LORD_analyst Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) shardul thakur analysis- good outswinger as got double the amount of swing bhuvi got in his initial 2-3 overs + speed- bowled at 138-140 in his first 4 overs and then 134-135 in later overs. + hits the deck hard and extracts good bounce from it. MY thoughts- felt that he should have bowled more full in first 3 overs as was getting wonderfull outswing and needs to work more on endurance in speeds and fitness ....overall a well deserved position. Future- miles better than bhuvi(avg-47,in 2017 odi's...laughable) and even his swing was about double of bhuvi....see no reason to replace him with overrated bhuvi who can only bowli on wildly swinging conditions that are available once in an year. Edited September 1, 2017 by LORD_analyst
sandeep Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 so, an upgrade from the Dhaval Kulkarnis of the world
sandeep Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: miles better than bhuvi Another Bhuvi hater joins the pack. Vanakkam!
LORD_analyst Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 10 minutes ago, sandeep said: Another Bhuvi hater joins the pack. Vanakkam! Bowling statistics in ODIs FILTERS 2017 X RESET FILTERS FILTERED OVERALL Mats 13 70 Inns 12 69 Wkts 10 70 Ave 47.09 39.55 Eco 4.93 4.89 4Ws 0 2 5Ws 0 0 MoM 0 2 MoS 0 avg of 47 in 12 matches in 2017 ..... dont want to ridicule you but he is really a restricting bowler than who can pick wickets. pandya avg-35 and bhuvi-47.... dont be an ass-kisser. - PS: get ur facts right before accusing me of being a hater. 1
express bowling Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 1 minute ago, LORD_analyst said: shardul thakur analysis- + speed- bowled at 138-140 in his first 4 overs and then 134-135 in later overs. Shardul actually bowled 135 k to 148 k in his first 4 overs and 133 k to 141 k later on. Rightarmfast 1
LORD_analyst Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, express bowling said: Shardul actually bowled 135 k to 148 k in his first 4 overs and 133 k to 141 k later on. 148 was one-off....but regular in 138-142.
express bowling Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 Just now, LORD_analyst said: 148 was one-off....but regular in 138-142. Bowled a 148 k and a 144 k. Those faster balls are important to deceive the batters. : ) Like Pandya got one of his wickets with a 144 k ball while bowling 135 k to 140 k range.
LORD_analyst Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 37 minutes ago, express bowling said: Bowled a 148 k and a 144 k. Those faster balls are important to deceive the batters. : ) Like Pandya got one of his wickets with a 144 k ball while bowling 135 k to 140 k range. i am talking about avg.speeds
Khota Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 He has the speed. Control can be taught, He deserves his chances.
express bowling Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 Shardul batting http://www.bcci.tv/videos/id/501/deodhar-trophy-2014-15-sf-south-zone-vs-west-zone-s-thakur-rips-apart-a-reddy
Vijy Posted October 1, 2017 Posted October 1, 2017 On 9/1/2017 at 1:27 PM, express bowling said: Shardul batting http://www.bcci.tv/videos/id/501/deodhar-trophy-2014-15-sf-south-zone-vs-west-zone-s-thakur-rips-apart-a-reddy it seems to me he has real stamina problems and his relatively short stature makes him somewhat skiddy (not always a good thing).
The Dark Horse Posted October 2, 2017 Posted October 2, 2017 He did decently well. Should be given a few more chances before being rejected. Hope it has nothing to do with the Jersey number. tweaker 1
gakgupta Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 hyderabadi pacer will surpass him pretty soon....
MCcricket Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 S Thakur for me falls in a no man's land, doesn't have outright pace, or is a work horse.He is more of a 133 to 138 bowler on Ave , being on a shorter side, not having enough stamina, and our pace bowling has good stocks will go against him. I see Siraj, Thampi, Aniket, Sangwan, Avesh having more potential then him
renjith Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 33 minutes ago, MCcricket said: S Thakur for me falls in a no man's land, doesn't have outright pace, or is a work horse.He is more of a 133 to 138 bowler on Ave , being on a shorter side, not having enough stamina, and our pace bowling has good stocks will go against him. I see Siraj, Thampi, Aniket, Sangwan, Avesh having more potential then him Only advantage he has compared to others is he got a genuine outswinger.
SUMO Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Was good but not impressive enough. I'm looking for someone who has raw talent ( combo of natural pace height bounce ). Swing can be learnt afterwards. Next hopes on siraj, Aniket, ankit, saini, kejroliya etc. etc. MCcricket 1
Vijy Posted October 6, 2017 Posted October 6, 2017 On 10/4/2017 at 6:09 AM, gakgupta said: hyderabadi pacer will surpass him pretty soon.... Siraj presumably. He has stamina and motivation issues as well.
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 Has T20 economy rate in ODIs and ODI economy rate in Tests.
sandsaims Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 (edited) Should not be anywhere near the Indian Team. Edited January 15, 2021 by sandsaims express bowling 1
Serpico Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 On 10/4/2017 at 3:39 PM, gakgupta said: hyderabadi pacer will surpass him pretty soon.... Good call
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now