Jump to content

Can we trust Pandya+Jadhav with 10 overs?


.  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. 5th bowler

    • Yes, Pandya and Jadhav are good enough
    • No, bring in Shami.


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, bleaf27 said:

If you have limited comprehension and intellecual skills , might as well I may put bullet points for you or just give you a summary because anything more complicated than that gors over your head.

Now your hard on For Pandya is quite obvious but again my posts are not meant for you and your man crush isn't my criteria to post here ,  I am sorry for offending your feelings for being a fan boy.

 

Yuvraj and Jadhav are both better batsman than Pandya and You assessed Pandya's hitting capability on the basis of 7 ODIs vs Yuvi who's played 300 games ?   You might as well print Pandya's face on a shirt and wear it all day.

ABD's run out has no implication or bearing on Pandya , the credit goes to the keeper for his glove work not to the fielder.    His bowling was horrendous against SA / BD/ SL.

My agenda or opinion isn't open to your approval before being posted ,  quite anyways if you cannot comprehend it so you might as well move along.  

^ another pointless post :rofl:

 

Posted
6 hours ago, bleaf27 said:

India vs Bangladesh your Rohit was playing with a SR of 75 in case you missed it and again after reaching a 100 started to accelerate and while chasing a 200 the guy was blind slogging ....but again the daily dose of Indian TV hype is what's expected from you......I hate to burst your bubble but your ability to not see any flaws in your superstars isn't my concern.  I do not drink the blue kool aid 

:facepalm:

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, maniac said:

Pakistani batting first ...mixed feeling

 

wouod have had mixed feeling even if we batted first :nervous:

 

Looks like you're not only having mixed feelings only :giggle:

Posted
2 hours ago, zen said:

^ another pointless post :rofl:

 

Because it's par your understanding .....and using smiley's to show any less of a hurt makes it look even worse.....

Posted
2 hours ago, express bowling said:

No, Pandya has bowled well against SA....and also against Pakistan.

 

He batted well against Pakistan and did not get to bat for 2 games.

 

Anyway, Kohli has confirmed that Pandya will play today and will be preferred in the future too for LOIs.

 

So, all these discussions about his inclusion in the team does not really matter.

We neeed another strike bowler today and the way Pak is batting today and how this pitch looks ....wasn't the smartest decision

Posted
3 minutes ago, bleaf27 said:

We neeed another strike bowler today and the way Pak is batting today and how this pitch looks ....wasn't the smartest decision

We should have picked Shami or Umesh in place of Ashwin.

 

Both are wicket takers.

Posted
4 minutes ago, bleaf27 said:

Because it's par your understanding .....and using smiley's to show any less of a hurt makes it look even worse.....

 

4 minutes ago, bleaf27 said:

 Aww that's it bud , no reply ?

As they say genius has its limits, stupidity is limitless .... you have displayed that you have no limits :rofl:

 

Posted
Just now, zen said:

 

As they say genius has its limits, stupidity is limitless .... you have displayed that you have no limits :rofl:

 

I am quite shocked , not on your lack of understanding to call me stupid but to call yourself a genius ,  who gave you that impression bruv ?  Would have to burst your bubble ...

Posted
11 minutes ago, bleaf27 said:

We neeed another strike bowler today and the way Pak is batting today and how this pitch looks ....wasn't the smartest decision

Huh?

 

Pandya has been the 2nd best bowler today.

 

It's our specialist bowlers letting us down so far

Posted
55 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

Huh?

 

Pandya has been the 2nd best bowler today.

 

It's our specialist bowlers letting us down so far

Don't waste your breath.  In a short time here on ICF, @bleaf27 has shown a very strong tendency to stubbornly cling to his opinion, even in the face of overwhelming facts to the contrary.  

Posted

Pakistani batsman can't play short ball at pace and have history of playing offspin well ,we made monumental mistake not picking yadav who picked wickets against Pak .

Posted
8 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Don't waste your breath.  In a short time here on ICF, @bleaf27 has shown a very strong tendency to stubbornly cling to his opinion, even in the face of overwhelming facts to the contrary.  

Haha subtle jab eh ?     I wouldn't call them facts though .  

I just don't form such strong opinions on players based on such minimal games nor do I have such unconditional love for them all.  Calling out certain players here is frowned upon on ..

Posted
Just now, bleaf27 said:

Haha subtle jab eh ?     I wouldn't call them facts though .  

I just don't form such strong opinions on players based on such minimal games nor do I have such unconditional love for them all.  Calling out certain players here is frowned upon on ..

subtle?  I think that was pretty direct.   You are entitled to your opinions and so are others.    

 

"Calling out" players without any factual basis is frowned upon indeed.

Posted
1 minute ago, sandeep said:

subtle?  I think that was pretty direct.   You are entitled to your opinions and so are others.    

 

"Calling out" players without any factual basis is frowned upon indeed.

Factual basis is open to interpretations mate ,  just number reading of cric info isn't a way I make my opinion , if that does float your boat , fair enough.

7 ODI experience of a certain player isn't enough for me to have man crushes on here ,  I'v set my threshold a bit higher than that.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...