Jump to content

Imran Khan on cancellation of talks: ‘India’s response arrogant, negative… small men occupying big offices’


Recommended Posts

Posted

He is just a puppet who is adept in taking U-turns. A few years back he was cursing the army & now with its help became the PM.

I sometimes wonder what would have been Imran's legacy if that group match in 1992 WC between EngVsPak in which Pak was dismissed for 74 hadn't been washed out,when they were on verge of exit.No tag of WC winning captain to hog limelight & launching himself into politics. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Turning_track said:

He is just a puppet who is adept in taking U-turns. A few years back he was cursing the army & now with its help became the PM.

I sometimes wonder what would have been Imran's legacy if that group match in 1992 WC between EngVsPak in which Pak was dismissed for 74 hadn't been washed out,when they were on verge of exit.No tag of WC winning captain to hog limelight & launching himself into politics. 

 

There's a reason why they call him Taliban Khan. He has been known as a terrorist sympathizer for quite some time now. 

I don't understand why do we even entertain such chewts in the first place. He is a braindead inbred with a mental capacity of 5 year old. 

Let him bark.

Posted

Begger mentality on display here -> beg first, when the other party says “move on”, start cursing :lol:

 

Anyways, Ind needs to get back PoK which includes Galgit Balistan. At this point, it would be only possible through a war so talks are pointless 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, zen said:

Begger mentality on display here -> beg first, when the other party says “move on”, start cursing :lol:

 

Anyways, Ind needs to get back PoK which includes Galgit Balistan. At this point, it would be only possible through a war so talks are pointless 

 

Had our previous leaders been more pragmatic in their approach & not myopic, we shouldn't be discussing about PoK .
Be it Shastri, Indira or Vajpayee - each one of them left the job unfinished & showed pity expecting that the adversary will reciprocate goodwill .

Posted
1 hour ago, zen said:

Begger mentality on display here -> beg first, when the other party says “move on”, start cursing :lol:

 

Anyways, Ind needs to get back PoK which includes Galgit Balistan. At this point, it would be only possible through a war so talks are pointless 

 

That'll be devastating for the nation and the economy. It's foolish to wish for a full fledged war.. 

Posted
1 minute ago, BlueBee said:

That'll be devastating for the nation and the economy. It's foolish to wish for a full fledged war.. 

Which is why Ind does not believe in meaningless talks as at this point a solution is through war which Ind is not interested in 

Posted
2 hours ago, zen said:

Begger mentality on display here -> beg first, when the other party says “move on”, start cursing :lol:

 

Anyways, Ind needs to get back PoK which includes Galgit Balistan. At this point, it would be only possible through a war so talks are pointless 

 

 

both countries will be happy to maintain status quo..

dont think abt the possibility of a full scale war

Posted
14 minutes ago, velu said:

 

both countries will be happy to maintain status quo..

dont think abt the possibility of a full scale war

If the 'other country' was happy to maintain status quo, we wouldn't have found ourselves dealing with insurgency and Terrorism in Kashmir since decades.

Wake up and smell the coffee Velu. Don't believe everything they claim on Pakpassion.

Posted

befitting response to what india uttered about PM Khan last night...

(Im sure most of people commenting here don't even know the whole background)

Posted
4 minutes ago, Asim said:

befitting response to what india uttered about PM Khan last night...

(Im sure most of people commenting here don't even know the whole background)

I don't remember Modi commenting anything on it, or did he?

Imran's tweet is clearly a jibe at Indian PM.

×
×
  • Create New...