India currently has best bowling line up in world

[R!TTER]

Just now, Trichromatic said:

Read the thread title (it doesn't say greatest line up in history of cricket FYI) and mention the name of better line ups if you disagree.

So you're saying a lineup that was outbowled in SA, Eng, one that always does well in Asia, not in Aus or NZ is the best in the world? How did you deduce the best ever, invisible inference?

Edited August 19, 2018 by R!TTER

[Trichromatic]

Just now, R!TTER said:

So you're saying a lineup that was outbowled in SA, Eng, one that always does well in Asia, nor in Aus or NZ is the best in the world? How did you deduce the best ever, invisible inference?

What's the point of mentioning it?

[CG]

Offcourse India has spinners and fast bowlers ,good swing bowlers and a good wrist spinner.Allround it's the best attack .

[Trichromatic]

Just now, CG said:

Offcourse India has spinners and fast bowlers ,good swing bowlers and a good wrist spinner.Allround it's the best attack .

And this reflects in their performances too.

[R!TTER]

Just now, Trichromatic said:

What's the point of mentioning it?

Because SA regularly outbowl us in 5 or 6 nations outside Asia, yet we are the best?

[Trichromatic]

6 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

Because SA regularly outbowl us in 5 or 6 nations outside Asia, yet we are the best?

5 or 6 nations outside Asia?

 

SA attack is better in SA, Aus and NZ only. 

[R!TTER]

Just now, Trichromatic said:

5 or 6 nations outside Asia?

 

SA attack is better in SA, Aus and NZ only. 

They're also better in Eng, WI and Zim. Last year the pitches weren't as seam friendly as this, or did you forget that?

[CG]

Because SA regularly outbowl us in 5 or 6 nations outside Asia, yet we are the best?

Sa struggled in eng.With Morkel gone Steyn struggling with injury,Philander on last legs.Sa will struggle except rabada who is best bowler in world.

[R!TTER]

Just now, CG said:

Just now, R!TTER said:

Because SA regularly outbowl us in 5 or 6 nations outside Asia, yet we are the best?

Sa struggled in eng.With Morkel gone Steyn struggling with injury,Philander on last legs.Sa will struggle except rabada who is best bowler in world.

Yes because they didn't have Philander, Steyn, AB and Rabada - in one of the tests. Do you honestly believe SA first choice attack is worse than India on all surfaces?

[CG]

Yes because they didn't have Philander, Steyn, AB and Rabada - in one of the tests. Do you honestly believe SA first choice attack is worse than India on all surfaces?

Sa were poor in srilanka ,it's close between with SA and India but with variety of spin makes india just ahead.

[R!TTER]

Just now, CG said:

Just now, R!TTER said:

Yes because they didn't have Philander, Steyn, AB and Rabada - in one of the tests. Do you honestly believe SA first choice attack is worse than India on all surfaces?

Sa were poor in srilanka ,it's close between with SA and India but with variety of spin makes india just ahead.

Decentish, they did better than Aus who were Starc or bust. This was also the first tour for everyone bar Steyn and Philander. They had the same problem as India, batters were crap.

[CG]

Decentish, they did better than Aus who were Starc or bust. This was also the first tour for everyone bar Steyn and Philander. They had the same problem as India, batters were crap.

Steyn is finished,Morkel is gone, Philander is on last legs.Sa will struggle going forward and it was India's catching that let them down other wise India would have won in SA.

[Gollum]

Deal with it haters.

[rkt.india]

1 hour ago, R!TTER said:

Did you forget the last game, what happened at Lords? The results are highly conditions dependent, also scoreboard pressure.

Had we played one more pacer instead of Kuldeep, things could have been different there too. England were 130/5 when playing twp spinners proved a blunder.

[Clarke]

Bump

 

Imtehan ki ghadi aa gayi

 

Best bowling attack struggled against Aus C, lets see how it does against Aus B in the tests.

[Vijy]

If Aus and SA had all their pacers in peak form, they are better in my book. Pattinson, Hazelwood, Cummins and Starc versus Steyn, Rabada, Lungi and some random 4th pacer. Pak pacers did pretty badly in Oz and I feel Eng has too many allrounders but not enough genuine all-round pacers barring Anderson. Would put India at 3 (in the best case scenario).

Edited November 30, 2018 by Vijy

[Trichromatic]

2 hours ago, Clarke said:

Bump

 

Imtehan ki ghadi aa gayi

 

Best bowling attack struggled against Aus C, lets see how it does against Aus B in the tests.

Wow! You call it a bold thread. 

[nitinbwj]

Really !!!! Looking at the practice match ...

[Clarke]

7 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Wow! You call it a bold thread. 

Yep, u can look at the doubts among the fans. But we certainly hope this becomes the undisputed truth by some measure. 

[GautiMaan]

Just like the batting is useless without Kohli bowling is useless without Bumrah