maniac Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Beauty of this ball is perfect length he it which hit the top of off stump and did not let cook come forward Good support bowler....More effective because of Johnson rampage......Wouldn't rely on him to lead the attack...Not doubting his ability,just his lasting ability. Guys like Steyn and Johnson are freaks of nature health wise more so Steyn who is fit and firing 9/10 times....Johnson while keeps himself available more is hit or miss,But still that is what a spearhead should be
rkt.india Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Beauty of this ball is perfect length he it which hit the top of off stump and did not let cook come forward The reason is different. The ball came-in in the air, look at the seam but moved away after pitching. Ball hits the area close to the crack and that certainly played its part in ball moving away rather than coming in. Cook was playing for inswing and at that pace, you do not get much time adjust.
Old guy Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 The reason is different. The ball came-in in the air' date=' look at the seam but moved away after pitching. Ball hits the area close to the crack and that certainly played its part in ball moving away rather than coming in. Cook was playing for inswing and at that pace, you do not get much time adjust.[/quote'] It did swing in air but hit the seam and moved away and it did not hit any crack I saw that clearly on TV just hit the seam and changed direction and cook just could not come forward cos of was not really a full ball and tbh its similar to ball which took his edge before this time it just hit the stump
CG Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Stroy of ryan harris is perfect example for our fast bowlers.He Just improved and improved with age and hard work.At 34 I have not seen better bowlers than harris .
rkt.india Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 It did swing in air but hit the seam and moved away and it did not hit any crack I saw that clearly on TV just hit the seam and changed direction and cook just could not come forward cos of was not really a full ball and tbh its similar to ball which took his edge before this time it just hit the stump Look at the clip above. It did not hit the crack, but it was hit very close to that crack and that spot might be a soft part which enabled the ball to go away rather than coming in as it was intended to be an inswinger, coming in the air that foxed Cook.
Old guy Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Look at the clip above. It did not hit the crack' date=' but it was hit very close to that crack and that spot might be a soft part which enabled the ball to go away rather than coming in as it was intended to be an inswinger, coming in the air that foxed Cook.[/quote'] No pitch was hard just had classical cracks and when it did not hit crack it was a patta
rkt.india Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 No pitch was hard just had classical cracks and when it did not hit crack it was a patta Area near to cracks always becomes a bit softer which can lead to a but unevenness.
Old guy Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Area near to cracks always becomes a bit softer which can lead to a but unevenness. Not always and it was not even near crack was 2 or 3 inches away And no other ball near crack got deviated this just hit seam that's it just see the video again I saw whole match and crack only came in play when some bouncers were bowled and ball just sailed over batsman
Raghav_12 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Area near to cracks always becomes a bit softer which can lead to a but unevenness. I don't think that crack had anything to do with the movement of the ball. There were few balls where these cracks came in play but that wasn't the case here.
ravishingravi Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 Harris revealed he will have a knee operation after Australia's tour to South Africa next month in a bid to extend his career to the next Ashes series in England. "I've a chance to play in England. We have maybe 11 Tests before I get there. I have bit of stuff floating in my knee I will get cleaned out and that could give me a year or two. I was hoping to get through this series and then reassess. The coach and captain are keen to have me there. But let's get through this Test, South Africa and go from there, but I would love one more trip to England and defend the Ashes." Man. I really hope he plays for 2 years atleast.
Vijy Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 The world's finest fast-medium bowler along with Phil and Steyn.
adi B Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 my favourite fast bowler,steyn,johnson come close 2nd,3rd
rkt.india Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 The world's finest fast-medium bowler along with Phil and Steyn. He and Steyn are genuine fast bowlers. Phil is fast medium.
King Tendulkar Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 O'Rly? Shane Bond says Hi! :phehehe: Suprised you like players like bond and harris. They bowleed often at 90mph. Would they not be more effective at 78mph like bowlers you want for our team This is problem with indians We rightly drool over fast bowlers from other countries like Harris, Seyn and MJ(who is not that accurate but quick). Yet when come to pciking and developing players for our team. Hate the fast ones and dont want to invest time in developing and grooming our own weapons. Instead praise and defend to the death trundelrs at 78 mph who get a bit of out swing from a nice line at off stump! Odd double standard O well many will just go with what sunny thinks i.e lets face it we will never have fast bowlers so need to focus on nice pretty accurate bowlers
rkt.india Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Suprised you like players like bond and harris. They bowleed often at 90mph. Would they not be more effective at 78mph like bowlers you want for ourteam This is problem with indians We rightly drool over fast bowlers from other countries like Harris, Seyn and MJ(who is not that accurate but quick). Yet when come to pciking and developing players for our team. Hate the fast ones and dont want to invest time in developing and grooming our own weapons. Instead praise and defendto the death trundelrs at 78 mph who get a bit of out swing from a nice line at off stump! Odd double standard O well many will just go with what sunny thinks i.e lets face it we will never have fats bowlers so need to focus on nice pretty accurae bowlers :hysterical::--D:hysterical::giggle::haha::cantstop::winky:
Vijy Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Harris is a wonderful quick bowler, though not a phaast bowler in that sense. He maintains consistent pace, line and length, and control over swing.
GolGappe Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Awesome bowler. Can crank it up to 90mph if required. Never seen a batsman really dominate him. I shudder to think what Johnson and Harris will do to Indian tail-enders later this year.
vvvslaxman Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Harris length, channel.. more importantly the height from which he releases the ball is too perfect.
King Tendulkar Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Harris length' date=' channel.. more importantly the height from which he releases the ball is too perfect.[/quote'] AND PACE I know trundler fans dont like it but pace is massive ingredent. If he was doing all that at 79 mph he would be avreage. But does at times at 90mph, can crank it when we wants. Why are we so scared to say pace is crucial ingredient here? He is told do all those good things but at Pace. Injuries etc etc. Dont care does he, runs in and bowls fast. Plus backed by australia to do this. Backed by captain and management
vvvslaxman Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 AND PACE I know trundler fans dont like it but pace is massive ingredent. If he was doing all that at 79 mph he would be avreage. But does at times at 90mph, can crank it when we wants. Why are we so scared to say pace is crucial ingredient here? He is told do all those good things but at Pace. Injuries etc etc. Dont care does he, runs in and bowls fast. Plus backed by australia to do this. Backed by captain and management 250 horse power car when you go at 60 mph it will be smoot 120 horse power car when you go at 60 mph it won't be smooth So capacity determines. Our bowlers are 120 horse power cars Harris, bigger, stronger than any INdian bowler i have ever seen in history. May be Bharat Arun looked bulkier lol. But he was an A grade trundler. Physical attributes plays a role too. This guy doesn't even look like putting effort while bowling those speeds. Our bowlers look like they are going to die when they crank up speed. There is no efforllessness. That includes SHami. Umesh is the only one who looks quick without much effort. Others look like they have to operate at 120% to . Physically and athletically we have a long long way to go . If they crank up for a while they go wayward.. then they lose control.. to correct they automatically slow down. Unless they have some special skill like Wasim Akram who was allowed to be wayward, they will have to be on the money most of the time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now