Jump to content

How Pakistan Illegally Annexed Balocistan.

Malcolm Merlyn

By Malcolm Merlyn
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Asim said:

OK, lets re-partition whole of sub-continent :giggle:

Err no. Partition one time was enough. The Muslims have got their homeland, feel free to receive them, like Israelis do. (who ACTUALLY made a nation for Jews, unlike your sham-'for muslims' nation)
I fail to see why Partition has to be done, since the clauses of partition already stipulated a section of the Indian subcontinents to all muslims who refuse to live in a secular democracy. I believe, that is the expressed core reason for the existence of Pakistan and Bangladesh. So why should there be any further partitions on behest of muslims ? 

Edited by Muloghonto
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted

Baluchistan should be free. Pending issue on Kashmir is Pak's withdrawal from POK which includes territories such as Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Balistan, along with China's withdrawal from Aksai Chin, which is again illegally donated to China by Pak 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Asim Newbie

Asim

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Err no. Partition one time was enough. The Muslims have got their homeland, feel free to receive them, like Israelis do. (who ACTUALLY made a nation for Jews, unlike your sham-'for muslims' nation)
I fail to see why Partition has to be done, since the clauses of partition already stipulated a section of the Indian subcontinents to all muslims who refuse to live in a secular democracy. I believe, that is the expressed core reason for the existence of Pakistan and Bangladesh. So why should there be any further partitions on behest of muslims ? 

bcz in seculolar Hindustan, even today Muslims can't buy homes in major cities. In many parts they can go to jails, or even stoned to death for performing Eid rituals; having cow meat in home... and law will check whether it was cow? well, no issue with that murder, if it actually was cow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Asim said:

bcz in seculolar Hindustan, even today Muslims can't buy homes in major cities. In many parts they can go to jails, or even stoned to death for performing Eid rituals; having cow meat in home... and law will check whether it was cow? well, no issue with that murder, if it actually was cow...

Nobody can buy homes in major cities except NRIs, foreign nationals and big businesses. As for being stoned to death for Eid rituals or issues of murder, i will make no false excuses like your pathetic nation: we have much to improve on, in our law and security concerns. However, we are not quietly conducing genocides like your nation is doing in Baluchistan or already did in Bangladesh and got caught red-handed, then denying to the whole world what is going on. 

When your nation has the balls to investigate the extra-judicial killings in Baluchistan or FATA region, just like our nation actually investigates extra-judicial killings and have found servicemen & policemen guilty ( something i doubt your broken-ass law system has never caught in Pakistani military/police), then you can talk about 'secularism'. Till then, your nation is nothing more than a farce of Punjabi-Pashtun dominance of rest of the land, under the boot of the military which your own government was too dumb to entrust so much power in one hand.

 

 

And like i said, if the muslims in secular Hindustan are so endangered, they are free to go to the land that was created for them- Pakistan and Bangladesh. So why should there be another partition in accord for the muslims ? We already gave land to the muslims- are you saying we should've driven all the muslims out, like you guys did with the hindus and the Sikhs, especially in west Pakistan ?

 

Edited by Muloghonto
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Asim said:

bcz in seculolar Hindustan, even today Muslims can't buy homes in major cities. 

USA is a secular country but it has strict policies on Muslims entering USA. Try buying a home in Jewish community in USA for example

 

So are Muslims worse off in USA than in Pak? 

 

PS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Ahmadis

Edited by zen
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vilander Mentor

Vilander

Posted
Posted
On 9/25/2016 at 5:19 AM, The Outsider said:

Sanghatma at full display in this thread like many others. Question for Sanghis- can you point out some similarities and differences between Balochistan and Bangladesh?

hey after Uri attack, you need to probably be more sensitive. Its pathetic your post there, are you Indian? show some loyalty have a spine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texan Mentor

Texan

Posted
Posted
On 9/25/2016 at 4:19 AM, The Outsider said:

Sanghatma at full display in this thread like many others. Question for Sanghis- can you point out some similarities and differences between Balochistan and Bangladesh?

Can you point out some differences between you and a Pakistani fundamentalist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mishra Mentor

mishra

Posted
Posted

http://thepashtuntimes.com/fencing-the-durand-line-is-no-different-than-creating-the-wall-of-berlin-hussain-haqqani/

Quote

“The Pashtuns of Pakistan and the Pashtuns of Afghanistan have not only ethnic kinship, but also historical bond, and to pursue the policy of erecting a wall along the Durand Line wouldn’t be any different than the “Wall of Berlin”, which was created in Germany, says Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United States, Hussain Haqani.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-31/the-fence-driving-a-wedge-between-pakistan-and-afghanistan

Quote
 

Photographer: AAMIR QURESHI/AFP via Getty Images

The Fence Driving a Wedge Between Pakistan and Afghanistan

On the upper deck of the Hamza Fort border check-point in Pakistan’s South Waziristan, Major General Nauman Zakaria points to a 12-foot high fence just yards away -- the latest initiative the military says will stem insurgent attacks across a more than 1,000 mile disputed border with Afghanistan.

 

“There won’t be an inch of international border that shall not remain under our observation,” said Zakaria, who has served in counter-insurgency operations in restive border regions of south and north Waziristan.

 

At an estimated cost of more than $532 million, Pakistan has started fencing the 2,344-kilometer (1,456 miles) border with war-torn Afghanistan, the latest measure that’s driving a wedge between the fractious neighbors who have accused each other of harboring insurgents launching cross-border attacks.

 
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has condemned Pakistan for instigating an “undeclared war of aggression” against his nation. While only 43 kilometers has so far been fenced since May, Ghani’s administration has repeatedly denounced and threatened armed confrontation over its construction across the disputed Durand Line, which divided the largely ethnic Pashtun communities in the region during British colonial rule.

Just like Chinese, Pakistanis too on land grab exercise on western border on pretext of Durand line which was drawn in 1896 as British area of control

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...