Why didn't India review that LBW shout against ABDV?

[Trichromatic]

Usually they review some decisions which are clearly not out and from out of nowhere came this.

 

Quote

31.4

Ishant to de Villiers, no run, huuuuge shout for LBW, not given. Excellent delivery, de Villiers had no clue. Oh dear, DRS says three reds and India didn't review. AB would have been out. Ravi Shaz isn't happy in the dressing room and Kohli drops his head as he sees the replay on the big screen. Brilliant inswinger on a good length, de Villiers was caught on the crease, not fully forward in his defence, the bat got stuck behind the pad as de Villiers tried to defend, impact on middle and off, height was the only question, enough doubt for the on-field umpire to say not out, but ball-tracker shows the ball would have crashed into the top of leg stump

How come whole team is so clueless?

[kira]

Just like SA didnt review pujara's lbw #indsabhaibhai

[Sachinism]

They didn't want to fall behind on the over-rate. Reviewing decisions wastes precious time

[goose]

brainless...even he doesn't expect a wicket

[Tattieboy]

That's why 

[Shunya]

Ishant Sharma looked disinterested. And he convinced Kohli that its a waste of time. 

[Trichromatic]

[WC2011INDIA]

Because the match is fixed. 

[shortbread]

Kohli needs a course in using DRS!

[Laaloo]

DRS is a waste of time

[Trichromatic]

3 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

DRS is a waste of time

Quote

46.5

Shami to de Kock, leg byes, FOUR, the umpire initially gave that as runs. Dodgy review from India. Shami is bowling from round the wicket, so it has to be at least on middle stump for the ball to hit the leg stump

 

[Gollum]

Happens sometimes, no need to make a big issue out of this brain fade.