Jump to content

Drop Shami and bring Umesh Yadav


virufan

Recommended Posts

Posted

No pace whatsoever from Md.Shami, giving a lot of width for batsmen to play their shots. With players like Clarke in the ranks, we cannot afford to bowl like this. Bring in Umesh Yadav who is yard quicker. I am not sure how Bhuvi will do in Australia as he is slow too.

Posted

AGree,Having said that Shami is a must in ODI's in the starting line up...better rest him for the format where he will do well in.....We need Shami for the WC

Posted
I'd drop Aaron. At least Shami in the past has showed potential once in a while. Aaron has pace but absolutely garbage.
Shami was rubbish in England while Aaron was most threatening in the two matches he played. Shami is lacking intensity. He neither has enough pace nor consistency or swinging the ball. Wayward bowling at 135k on average wont take him anywhere.
Posted
Shami was rubbish in England while Aaron was most threatening in the two matches he played. Shami is lacking intensity. He neither has enough pace nor consistency or swinging the ball. Wayward bowling at 135k on average wont take him anywhere.
What About ODI's...Want to hear your opinion on it...I have told my opinion on this many times before
Posted
What About ODI's...Want to hear your opinion on it...I have told my opinion on this many times before
In ODIs, he has been doing well because he picks up wickets. He doesnt have to bowl a lot of overs. 3-4 overs spell. There, he can maintain intensity, but lacks the fitness to do that in tests. He was decent in SA and NZ, but hasn't looked the same since England. He needs to work on his action. He will never be consistent if he doesn't improve that.
Posted
In ODIs' date=' he has been doing well because he picks up wickets. He doesnt have to bowl a lot of overs. 3-4 overs spell. There, he can maintain intensity, but lacks the fitness to do that in tests. He was decent in SA and NZ, but hasn't looked the same since England. He needs to work on his action. He will never be consistent if he doesn't improve that.[/quote'] AGree... all things said...I think Shami will be our MVP in WC,We have already seen he doesnt have the intensity for tests,so might as well keep him for Odi's and WC were he will be valuable and will do well for us and not waste him here
Posted

Shami is an average unthreatening kind of bowler. The reason he was successful in his debut was because he bowled with tremendous intensity and was able to get reverse swing. Ever since, he has been a disappointment. I don't think he even deserves a place in the Test squad.

Posted

I don't think we can play 4 pace men. Unless it's an absolute green top, we should play 1 spinner. At the very least it offers variation and if there is a tight match that goes in to day 5, they become quite useful.

Posted
Look at Mitch Marsh. Same pace as Shami' date=' but a lovely action and accuracy as good as McGrath. Will be handful on a seaming track with his outswing.[/quote'] Shami has bowled 134 to 144 k. Average around 138 k. Marsh has bowled 127 to 140 k. Average around 132 k. I won't say same pace. Shami's problem is lack of intensity in test matches... resulting in a boundary ball every over. Not enough discipline for a fast- medium pacer. Not really bowling to a plan. As of now he is good enough only for ODIs.
Posted
Shami has bowled 134 to 144 k. Average around 138 k. Marsh has bowled 127 to 140 k. Average around 132 k. I won't say same pace. Shami's problem is lack of intensity in test matches... resulting in a boundary ball every over. Not enough discipline for a fast- medium pacer. Not really bowling to a plan. As of now he is good enough only for ODIs.
Shami average 84, Marsh 82. Shami quickest 89, marsh 87. Not distinct difference in pace.
Posted
Shami average 84' date=' Marsh 82. Shami quickest 89, marsh 87. Not distinct difference in pace.[/quote'] Around 4 k difference in pace in a test match , with both the average and quickest deliveries, is not marginal. P.s - Shami's average is 85 mph.
Posted
Shami is an average unthreatening kind of bowler. The reason he was successful in his debut was because he bowled with tremendous intensity and was able to get reverse swing. Ever since' date=' he has been a disappointment. I don't think he even deserves a place in the Test squad.[/quote'] Totally Agree that Shammi has disappointed us Fans--- but dont dump him Still. I saw the Mumbai TEst from wankhade - west INDIES was batting and this guy bowling 140+ ON a FLAT TRACK....NO west Indoes batsman including their top batsman knew how to handle SHAMMI... He is GOOD - He is Fast and He has the Talent. Just that He has not been able to deliver continuously and exactly LIKE AGARKAR.. bowls one or 2 easy boundry balls in an over and some times does not bowls to his field. where as the less pacy Bhuvi bowls exactly to his fields and I beeing one of the biggest trundler haters also has to accept Bhuvi's expertise and hats off to him. Shammi will spoil his career if he does not focus well as there are at least 3 to 4 pacers very close to him now... Pankaj DINDA( recent form) Bumrah Shardul Thakur- i feel he is very talented. these 3 to 4 guys are very close to challenging him. But i still repeat the best 5 pacers that we have ar ishant umesh varun shammi and bhuvi only and selectors haev got it very correct. Hats off to them.
Posted
Wait for second innings- then decide between Shami or Aaron
Varun AAron is our Spearhead- the best we have in INDIA. He should play All tests in india and Abroad. he is a wicket Taker even if he is at 60 %. only thing to see before picking him is his fitness. u dont compare a mule and a horse...horse will always run faster and preferred over a Mule. Varun is destined to become one of the best in the world.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...