Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, tapandrun said:

But why Ind TM and selectors are ignoring genuine pace bowler and favouring short RA/LA nothing bowlers?

 

- Ind captains like slow sluggish brand of cricket where they have and give the illusion that they are controlling the game

- Ind TM and lacks the capabilities to develop good pace bowling attack

- General ignorance towards bowling

-Do not understand basics of fast bowling

 

Amongst top 10 teams this Ind fast bowling unit could be the slowest and least potent fast bowling attack in world cricket right now

 

coz selectors\TM children play backyard cricket with our bowlers..hence they need only slow trundlers in team..so their children can play easily..

Link to comment
21 hours ago, tapandrun said:

But why Ind TM and selectors are ignoring genuine pace bowler and favouring short RA/LA nothing bowlers?

 

- Ind captains like slow sluggish brand of cricket where they have and give the illusion that they are controlling the game

- Ind TM and lacks the capabilities to develop good pace bowling attack

- General ignorance towards bowling

-Do not understand basics of fast bowling

 

Amongst top 10 teams this Ind fast bowling unit could be the slowest and least potent fast bowling attack in world cricket right now

 

it is probably the worst. even scotland has faster bowlers in their squad. one of them hit 150 not so long ago

Link to comment

India has to pick separate bowlers for separate formats. India unlike other countries (except England and Australia) play longer test series and more Tests. Burn outs are likely. England had Anderson/Broad/Robinson/Leach to take care of Tests. Wood is used as a strike bowler rather than someone who shares the load. For T20/ODIs they have Jordan, Curran, Rashid, Topley, Willey,Wood, Woakes. This separation is not there for India. Jaddu plays all 3 formats. Shami plays all 3 formats. Siraj plays all 3 formats. Kuldeep plays all 3 formats. Thakur plays all 3 formats. Playing all 3 formats drag your performance down.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

India has to pick separate bowlers for separate formats. India unlike other countries (except England and Australia) play longer test series and more Tests. Burn outs are likely. England had Anderson/Broad/Robinson/Leach to take care of Tests. Wood is used as a strike bowler rather than someone who shares the load. For T20/ODIs they have Jordan, Curran, Rashid, Topley, Willey,Wood, Woakes. This separation is not there for India. Jaddu plays all 3 formats. Shami plays all 3 formats. Siraj plays all 3 formats. Kuldeep plays all 3 formats. Thakur plays all 3 formats. Playing all 3 formats drag your performance down.

Have been saying it, we need to imply 2 format limit on players.

That will also widen the pool and in case of multiple injuries we will always have options.

 

For example spinners

Kuldeep should play only Tests and ODI

Bishnoi for ODI and T20

Jadeja only Tests, Axar only ODI's, Washy T20 and ODI, Ashwin only Tests, Chahal only T20's.

 

In pace allrounders, we can play Pandya in only T20's..Bawa for Tests & ODI, Hangargekar in T20 and ODI, Harshit in Tests and ODI.

 

 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, singhvivek141 said:

Have been saying it, we need to imply 2 format limit on players.

That will also widen the pool and in case of multiple injuries we will always have options.

 

For example spinners

Kuldeep should play only Tests and ODI

Bishnoi for ODI and T20

Jadeja only Tests, Axar only ODI's, Washy T20 and ODI, Ashwin only Tests, Chahal only T20's.

 

In pace allrounders, we can play Pandya in only T20's..Bawa for Tests & ODI, Hangargekar in T20 and ODI, Harshit in Tests and ODI.

 

 

no need for Pandu. next gen are better at one of either batting or bowling than him

Link to comment
36 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Hardik clocked 147 kph today with a quick short ball which induced a top edge.

 

And lots of 143 k balls.

he's still a brainless dud, but seeing that pace is good. needs to up his peak pace to 150, and his brain power by at least 10-100 times

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Mukesh Kumar in T20Is

 

5 matches

3 wickets

Average 37.7

Eco  9.4

 

Umran Malik in T20Is

 

8 matches 

11 wickets

Average 22.1

Eco  10.5

 

 

Mukesh gets to play all 5 games but Umran does not get a single game. 

but can Umran coom as much as Mukesh coomer?

Link to comment
7 hours ago, express bowling said:

Mukesh Kumar in T20Is

 

5 matches

3 wickets

Average 37.7

Eco  9.4

 

Umran Malik in T20Is

 

8 matches 

11 wickets

Average 22.1

Eco  10.5

 

 

Mukesh gets to play all 5 games but Umran does not get a single game. 

Only in a historically cuck cricket side that is a norm

We are back to the pre 2000s,getting sissier with each passing day in each facet of the game

Edited by Suhaan
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

As a bowler he isn't bad,but given his batting exploits recently his overall utility has been far less

he is rather bad. he has pace, but only moderate control and even less ability about how to use it. and the less said about his batting nowadays the better

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...