Lord Posted June 20, 2014 Posted June 20, 2014 Looking at tall pacers doing well' date=' they might play both Pankaj and Ishant with Shami.[/quote'] Pandey has better chance of playing than Pankaj anyways Bhuvi will start I think
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Pandey has better chance of playing than Pankaj anyways Bhuvi will start I think Pandey isnt as tall and lacks pace. I dont know why you think BK is a sure starter as he didnt play last 4 tests overseas.
Cricket_Hacker Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 I dont know why you think BK is a sure starter as he didnt play last 4 tests overseas. rkt replying to rkt :hmmm: anyways ,zak is gone,so Bhuvi is a sureshot
express bowling Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 rkt replying to rkt :hmmm: anyways ,zak is gone,so Bhuvi is a sureshot I don't think so. Dhoni will most probably pick Shami, Ishant and Pandey. I am just stating what I think would be Dhoni's choice.
express bowling Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Pankaj Singh has wicket taking ability, good pace, height, bounce, swing and seaming ability. Can be a good pick for the first test.
renjith Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 except for shami, rest of the selections most probably could be based on the 2 practice matches.
div Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Shami lacks stamina, will be useless after 2nd test match.. India have to win 1st or 2nd test match.
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Shami lacks stamina' date=' will be useless after 2nd test match.. India have to win 1st or 2nd test match.[/quote'] That is for all Indian pacers, but stamina will come as he plays more.
putrevus Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 That is for all Indian pacers' date=' but stamina will come as he plays more.[/quote'] We keep blaming our bowlers for all the ills on why Indian team does not win abroad but fail to put enough pressure on so called batting legends who never backed their Indian bowlers. in 2007 tour Indian bowlers did take 40 wickets and would have taken 60 wickets if umpiring was fair 2011 batting never showed up and that is not first time it has happened. It does not matter what kind of bowling attack you have if your batting keeps shamefully collapsing like they did in 2011 you will not win any matches.
express bowling Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Shami lacks stamina' date=' will be useless after 2nd test match.. India have to win 1st or 2nd test match.[/quote'] I got the feeling that Shami has more stamina than the other Indian pacers. So, he was overused and played every game in every format continuously. As a result, looked a bit out of steam in the later parts of the series he played.
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 We keep blaming our bowlers for all the ills on why Indian team does not win abroad but fail to put enough pressure on so called batting legends who never backed their Indian bowlers. in 2007 tour Indian bowlers did take 40 wickets and would have taken 60 wickets if umpiring was fair 2011 batting never showed up and that is not first time it has happened. It does not matter what kind of bowling attack you have if your batting keeps shamefully collapsing like they did in 2011 you will not win any matches. we need to admit, no matter how good a batting is if bowlers are bowling well and there is help for them, most batsmen will struggle at most times. It is that difference of quality in,bowling of two sides that make people look that one team's batting was poor, but if same England bowling in that form had bowled to English batsmen, they would have struggled too. I never saw all England pace bowlers bowl like that before or after. The Broad who is now struggling to hit 85 was hitting 90 mph then, same for Tim Bresnan and exgerated movement, they proved difficult. We talk about PK swinging at 75-80 mph, they were swinging big at 85-90 mph.
express bowling Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 We keep blaming our bowlers for all the ills on why Indian team does not win abroad but fail to put enough pressure on so called batting legends who never backed their Indian bowlers. in 2007 tour Indian bowlers did take 40 wickets and would have taken 60 wickets if umpiring was fair 2011 batting never showed up and that is not first time it has happened. It does not matter what kind of bowling attack you have if your batting keeps shamefully collapsing like they did in 2011 you will not win any matches. In the 2011/12 season England and Australia tour , with our batting superstars at the twilight of their career, we batted horribly and lost. But, in the SAF and NZ tour of 2013/14, our young guns Kohli, Rahane and Pujara batted well. Even Vijay and, in the NZ series, Dhawan, was decent. Batting was not the culprit then. Choosing an unfit Zak, generally poor bowler selection and some non motivating and unimaginative captaincy, played a large part in the defeats.
putrevus Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 In the 2011/12 season England and Australia tour , with our batting superstars at the twilight of their career, we batted horribly and lost. But, in the SAF and NZ tour of 2013/14, our young guns Kohli, Rahane and Pujara batted well. Even Vijay and, in the NZ series, Dhawan, was decent. Batting was not the culprit then. Choosing an unfit Zak, generally poor bowler selection and some non motivating and unimaginative captaincy, played a large part in the defeats. I totally agree the last 4 tests batting has been fine and it was bowlers who let the team down.
putrevus Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 we need to admit' date=' no matter how good a batting is if bowlers are bowling well and there is help for them, most batsmen will struggle at most times. It is that difference of quality in,bowling of two sides that make people look that one team's batting was poor, but if same England bowling in that form had bowled to English batsmen, they would have struggled too. I never saw all England pace bowlers bowl like that before or after. The Broad who is now struggling to hit 85 was hitting 90 mph then, same for Tim Bresnan and exgerated movement, they proved difficult. We talk about PK swinging at 75-80 mph, they were swinging big at 85-90 mph.[/quote'] no that's not true, we made that bowling attack better than it actually was in reality by gutless batting.
div Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 no that's not true' date=' we made that bowling attack better than it actually was in reality by gutless batting.[/quote'] England (2011)-worst bowling performance ever. http://www.dnaindia.com/sport/report-never-seen-england-pitches-seam-and-swing-so-much-duncan-fletcher-1574878
vvvslaxman Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 They have to go in with a solid game plan. You cannot try to buy wickets with defensive field set. England is the last team you try this tactic. They are patient. More proactive approach is needed. Pakistan smashed them with attacking spin, So did Australia. SA also smashed them to pulp. India's traditional way of winning in England is by batting England out. Last time there was no such chance as we failed to cross 300 8 innings in a row. So bowling has to compensate that area which is a huge ask. But they have to be up for it.
vishalvirsingh Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Dhoni does not rate bk highly...He may Play varun shammi I shan't and ashwin or jaddu
vishalvirsingh Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Pankaj Singh has wicket taking ability' date=' good pace, height, bounce, swing and seaming ability. Can be a good pick for the first test.[/quote'] Pankaj I guess is skilled but of bk "s pace... Skills standpoint bk is a shade better than Pankaj. .. I guess Dhoni will go with varun shammi I shan't and a spinner.
vishalvirsingh Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Shammi does not reduce his pace even in his 6th over so for me he has stamina.... I shan't reduces his pace... Varun bowled around 145 in iPl I hv high hope
vishalvirsingh Posted June 21, 2014 Posted June 21, 2014 Looking at tall pacers doing well' date=' they might play both Pankaj and Ishant with Shami.[/quote'] My bet is I shan't will play n pankaj won't get even a single test. Varun may get the nod ahead of bk. If india play 4 pacers india have a good chance but Dhoni won't play
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now