BeautifulGame Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 The general thumb of rule is that if the Fertility rate is less that 2.1,then it reduces population growth . Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk velu and tweaker 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 UP , bihar and jharkhand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rageaddict Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) Look at all the backward North East States with fertility rates of 3, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.4. The so called Progressive Indians. Bihar as it is leading from the front Masha Allah, enriching every corner of the country with Hindu and Hindi culture since 1947. Lage Raho!!!!!!! Edited September 23, 2017 by rageaddict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 backward states overpopulating.intelligent states population dwindling.Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarcastic Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 50 minutes ago, rageaddict said: Look at all the backward North East States with fertility rates of 3, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.4. The so called Progressive Indians. Bihar as it is leading from the front Masha Allah, enriching every corner of the country with Hindu and Hindi culture since 1947. Lage Raho!!!!!!! The total population of NE India (other than Assam) is very very less. The rates you see are from those and quite insignificant w.r.t. what they will add to whole of India. UP, Bihar and Jharkhand are of concern though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 It's absolutely suicidal to be below 2.1 in any state... Gollum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) Do they have a religion wise breakup? Edited September 23, 2017 by Gollum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Do they have a religion wise breakup? Muslims will be at the top no doubt.followed by northie hindus.Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Tibarn said: It's absolutely suicidal to be below 2.1 in any state... Yes. because 1.2 billion people in India are not enough. beetle, velu and chewy 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Comrade Radish doesn't understand why 2.1 is considered replacement level, either in biological or in economic terms. One can't expect much better from him, after all, all his "knowledge" comes from plagiarizing wikipedia. Lol Salaam bro, Lol Salaam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 41 minutes ago, Tibarn said: Comrade Radish doesn't understand why 2.1 is considered replacement level, either in biological or in economic terms. One can't expect much better from him, after all, all his "knowledge" comes from plagiarizing wikipedia. Lol Salaam bro, Lol Salaam. We need less than replacement level for an overpopulated nation. too hard to understand for Hari-Om chaddis who are too busy popping out too many kids 'for the Kaum'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We need less than replacement level for an overpopulated nation. too hard to understand for Hari-Om chaddis who are too busy popping out too many kids 'for the Kaum'. its mohammedans who are responsible for high population growth.Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Just now, Tendu_10 said: its mohammedans who are responsible for high population growth. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk most of the states contributing to India's demographic disaster and adding poor people have very low muslim population. Ie, except for Bihar and UP, i don't see a state above 2.1 growth rate with significant muslim population... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 most of the states contributing to India's demographic disaster and adding poor people have very low muslim population. Ie, except for Bihar and UP, i don't see a state above 2.1 growth rate with significant muslim population... UP is biggest problem 200 million n rising because of mohammedansSent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 52 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: most of the states contributing to India's demographic disaster and adding poor people have very low muslim population. Ie, except for Bihar and UP, i don't see a state above 2.1 growth rate with significant muslim population... even in the states like TN and karnataka where birth rate is low , muslim birth rate might be far higher than hindus/christains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 even in the states like TN and karnataka where birth rate is low , muslim birth rate might be far higher than hindus/christains it will be.Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, velu said: even in the states like TN and karnataka where birth rate is low , muslim birth rate might be far higher than hindus/christains I'd be surprised if they are 'far' higher, but yes, i do expect them to be higher. either way, 'lets f*ck our nation over for resources, overpopulation, deforestation, eco-systems collapse so we can be 4 billion in the future and still have 80-20 hindu-muslim ratio' is such a crappy piece of logic. For one, pro-growth rate idiots are missing the forest for the trees- whole soceity suffers when its overpopulated. Rich, poor, everyone. For two, 170-odd muslims are not going to become 30-40% of the nation in hundreds of years by their growth differential, so its fear-mongering at the cost of the whole nation. Book_Worm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 2 hours ago, Tendu_10 said: UP is biggest problem 200 million n rising because of mohammedans Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Yep. Put Bengal and UP together and in 300-400 years, Ganga will have more muslims living on its banks than hindus. And if that happens- where for hundreds of years we let this religion business dominate our lives- our descendants will deserve their fate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tendu_10 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Yep. Put Bengal and UP together and in 300-400 years, Ganga will have more muslims living on its banks than hindus. And if that happens- where for hundreds of years we let this religion business dominate our lives- our descendants will deserve their fate. how do we deal with the muslim problem in these areas. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts