Battle of young bowlers: Nagarkoti vs Mavi

[Pollack]

11 hours ago, Rightarmfast said:

Dude, Nagarkoti is an allrounder. Dont judge his batting based on this match.

Mavi is a better bat and a slightly better bowler than Nagarkoti atm. But obviously Nagarkoti has more pace so tremendous potential. So, both are superb tbh.

[Vk1]

Seeing the few balls that nagarkotti played I thought he is more of a dependable batsman like bhuvi and not a hitter? But if you can bowl 145 you have strong shoulders and can be a good hitter with some practise.

[Rightarmfast]

Tbh, we can just do with 2 express fast 150+ bowlers. I would want them to be lethal bowlers bowling at 150+, rather than try being an allrounder.

[CoverDrive]

Obviously it is impossible to compare as they are different bowlers and both are doing equally well. Mavi seems to be more hit the deck bowler who will do well in bouncy conditions while Nagarkoti seems to have more swing and skiddy bowler like Steyn. 

[mancalledsting]

I think Nagarkoti has tremendous potential, in the first game vs Australia, he was fantastic. In subsequent games, seems like he still getting to know and understand his game, experimenting etc. Mavi on the other hand seems to be very aware of his strong points and keeps it simple and sticks to that- hence why he may appear more potent in recent games. I believe ultimately however, when Nagarkoti find his strengths, he will be the superior bowler. 

[abc]

22 hours ago, Cricketics said:

I would like to see how they both do in Vijay Hazare trophy on Pattas. It will be an interesting Vijay Hazare trophy in a long time. Probably the most interesting in years.

 

Don't forget: Porel will be playing for Bengal too!

[rkt.india]

1 hour ago, mancalledsting said:

I think Nagarkoti has tremendous potential, in the first game vs Australia, he was fantastic. In subsequent games, seems like he still getting to know and understand his game, experimenting etc. Mavi on the other hand seems to be very aware of his strong points and keeps it simple and sticks to that- hence why he may appear more potent in recent games. I believe ultimately however, when Nagarkoti find his strengths, he will be the superior bowler. 

The difference is Nagarkoti lacks control with new ball at this point. Mavi has been good with both new and old.

[mancalledsting]

26 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

The difference is Nagarkoti lacks control with new ball at this point. Mavi has been good with both new and old.

agree- but this is because he is not willing to compromise on pace and hostility. His intention is to intimidate. Once he finds the control, whilst maintaining his pace he could become Lethal 

[Vijy]

neither was at their best today. felt that porel did better in the final.

[fineleg]

5 hours ago, Vijy said:

neither was at their best today. felt that porel did better in the final.

True, good potential, but let Nagarkoti and Mavi play a lot of A-tours and domestics during the next 12-18 months. And Ishan Porel too.

[Vijy]

8 minutes ago, fineleg said:

True, good potential, but let Nagarkoti and Mavi play a lot of A-tours and domestics during the next 12-18 months. And Ishan Porel too.

yes, they do have potential. I was just pointing out that mavi/nagar had an off-day. actually, even when koti had a relatively bad day, he bowled some nice off-cutters and some pacy deliveries (like that yorker which got him a wkt).