who can add some valuable middle-order runs. India should look to attack him from the outset to dent one of his great strengths - confidence. If the Indian pitches for the series are raging turners, the other option would be to use medium-fast allrounder Moises Henriques as a third seamer and Xavier Doherty as the second frontline spinner. Other than not having top-class spinners, Australia's most glaring weakness is batting against quality spin. If their batsmen were facing a traditional Indian side, full of wily spinners, it would have spelt trouble for them, but against this team, which is still trying to decide on its best attack, they will feel they have a chance. The Australian batting order contains two areas of contention: who will open and where will Michael Clarke bat? Shane Watson's return to top form in ODIs suggests he'll open with the ultra-aggressive David Warner. That is Australia's best opening combination and it lines up the batting order correctly, with Clarke at No. 4, where he's best suited. Clarke is the best player of spin in the Australian side, so he can't afford to bat any lower than No. 4, otherwise the Indian spinners could have the upper hand by the time he arrives at the crease. With Watson opening, it's likely Australia will have some runs on the board before Clarke has to face the spinners. That makes him a much more dangerous proposition. That leaves the ungainly but highly effective Phil Hughes at No. 3 and opens up a spot for Usman Khawaja at No. 5. This will be a big test for Khawaja, as he is a bit leaden-footed to start with against spinners, but Australia have to unearth some young batsmen, especially in the middle order. Matthew Wade will bat at No. 6, with Maxwell coming at 7. The make-up of India's attack will give a clue to how they propose to dismantle the Australian batting. As Australians traditionally play legspin better than the left-arm orthodox variety, I suspect India will choose two left-arm spinners to partner offspinner R Ashwin. The type of surfaces the four Tests will be played on will have a big part in shaping the result. I expect the pitches to favour spin rather than pace. If that's the case, India will be favourites to win, but only if they have mentally recovered from being beaten by England.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/604266.html
indiaregulator Newbie

indiaregulator

Posted
Posted

Christ, it's not that hard for India. Create Ahmebad style ptiches. Offers nothing for the quicks but something for the turners. Watch Sehwag obliterate Pattinson/Siddle and co. Watch Maxwell do absolutely nothing. Watch Ojha and Ashwin take out Hughes, Quiney, Warner, Cowan, Khawaja and Wade, none of whom can play spin.

cowboysfan Grand Master

cowboysfan

Posted
Posted

are we living in an alternative universe? Ojha and Ashwin are not world beaters,they are steady at best.they cannot win test matches on their own.we need our fast bowlers to contribute or its going to be a bloodbath.

express bowling Grand Master

express bowling

Posted
Posted
Ojha is steady at best' date=' cant call him world class.[/quote'] He has stopped spinning the ball from the last test against England and has continued the trend in the Irani cup. That is an added worry. Based on current form we now have 3 worthless spinners
Vilander Veteran

Vilander

Posted
Posted

did we unearth some genuinely more than village class spin bowler after our last trashing from England ?? i did not know... If we do not get a geneuinly village class spinner we might not be able to trouble the absolutely abysmal technique against spin that most aussie bats other than clark have. Currently we do not have such a spin talent, we only have fatwin and ojha.

Pagalpanti Newbie

Pagalpanti

Posted
Posted

If Harbhajan turns it on, he'll be all over this rookie bunch Aussies have brought but it will all depend on how our batting holds up, which looks pretty grim at the moment. Moreover Harbhajan might not even be in the 1st test unless we decide to play 3 spinners.

indiaregulator Newbie

indiaregulator

Posted
Posted

Guys, can I point out that the Indian spinners were whacked by the likes of KP and Cook and to an extent Prior? Can I also point out that Ian Bell, Trott, Compton etc didn't do all that well against spin. Also note that Clarke aside, Australia don't have a single player who is even as good as Trott/Bell let alone KP and Cook. Especially at the art of playing spin. You'll be fine. Just keep dabbing leg stump balls to Clarke so he gets off strike and just get the one at the other end out.

SLICKR392 Newbie

SLICKR392

Posted
Posted
Guys, can I point out that the Indian spinners were whacked by the likes of KP and Cook and to an extent Prior? Can I also point out that Ian Bell, Trott, Compton etc didn't do all that well against spin. Also note that Clarke aside, Australia don't have a single player who is even as good as Trott/Bell let alone KP and Cook. Especially at the art of playing spin. You'll be fine. Just keep dabbing leg stump balls to Clarke so he gets off strike and just get the one at the other end out.
We don't need your consolation. You're players are still crap against spin its just that our spinners are much worse than your batsman.
Vilander Veteran

Vilander

Posted
Posted
We don't need your consolation. You're players are still crap against spin its just that our spinners are much worse than your batsman.
chin up yes...but i think after our recent ownages we have to agree kp and cook are world class atm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...