FischerTal Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 padosi admins already cracking down on any criticism of ajju miyan :hehe:
Iconoclast Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 Awww look how Happy Indian's are. Good for you guys. Something to cheer about after that trashing. :giggle: Actually its a sad day here ... Ajmal thrashing was sort of like therapy for them here after continued disillusionment with their own team. No more Ajmal means they will have to find another target to vent against ---> Moeenalitharan :cantstop:
FischerTal Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 pakis and lungans whining like the crybabies they are in unison-> mission accomplished :yay:
vvvslaxman Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 :giggle: Actually its a sad day here ... Ajmal thrashing was sort of like therapy for them here after continued disillusionment with their own team. No more Ajmal means they will have to find another target to vent against ---> Moeenalitharan :cantstop: Only teams that can mock other teams is Australia/SA . Rest of the teams are all in the same boat. Big picture is not which team sucks bad. It is how important to eliminate chuckers without any remorse. Some of the chuckers like Ajmal would get called for chucking straightaway even at club level.
Iconoclast Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 Only teams that can mock other teams is Australia/SA . Rest of the teams are all in the same boat. Big picture is not which team sucks bad. It is how important to eliminate chuckers without any remorse. Some of the chuckers like Ajmal would get called for chucking straightaway even at club level. There is a process in place and it works .. Willamson, Shillingford and Sennayake have all recently been banned. If Ajmal is also found to be chucking after lab scrutiny and not just eyeballing it then I will accept it. However if he comes out clean again will you accept his action is legit ?
vvvslaxman Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 There is a process in place and it works .. Willamson, Shillingford and Sennayake have all recently been banned. If Ajmal is also found to be chucking after lab scrutiny and not just eyeballing it then I will accept it. However if he comes out clean again will you accept his action is legit ? The process is flawed as it can be cheated at in the laboratory if you are good enough like Murali did. I prefer testing in a match situation. Regardless of what they say i maintain he chucks and it is more blatant than Shillingford. You don't bowl in labs. You bowl on cricket pitches.
jusarrived Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 His action was cleared ... unless they got some new chucking rules what is the point of reporting him again ? What Kind of a stupid logic is that ? Once cleared the bowler wont chuck again ?
Iconoclast Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 What Kind of a stupid logic is that ? Once cleared the bowler wont chuck again ? First of all he never chucked in the first place as per the ICC. Secondly if his action hasn't changed from the one that was cleared (as far as I can tell its the same) then you would expect it to get cleared again.
Iconoclast Posted August 11, 2014 Posted August 11, 2014 The process is flawed as it can be cheated at in the laboratory And you know this how ... These are biomechanics experts testing him ... they take in match footage and make the bowler replicate the same delivery and measure the precise elbow extension. I prefer testing in a match situation. Right ... new cricket uniforms just for you :giggle:
thongale Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 Every bowler has to be tested yearly. Especially the effort balls. I am pretty sure 50% are over the 15 degree limit with their efort balls.
adi B Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 Should be banned,no doubt or may get away with the restriction of not bowling the doosra which he blatantly chucks. Icc really having a crack out at these bowlers,aussies are gonna play them in September,coincident much :hmmm:
adi B Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 There is a process in place and it works .. Willamson, Shillingford and Sennayake have all recently been banned. If Ajmal is also found to be chucking after lab scrutiny and not just eyeballing it then I will accept it. However if he comes out clean again will you accept his action is legit ? Even if he comes clear this time (though chances are less and he has to bowl thw same action from the matches) there is nothing in the world that can stop me from calling him the most blatant Chucker in the game right now which is clear to almost everyone in the world except some pakis
mishra Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 Without suspected action bowlers (Ajmal and Junaid) even Afghanistan will be able to compete with Pakistan
mishra Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 And you know this how ... These are biomechanics experts testing him ... they take in match footage and make the bowler replicate the same delivery and measure the precise elbow extension. Right ... new cricket uniforms just for you :giggle: If it isnt to hide the elbow then Why wear long sleaves? New Pashion :cantstop:
Precambrian Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 If it isnt to hide the elbow then Why wear long sleaves? New Pashion :cantstop: To protect from sunburn in Dubai :hysterical:
cric_fan Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 Just hope Chuckbhajan is not recalled to Ind side
Lannister Posted August 13, 2014 Posted August 13, 2014 Chuckers need to be banned. When other bowlers work hard to get wickets, these cheaats just need to throw the ball.
SLICKR392 Posted August 13, 2014 Posted August 13, 2014 Wasn't Senanayaka sent out with a warning and then banned when he chucked during the game?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now