Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The same old commentary is happening with Modi as well. Intolerance debate. This thread is to expose the MSM's criticism of him. They were after him just like they do now. Today, everybody has flowery praises for him, they are vicious with their ecosystem set up by Congress.

 

 

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
1 minute ago, diga said:

Flipping through the channels at prime time and every channel paying tribute to the legacy of vajpayee except for ndtv still hankering on 2002.. 

Cnn Awaz also having buffoons and morons saying that Bjp’s Nehru passed away.Barkha,Shekhar Gupta,Sagarika or Rajdeep being moronic as always at least have some shame or conscience for at least a day :facepalm:

Posted
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

The same old commentary is happening with Modi as well. Intolerance debate. This thread is to expose the MSM's criticism of him. They were after him just like they do now. Today, everybody has flowery praises for him, they are vicious with their ecosystem set up by Congress.

Only last year I got to know that this condescending prick Karan thapar was the son of disgraced general of 1962 Indo-China war Prannath Thapar.. not only that Romila Thapar is his sister. Can one expect these two to be unbiased?

Posted

That is why this current form of Congress needs to be eradicated

That old hag Italian bitiach called Vajpayee a Gaddar and plenty of other insults

Cant wait the day the witch and her retarded son run away from India to Naples or whatever Italian sh!thole they crawled out from 

Posted

This whole gang of Chrislamocommies in our politics and the media is like cancer. You can't even expect a few words of decency from these vermin after the death of AB Vajpayee.

Its not blood which is flowing in the veins of Thapar, Kavita Krishnan, Barkha, Sanjay Jha it is poison. Difference in opinion & ideologies is understandable but such hate present inside them is just beyond me.

Posted
3 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

They don't even leave him at peace after his demise. Commies/UrbanNaxals are pure evil..

 

https://twitter.com/JagratiShukla29/status/1030075068267749382

 

 

He allegedly eats beef which he has denied all his life. Atalji and Brajesh both are dead to refute this bogus claim.

 

Look at this nutcase..

 

 

 

 

 

So what if he ate beef? Does that make him any less of a leader, PM or person?  

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Brainfade said:

So what if he ate beef? Does that make him any less of a leader, PM or person?  

WHy claim it, when he has denied it? They know that there is a beef controversy going on. This is a back-handed compliment to ABV and a slap to BJP/Sanghis saying he was a liberal. They are owning him now, while for them in his PM days, he was as RW as Modi is now. So, they should all STFU. 

 

https://www.telegraphindia.com/1030221/asp/nation/story_1693977.asp

 

They are uttering an outright lie and it should be called out.

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted (edited)

nation has paid dearly for not choosing ABV in 2004. Modi is trying to undo all that but the roots of this filth called congress/commies go far deeper than we could ever imagine. These guys have long reach. The best way to treat them is by keeping them outside the power and make sure burnol factorys are shut.

 

Honestly i enjoyed May 16 of 2014 so much that i could see smoke coming out from everywhere. We need to continue that.  

Edited by dial_100
Posted

2019 is going to be an ugly battle.. For the p-secs & the congis, its a battle for survival.

 

Its very difficult to fathom what they are planning as they rarely come out of their holes..

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

WHy claim it, when he has denied it? They know that there is a beef controversy going on. This is a back-handed compliment to ABV and a slap to BJP/Sanghis saying he was a liberal. They are owning him now, while for them in his PM days, he was as RW as Modi is now. So, they should all STFU. 

 

https://www.telegraphindia.com/1030221/asp/nation/story_1693977.asp

 

They are uttering an outright lie and it should be called out.

Fair enough.  It is likely that they are lying simply to make him look bad in the eyes of Hindus.

 

The larger point is that, if he did have a taste for beef, he shouldn't have to deny it for fear of one religious group or another shunning him.  Would it be okay if he ate fish, lamb, pork or chicken?  Why?  Why not?

 

What if someone was offended if he had a drink every night? In some families and cultures, alcohol is considered immoral ("Ayyo, yeNNe hodithaananthe guru.  Paapishta nan maga").  

 

In short, what do his dietary preferences have to do with governance?  It is no different than radical Christians or Muslims putting religious beliefs above national interest in other parts of the world.

Edited by Brainfade
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brainfade said:

Fair enough.  It is likely that they are lying simply to make him look bad in the eyes of Hindus.

 

The larger point is that, if he did have a taste for beef, he shouldn't have to deny it for fear of one religious group or another shunning him.  Would it be okay if he ate fish, lamb, pork or chicken?  Why?  Why not? In short, what do his dietary preferences have to do with governance?  It is no different than radical Christians or Muslims putting religious beliefs above national interest in other parts of the world.

It seems to be of no consequence already. The kind of adulation he got despite knowing his vices (as per Hindu Brahmins in general) is  proof enough that it will not matter to large number of his supporters. But, these journalists try to bring it up every time ABV is mentioned. BBC/WaPo went to the extent of making him a tipsy drunkard and a womanizer. But the man himself is denying that he had beef, but they are lying through their teeth without any conscience.  

 

Veer Savarkar was an atheist as well, but he believed in Hindu cultural nationalism, and is revered by all chaddis/sanghis!

 

×
×
  • Create New...