Jump to content

Rohit Sharma needs to go


Recommended Posts

Posted
how can someone be so good in batting in a version in a location and so bad in so many other locations and in other versions of the game' date=' is this even possible.[/quote'] Its called FTB and rohit's the only one in the team. Even dhoni has scored overseas 50s, this jackass has done nothing
Posted

Rohit Sharma has no where to go. he needs us to feed him and buy him a castle outside mumbai. he is completely dependent on the fans. please dont banish him now. lets keep him. he might hit 10 runs in the next match atleast. pleeeeeeease?

Posted

OK here is the deal...I know people with irrational hate have nothing else to do but I still think he deserves atleast 2-3 more consecutive tests before he gets the axe....It will be unfair if he is played here and there and judged on it. Was given a rope in ODI's and we got rich dividends(still an understatement),T20 well he is an uncrowned king of that format but before we go label him off as a failure in tests,I think he deserves atleast 2 if not 3 tests.

Posted
OK here is the deal...I know people with irrational hate have nothing else to do but I still think he deserves atleast 2-3 more consecutive tests before he gets the axe....It will be unfair if he is played here and there and judged on it. Was given a rope in ODI's and we got rich dividends(still an understatement),T20 well he is an uncrowned king of that format but before we go label him off as a failure in tests,I think he deserves atleast 2 if not 3 tests.
You should give rope to someone who atleast looks like getting runs. Dhawan for example, even though he got out with low scores in both the innings, he was timing the ball nicely in the middle of the bat . With Rohit, he simply looked clueless and someone who does not seem like getting runs. In a flat pitch like Adelaide he was constantly getting beaten around off stump in the 1st innings and in the 2nd one he was like a popcorn on a hot pan against Lyon. If that is the state in Adelaide, imagine what in store for him in Brisbane. Give him full series..play him all matches, he will not score runs. He does not look like scoring runs.
Posted
You should give rope to someone who atleast looks like getting runs. Dhawan for example' date=' even though he got out with low scores in both the games, he was timing the ball nicely in the middle of the bat till the time he was there. With Rohit, he simply looked clueless and does not seems like getting runs. In a flat pitch like Adelaide he was constantly getting beaten around off stump in the 1st innings and in the 2nd one he was like a popcorn on a hot pan against Lyon. If that is the state in Adelaide, imagine what in store for him in Brisbane. Give him full series..play him all matches, he will not score runs. He does not look like scoring runs.[/quote'] The reason ROhit needs to be invested in is plain and simple. Let us take the example of Jimmy Anderson...he was a total beast on Green pitches but couldn't buy a wicket on most conditions...England persisted with him or kept him in the scheme of things and eventually he became almost a complete bowler-Yes still not in Steyn's league but I will rate him as one of the best in the last 10 years. Now going back to Rohit-Here is a thing,Even on the flattest pitches on earth scoring 2 200's within a year is no mean feat....It takes consistent hitting,temperament and skill level to accomplish something like that....People will say Corey Anderson and Afridi have records too or even our very own Yusuf Pathan has 2 brethtaking centureis,but yes they are hacks because a hack will come off once in a while and score a max of a 100 but 200 is something else and flat track is not an excuse. As I said we have invested in Rohit and even though a bit late,he came off in one format...will be foolish to dump him after an inconsistent run over 7 test matches.....Hell Suresh Raina played 17 tests and was given a pretty consistent run...Yuvraj singh played a mammoth 40 tests-again 2 guys who were backed ahead of other consistent performers based on talent and what they did in LOI's.
Posted
The reason ROhit needs to be invested in is plain and simple. Let us take the example of Jimmy Anderson...he was a total beast on Green pitches but couldn't buy a wicket on most conditions...England persisted with him or kept him in the scheme of things and eventually he became almost a complete bowler-Yes still not in Steyn's league but I will rate him as one of the best in the last 10 years. Now going back to Rohit-Here is a thing,Even on the flattest pitches on earth scoring 2 200's within a year is no mean feat....It takes consistent hitting,temperament and skill level to accomplish something like that....People will say Corey Anderson and Afridi have records too or even our very own Yusuf Pathan has 2 brethtaking centureis,but yes they are hacks because a hack will come off once in a while and score a max of a 100 but 200 is something else and flat track is not an excuse. As I said we have invested in Rohit and even though a bit late,he came off in one format...will be foolish to dump him after an inconsistent run over 7 test matches.....Hell Suresh Raina played 17 tests and was given a pretty consistent run...Yuvraj singh played a mammoth 40 tests-again 2 guys who were backed ahead of other consistent performers based on talent and what they did in LOI's.
Obviously you are mixing apples and oranges here. Sharma scoring 2 double tons in LOI's has nothing to do with overseas test cricket. He is a FTB and a fantastic one at that. Probably greatest FTB India produced after Sehwag and that speaks a lot about him. But lets face it he clearly struggles when there is bit of seam and swing. I was expecting him to be successful in Australia atleast because he got a good pull shot but what I saw in 1st test dissapointed me.
Posted

By that logic, kohli should have been shown the door. He also has failed multiple times. Not to forger the massacre which happened in england. Rohit sharma was given only one test. Also, on green pitch, rohit sharma has scored, but that happen only one, against NZ. The wickets in south africa were not fast Rohit sharma was always a test player, but he was not drafted in the team, instead, was made to play T-20, ODI more, due to which, he lost the basics. It is up to him now what he wants. In anyways, even if he does not make a good test player, I will be his fan because watching him bat is entertainment. And it is fine if he cannot be a good test player, may be, he does not have that caliber in him or may be, his priorities are different. But making a threat that he is garbage, useless, etc seems to show frustration and nothing else. I have already said, even players such as kohli, rahane,pujara have failed. And we cannot judge about rahane too, he has serious problem with shot pitch technique. somehow he survives before 25.

Posted

Aid test for Rohit tmrw. If he scores a biggie he deserves a chance in MCG else will be shown the door I guess. And not difficult to pull it off considering a few of the Aus bowlers aren't 100% fit and our good position. Day 2 is also the best day to bat at Gabba.

Posted
By that logic, kohli should have been shown the door. He also has failed multiple times. Not to forger the massacre which happened in england. Rohit sharma was given only one test. Also, on green pitch, rohit sharma has scored, but that happen only one, against NZ. The wickets in south africa were not fast Rohit sharma was always a test player, but he was not drafted in the team, instead, was made to play T-20, ODI more, due to which, he lost the basics. It is up to him now what he wants. In anyways, even if he does not make a good test player, I will be his fan because watching him bat is entertainment. And it is fine if he cannot be a good test player, may be, he does not have that caliber in him or may be, his priorities are different. But making a threat that he is garbage, useless, etc seems to show frustration and nothing else. I have already said, even players such as kohli, rahane,pujara have failed. And we cannot judge about rahane too, he has serious problem with shot pitch technique. somehow he survives before 25.
:two_thumbs_up:
Posted
By that logic, kohli should have been shown the door. He also has failed multiple times. Not to forger the massacre which happened in england. Rohit sharma was given only one test. Also, on green pitch, rohit sharma has scored, but that happen only one, against NZ. The wickets in south africa were not fast Rohit sharma was always a test player, but he was not drafted in the team, instead, was made to play T-20, ODI more, due to which, he lost the basics. It is up to him now what he wants. In anyways, even if he does not make a good test player, I will be his fan because watching him bat is entertainment. And it is fine if he cannot be a good test player, may be, he does not have that caliber in him or may be, his priorities are different. But making a threat that he is garbage, useless, etc seems to show frustration and nothing else. I have already said, even players such as kohli, rahane,pujara have failed. And we cannot judge about rahane too, he has serious problem with shot pitch technique. somehow he survives before 25.
BS. Rohit averages 27 in away matches , but others are way better and average close to 40s except maybe Dhawan. Rohit just does not have the temperament to play test cricket. He is a bottler and his brainfarts will cost the team dear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...