Jump to content

Can India decide who they play in QF?


fineleg

Recommended Posts

Posted
Is India better off being B1 or B2? Come the final league match for Ind, - Ind vs Zim - will India know who the A3, A4 are (Aus, Bangladesh or Bangladesh, Aus)? And even though some ICF-ers will say we should just win it all in league matches - can India decide who they play in QF among A3/A4 ? Will A3/A4 be known by the time of Ind vs Zim ?
Finey, have you lost it? Now that India is winning you want them to lose it intentionally? Heights of Passimism. On the topic though... Group A teams must be preferring to play India instead of SA in QF.
Posted
On the topic though... Group A teams must be preferring to play India instead of SA in QF.
And I do agree with that. I mean all teams are trying to avoid both India and South Africca and play against Pak or Ireland or Windies, but given choice between the two India and South Africa, they would pick South Africa, solely because South Africa seem to be a stronger unit on paper currently and with ABDV's form the way it is.
Posted

Keep a positive attitude. I dont understand this logic. You have to go to play the best to win the thing right? Aim to win everything. Now personally I will give all squad members a game. But to lose on purpose is just plain *****y thinking.

Posted

Not sure if the OP is sarcastic or serious. By the way, Bangladesh aint going to make it. We will either face Eng or SL and they are good sides on their day and you cant choose an easier opponent among them.

Posted

In all seriousness, it isn't that bad of an idea. If you have a choice of facing Australia or Bangladesh in the quarterfinals, you do whatever you can to get Bangladesh. Realistically, this will never happen though. We're topping the group without losing any match.

Posted
And I do agree with that. I mean all teams are trying to avoid both India and South Africca and play against Pak or Ireland or Windies' date=' but given choice between the two India and South Africa, they would pick South Africa, solely because South Africa seem to be a stronger unit on paper currently and with ABDV's form the way it is.[/quote'] We thrashed SA , we are far superior to them.
Posted
In all seriousness, it isn't that bad of an idea. If you have a choice of facing Australia or Bangladesh in the quarterfinals, you do whatever you can to get Bangladesh. Realistically, this will never happen though. We're topping the group without losing any match.
:antijinx: to all who post India will top the group or will win QF or SF easily.
Posted
We thrashed SA ' date=' we are far superior to them.[/quote'] I believe that. You do too but not everyone. The Cricketers having played would opt for India. It's all how opposition sees. Every opposition and every player in the team would have different views. But to break down, this is how I see:- Australia would rather play South Africa than India given their results against them in knockouts is 100%. Sri Lanka would rather play India. England would rather play India. New Zealand would rather play South Africa. I think this is how it will be. Australia, even after beating us handsomely in tri series would still rather play South Africa, regardless of their past history. Sri Lanka and England would rather play India than South Africa.
Posted
I believe that. You do too but not everyone. The Cricketers having played would opt for India. It's all how opposition sees. Every opposition and every player in the team would have different views. But to break down, this is how I see:- Australia would rather play South Africa than India given their results against them in knockouts is 100%. Sri Lanka would rather play India. England would rather play India. New Zealand would rather play South Africa. I think this is how it will be. Australia, even after beating us handsomely in tri series would still rather play South Africa, regardless of their past history. Sri Lanka and England would rather play India than South Africa.
Those are all different teams in past....now everyone knows how imbalanced SA is, take out AB they are not big threat..even Morkel & Steyn are not in good form. May be depending on pitch/conditions teams may prefer certain opponents,but i really dont think any team is too bothered with whom they face,end of day every one trying to win 3 knock out matches,if not in first match you have to face them in 2nd or 3rd.
Posted
T May be depending on pitch/conditions teams may prefer certain opponents,but i really dont think any team is too bothered with whom they face,end of day every one trying to win 3 knock out matches,if not in first match you have to face them in 2nd or 3rd.
Exactly. To win the cup, you actually will have to run into the best side or the favorites or the mot competitive team eventually.
Posted
Didnt Aus or Pak or I forget which team - do it in one of the WC matches? They didnt drop the match' date= but they played slow to get another team to be eliminated? Its not like "taking money to do something", but more strategic. Teams are allowed to be ruthlessly strategic to get what they want like Chanakya, even if ICF can sneer its nose! In this case - a team (or any team) wants to advance as far as possible in the tournament, and the best chances of getting there. Its not about "whats pleasing to do" for people to clap hands.
In World Cup 1999, Australia played slow against West Indies to help WI qualify over New Zealand to the Super 6. They scored last 24 runs in 14.4 overs. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65220.html India themselves have done it (not in a WC though) with Prabhakar and Mongia playing very slow to prefer West Indies in the final of the ti-series over New Zealand. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/66000.html South Africa let India get over Pakistan NRR in a Sharjah ti-series to meet India and thrash them. I think South African 1997 even tried to get India as an opponent over Zimbabwe!
Posted

The harsh truth is that India may or may not decide but knowing Dhoni over the years he will do none of this non-sense and just play to win every game - rest will unfold.

Posted
India themselves have done it (not in a WC though) with Prabhakar and Mongia playing very slow to prefer West Indies in the final of the ti-series over New Zealand. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/66000.html
Wrong information. I watched that game live. a) NZ wasn't a strong side compared to WI in that series b) After Mongia, Ind had bowlers coming in next so Prabhakar (looking for a 100) and Mongia decided to shut the shop. I think that the excuse that they gave was that they wanted to ensure a healthy net run rate or something, but Prabhakar probably played for his 100 (unless it was some kind of match fixing). IIRC, both of them were punished If you haven't watched the game live, it is not a good idea to judge a game based on reading scorecards :winky:
Posted
Wrong information. I watched that game live. a) NZ wasn't a strong side compared to WI in that series b) After Mongia, Ind had bowlers coming in next so Prabhakar (looking for a 100) and Mongia decided to shut the shop. I think that the excuse that they gave was that they wanted to ensure a healthy net run rate or something, but Prabhakar probably played for his 100 (unless it was some kind of match fixing). IIRC, both of them were punished If you haven't watched the game live, it is not a good idea to judge a game based on reading scorecards :winky:
You're right - I based my decision on Raman Subba Row the match referee's "suspicion" to dock India 2 points. I did watch this game much later (not live) but somehow couldn't recollect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...