Jump to content

Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.


Pandya is the next......  

59 members have voted

  1. 1. Pandya is the next.........



Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, fineleg said:

ER 6.17 when most bowlers ER 2+ today and IshSharma 1+

His first spell was OK - picked up 1 for 16 in 6 odd overs.  Went for a few in a couple of overs  later on- I felt he was pressing a bit, trying to make something happen in that middle session where nothing was happening for us.  His  bowling is clearly a work in progress.  Still you'd take that from your 5th bowler - he did chip in with a top order wicket after all.  

Link to comment
1 hour ago, zen said:

Yes. Has scored 50s in all the test series he has played at both home and away. Picked up wkts as the 5th bowler .... Won India an away test in Eng.  .... Can Curran win a test for Eng in Ind? 

 

Refresher:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did Pandya win a test for India in India. Curran has outplayed him and has looked much more potent with both bat and ball. This one of the finest allround performances we have seen from an allrounder in long long time. 

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I know, I was answering to question, can Curran win a test for England in India. So question to you who is better??

to early to say n compare, pandya has to improve a lot n he is showing improvement by every passing game

Curran test lies when he goes to Ind, SL, UAE, Aus (patta).....

 

Both are evry young in their career, lets compare after a point. Ppl compare Kohli n root n now the margin has grown n grown. Things change with time so to early to say anything

Link to comment
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Did Pandya win a test for India in India. Curran has outplayed him and has looked much more potent with both bat and ball. This one of the finest allround performances we have seen from an allrounder in long long time. 

He did against Afg, where scored 70 odd iirc 

 

and Pandya has already won us the last test match so don’t know why this constant attention on him and the need to prove every time for a youngster who has just started out in Tests .... have you appreciated any of his performances? 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
1 hour ago, sandeep said:

His first spell was OK - picked up 1 for 16 in 6 odd overs.  Went for a few in a couple of overs  later on- I felt he was pressing a bit, trying to make something happen in that middle session where nothing was happening for us.  His  bowling is clearly a work in progress.  Still you'd take that from your 5th bowler - he did chip in with a top order wicket after all.  

Those weren't acceptable bowling figures by any stretch of the imagination. Cook's wicket was lucky in an otherwise terrible performance with the ball. He should have bowled more overs than Ashwin, but was too erratic for Kohli to trust.

 

He doesn't need to do a lot. Just stick to a consistent line and length. Had absolutely no rythm today.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, shortbread said:

Those weren't acceptable bowling figures by any stretch of the imagination. Cook's wicket was lucky in an otherwise terrible performance with the ball. He should have bowled more overs than Ashwin, but was too erratic for Kohli to trust.

 

He doesn't need to do a lot. Just stick to a consistent line and length. Had absolutely no rythm today.

That’s fine. He is the fifth bowler who took a crucial wkt. Ashwin, a specialist with the ball, picked up wkts too

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, shortbread said:

Those weren't acceptable bowling figures by any stretch of the imagination. Cook's wicket was lucky in an otherwise terrible performance with the ball. He should have bowled more overs than Ashwin, but was too erratic for Kohli to trust.

 

He doesn't need to do a lot. Just stick to a consistent line and length. Had absolutely no rythm today.

Aur ek aa gaya - Scorecard analyst.  His first spell wasn't that bad - did you watch the game or are you just passing judgement on his "bowling figures".  Of course his runs conceded are dismal and unacceptable.  But that happens once in a while, and its affordable for him to 'press' and have such a bad spell when we were on top.  

Link to comment

For 1-2 bad overs in a 5-days game, if ppl have to post it as if it were criminal, it highlights the desperation :facepalm:

 

Be happy that after a long time, Ind has some material to work with to shape in to a good AR and when the player has performed in one way or the other in every series that he has played so far 

 

Support promising youngsters 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, zen said:

For 1-2 bad overs in a 5-days game, if ppl have to post it as if it were criminal, it highlights the desperation :facepalm:

 

Be happy that after a long time, Ind has some material to work with to shape in to a good AR and when the player has performed in one way or the other in every series that he has played so far 

 

Support promising youngsters 

It's not about the player or his merits anymore. It's about ego and proving yourself right, even when you aren't. 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, sandeep said:

It's not about the player or his merits anymore. It's about ego and proving yourself right, even when you aren't. 

True and when they are not even experts on the subject .... many of them don’t even appreciate good performances by the player. Probably take Pandya doing well as a personal loss :lol: .... And they post desperately as if the team management is listening to us

 

We know that Pandya is likely to get the full series and is a promising youngster so why not support him 

 

Link to comment
26 minutes ago, zen said:

That’s fine. He is the fifth bowler who took a crucial wkt. Ashwin, a specialist with the ball, picked up wkts too

No he's the seam bowling all rounder who should have done the job on a day 1 pitch but miserably failed. Thankfully England's innings did not last a day or the 3 main quickies would have been burdened with longer spells.

Link to comment
Just now, shortbread said:

No he's the seam bowling all rounder who should have done the job on a day 1 pitch but miserably failed. Thankfully England's innings did not last a day or the 3 main quickies would have been burdened with longer spells.

2-3 bad overs in a 5-days game mean nothing ....  if you want to write against Pandya, you will have to wait for now

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, zen said:

True and when they are not even experts on the subject .... many of them don’t even appreciate good performances by the player. Probably take Pandya doing well as a personal loss :lol: .... And they post desperately as if the team management is listening to us

 

We know that Pandya is likely to get the full series and is a promising youngster so why not support him 

 

The guy is averaging close to 10 runs higher with the bat and 8 runs lower with the ball than Ben Stokes. But apparently  his performance is unacceptable and terrible. 

 

Kuch bhi

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...