Arjun Tendulkar trains with Team India, gets tips from Shastri

[Shunya]

11 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

because he plays club cricket in England like and any club or Ranji bowler in India is.  Just Tendulkar can provide him facilities to play club cricket England, it does not become nepotism.   

So which other Indian under 19s are playing club cricket in England or how many unknown under 19s or under 16s you know plays alongside English International cricketers? Any idea?

[rkt.india]

24 minutes ago, Vilander said:

England team nets ? is a common man resource not got though position of power. ok.

Teams do need net bowlers and anyone available there does it. Recently we sent some bowlers from India to SA as net bowlers as SA did not provide enough good net bowlers and as I said Arjun plays club cricket in England, he is eligible to bowl to England nets like nay other club bowler, but others dont that limelight because they are not arjun tendulkar.

[rkt.india]

1 minute ago, Shunya said:

So which other Indian under 19s are playing club cricket in England or how many unknown under 19s or under 16s you know plays alongside English International cricketers? Any idea?

None. So? They dont because they cannot afford.  He can.  One i know was Atul Sharma who dared to see beyond India and played and trained in England. 

[Shunya]

1 hour ago, LORD_analyst said:

plz also  comment on favors for india cements -dhoni from srini , who vetoed to remove captaincy after 2 back-to-back whitewashes........don't just cry out by setting ur agenda - accept the absolute truth.

 

 also plz bring out favors for raina playing test matches in england under lord dhoni ....idiot.

lol... this guy is on loose... please send him to his dhoni rant thread...

[Laaloo]

1 hour ago, raki05 said:

Which is worse sachin's son bowling to international stars in nets  OR  mohit sharma bowling in wc , R P singh bowling in 2011 test series ,Raina getting chance ahead of Rahane in test or Jadeja playing and screwing india for 10 years international t20. 

Geez with those many examples of nepotism, you would think dhoni sycopanths would have learned the meaning of nepotism by now.

 

 

I mean you had a freaking bowler make a statement that he would jump from the 24th floor if asked to do so by thalaiva. That's worse than nepotism.

[Shunya]

8 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

None. So? They dont because they cannot afford.  He can.  One i know was Atul Sharma who dared to see beyond India and played and trained in England. 

Plenty of people even if they can afford will not be able to do this. 

And again, getting trained in any academy is personal prerogative...Tendulkar can hire 100 coaches for his son and train him as much as he likes... but from outside this does look like favouring/partiality/nepotism because other youngsters would not be getting exposure like Arjun would... 

[Vilander]

16 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

and just because Sachin can provide him the facility, it does not become nepotism because Sachin does not hold any position of power in England.

he does apparently from how he could arrange a ground visit for his boy and net bowling session

[Shunya]

1 hour ago, raki05 said:

You are asking same thing what i asked before. Question is, if it's every where why anyone surprised here and more so as every one pointed out bowling in nets will not make him great cricketer he still needs to score runs and take wkts in international, for survival, and even before that to get in to the national team. So how does bowling in nets has deprived someone more deserving. Just because it's Tendulkar son few people getting relentless, does they care to inquire it has never happened before where some of the bcci official or politician didn't do to help their keen.

Tendu Jnr will obviously be judged based on his performance when he plays, but as of now he is getting advantage over other 1000s of junior level players. 

And you seem to be justifying nepotism because bcci official or politicians did it for their keen. Hope this does not become a norm as you are saying or else everyone is fu.cked.

 

[Moochad]

Arjun Tendulkar will more likely get a game for India in teh middle order before KL Rahul 

[rkt.india]

6 minutes ago, Shunya said:

Plenty of people even if they can afford will not be able to do this. 

And again, getting trained in any academy is personal prerogative...Tendulkar can hire 100 coaches for his son and train him as much as he likes... but from outside this does look like favouring/partiality/nepotism because other youngsters would not be getting exposure like Arjun would... 

So if if they cant get that exposure, it does not become nepotism.  If England practiced at a ground where Arjun's club also plays, is it his fault? He isnt the only one who will be bowling to them.  There will be other net bowlers from the same club bowling to them as well, but it becomes news only because he is a Tendulkar.  Actually if you can afford, you can do anything. A no name like Atul Sharma played in England and got trained in US with the best Javelin coach. Similarly if you have some talent and money to go with it, you can easily find a club in England as they are plenty there and if you get into that club, you can easily get the chance to bowl to England team as well when they come play to that county ground, your club belongs too.  It is not unimaginable.  It happens in India as well, Himanshu Rakheja who did not play even for Haryana U19 or Ranji trophy, was coached by Ian Pont because he can afford the money and even bowled at Rajasthan Royals nets along with likes of Shaun Tait.  

[rkt.india]

40 minutes ago, Vilander said:

he does apparently from how he could arrange a ground visit for his boy and net bowling session

Abey yaar, do you understand club and country cricketers play at those same grounds where National team plays matches. He did not arrange anything.  Look if Indian team playing a match in Wankhede, they call local Mumbai bowlers to bowl at the nets, many bowlers will come and will bowl there. Same way if England or Indian team is practicing in London, they call local club bowlers as net bowlers, Arjun also came and bowled same way as any other net bowler because he belongs to the local club. Arjun is not the only net bowler bowled there, there will be many other called as net bowlers.  

Edited June 27, 2018 by rkt.india

[UrmiSinhaRay]

Geez with those many examples of nepotism, you would think dhoni sycopanths would have learned the meaning of nepotism by now.
 
 
I mean you had a freaking bowler make a statement that he would jump from the 24th floor if asked to do so by thalaiva. That's worse than nepotism.

Who is this idiot?

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

[Laaloo]

1 minute ago, UrmiSinhaRay said:

Who is this idiot?

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
 

 

 

 

[Switchblade]

1 minute ago, UrmiSinhaRay said:

Who is this idiot?

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
 

Ishant Sharma.

[UrmiSinhaRay]

 

 
 

Now I want to bang my head on the wall and die

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

[Vilander]

14 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Abey yaar, do you understand club and country cricketers play at those same grounds where National team plays matches. He did not arrange anything.  Look if Indian team playing a match in Wankhede, they call local Mumbai bowlers to bowl at the nets, many bowlers will come and will bowl there. Same way if England or Indian team is practicing in London, they call local club bowlers as net bowlers, Arjun also came and bowled same way as any other net bowler because he belongs to the local club. Arjun is not the only net bowler bowled there, there will many be other be called as net bowlers.  

Rkt, let us agree to disagree man. I do not think its just happenstance, i am sure there was an element of Tendulkar there. 

[raki05]

29 minutes ago, Shunya said:

Tendu Jnr will obviously be judged based on his performance when he plays, but as of now he is getting advantage over other 1000s of junior level players. 

And you seem to be justifying nepotism because bcci official or politicians did it for their keen. Hope this does not become a norm as you are saying or else everyone is fu.cked.

 

Man which world you are leaving in, favoritism is everywhere in India and as far as i know in most part of the world but seems you live in idle world. Anyway, He is getting chance in nets, so do you think is there any selection committee which selects net bowlers what is the criteria to get selected in net bowling do you have idea about those before claiming nepotism and bla bla? It just seems tendulkar is there in England and as his son accompany him there so he got a chance to bowl in nets and as someone pointed out Tendulkar has a house in England so reason seems obvious why he is there. BCCI din't took him on his own expenses and regarding bowling to english bowler in nets do you think ecb call indians junior cricketer for net practice. Tendulkar jr got chance coz he plays club cricket there .You can say he is privileged but calling it nepotism is exaggeration.  Playing useless cricketer in national team instead of deserving one is prime example of favoritism but it seems you have problem with a 17 year old getting chance in nets than 37 year old lengthening unnecessarily  and lot of his partial selection during his captaincy  time in international matches.

[rkt.india]

14 minutes ago, Vilander said:

Rkt, let us agree to disagree man. I do not think its just happenstance, i am sure there was an element of Tendulkar there. 

Element of Tendulkar will always be there, but it is not nepotism. You first need check the definition of nepotism first. Tendulkar supporting Arjun is like a father supporting his son in studies and spending on him to get him best college because he can afford.  It is not nepotism. 

 

look Simi Singh is playing for Ireland today. he was born in Punjab and played U17 cricket with Kohli. How did it happen? Was some nepotism? How did he reach Ireland, played club cricket there and bow bowling to Indian batsmen.

[rkt.india]

3 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Man which world you are leaving in, favoritism is everywhere in India and as far as i know in most part of the world but seems you live in idle world. Anyway, He is getting chance in nets, so do you think is there any selection committee which selects net bowlers what is the criteria to get selected in net bowling do you have idea about those before claiming nepotism and bla bla? It just seems tendulkar is there in England and as his son accompany him there so he got a chance to bowl in nets and as someone pointed out Tendulkar has a house in England so reason seems obvious why he is there. BCCI din't took him on his own expenses and regarding bowling to english bowler in nets do you think ecb call indians junior cricketer for net practice. Tendulkar jr got chance coz he plays club cricket there .You can say he is privileged but calling it nepotism is exaggeration.  Playing useless cricketer in national team instead of deserving one is prime example of favoritism but it seems you have problem with a 17 year old getting chance in nets than 37 year old lengthening unnecessarily  and lot of his partial selection during his captaincy  time in international matches.

and Arjun plays club cricket in England during summers and spend their time there every year.

[Vilander]

Just now, rkt.india said:

Element of Tendulkar will always be there, but it is not nepotism. You first need check the definition of nepotism first. Tendulkar supporting Arjun is like a father supporting his son in studies and spending on him to get him best college because he can afford.  It is not nepotism. 

 

look Simi Singh is playing for Ireland today. he was born in Punjab and played U17 cricket with Kohli. How did it happen? Was some nepotism? How did he reach Ireland, played club cricket there and bow bowling to Indian batsmen.

It is nepotism.  Because Tendulkar is arranging favors ( exceptional resources) for his son, through his work associations