Gollum Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Didn't want to start another thread, this is Gujarat HC ruling. 2002 Godhra train burning case: Gujarat high court commutes death for 11 convicts to life in prison https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2002-godhra-burning-case-gujarat-high-court-commutes-death-for-11-convicts-to-life-in-prison/articleshow/61001808.cms
tweaker Posted October 9, 2017 Author Posted October 9, 2017 In an attempt to test the difference in the air quality, the Supreme Court has reinstated a ban on the sale of firecrackers till 1 November in Delhi,
tweaker Posted October 9, 2017 Author Posted October 9, 2017 Karti Chidambaram, son of former Union Minister P Chidambaram, today told the Supreme Court he wants to visit the United Kingdom to get her daughter admitted at the Cambridge University and was willing to undertake that he would not visit any bank there.
tweaker Posted October 11, 2017 Author Posted October 11, 2017 In A Landmark Judgment, Supreme Court Says Intercourse With Wife Younger Than 18 Years Is Rape
tweaker Posted October 19, 2017 Author Posted October 19, 2017 Whistle for Public Interest (WHIP), a group of law students and young lawyers working for the promotion of transparency and accountability in the affairs of public authorities, has sent a Representation to the Chief Justice of India, Dipak Mishra requesting him to ensure that the mic system installed in all courts be mandatorily used. As per the information obtained by WHIP under RTI Act, 2005, it is revealed that the Supreme Court has spent Rs. 91,95,859 on Replacement of (unused) mic system. The Supreme Court of India, admits the mic system is an inherent part of the courtroom infrastructure, in the same RTI response.
tweaker Posted October 30, 2017 Author Posted October 30, 2017 The Supreme Court on Monday rapped West Bengal government led by CM Mamata Banerjee for filing a plea against Aadhaar. The top court asked as to how can a state question a Central law.
tweaker Posted October 31, 2017 Author Posted October 31, 2017 The Supreme Court on 30 October adjourned the hearing of the plea challenging Article 35A of the Constitution by three months. Article 35A gives the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) Legislature a carte blanche(complete freedom) to decide who are “permanent residents” of the state and confer on them special rights and privileges in public sector jobs, acquisition of property in J&K, scholarships, and other public aid and welfare.
surajmal Posted May 28, 2018 Posted May 28, 2018 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/gujarat-high-court-extends-relief-from-arrest-to-teesta-till-june-13/articleshow/64353573.cms Teesta gets a helping hand from the courts, again. Again, this is a low level footsoldier for the gungandeens. And you people think they will allow incarceration of mother/son duo? diga and Peshust 2
surajmal Posted July 15, 2018 Posted July 15, 2018 (edited) https://twitter.com/Neera_26/status/1018020781886976001 https://twitter.com/ravithinkz/status/1018087315887886337 Edited July 15, 2018 by surajmal
diga Posted July 15, 2018 Posted July 15, 2018 1 hour ago, surajmal said: https://twitter.com/Neera_26/status/1018020781886976001 https://twitter.com/ravithinkz/status/1018087315887886337 Chidambarams (Both Husband & wife) are good lawyers.. They know if not the legal points, the judges can save them Turning_track 1
coffee_rules Posted January 2, 2019 Posted January 2, 2019 Good news for all ye bachelors.. @velu Stradlater, beetle and velu 2 1
velu Posted January 2, 2019 Posted January 2, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, coffee_rules said: Good news for all ye bachelors.. @velu my apt manager wont allow women visitors after 9pm Edited January 2, 2019 by velu
tweaker Posted January 16, 2019 Author Posted January 16, 2019 Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the pleas of five states seeking modification of its order issued last year on the selection and appointment of director generals of police (DGPs).
mishra Posted February 25, 2019 Posted February 25, 2019 Article 35 A hearing, probably to begin on 26th Feb.
mishra Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 Supreme Court cant give any ruling in Ram Janma Bhoomi case.(Politics on wishes Congress) It does not have time to discuss article 35A , which whole of India is impatiently waiting (Politics on wishes of Congress). But MoFos want stolen document contents of which were published in libtard and Rahuls mouthpiece The Hindu to be discussed in case of Rafale (Politics on wishes of Congress till elections only). In my lifetime, I have never seen Supreme Court and its judges to be doing blatant politics. Judges needs to do some introspection. The damage they are doing to institution by blatantly playing politics is also borderline antinational activity.
mishra Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 I also want to know, For a case to be heard by Supreme Court, Is it mandatory requirement that Applicant have to pay either Prashant Bhushan, Kapil Sibbal, Jailey, Indira JaiSingh. Specially Bhushan and Sibbal. Is there direct line of kick back between some Mofo judges and these two advocates? Do honourale Supreme Court judges publish their Asset before they become judge vs after they become judge?
Recommended Posts