There is no one matching Hardik Pandya’s abilities in India: MSK Prasad

[rkt.india]

3 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Both Pandya brothers can share 10 overs

yes and Krunal is a damn good LOI bowler.

[zen]

17 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Hardik Pandya should be 6th bowler in ODI, batting in top 6.  he can easily be a #6 bat in ODIs like Stokes does for England.  

 

11 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Both Pandya brothers can share 10 overs

 

Exactly, if we have a couple of ARs, they can combine to bowl the 5th bowlers quota and also chip in with extra overs if one of the 4 specialist bowlers has a bad day 

 

Talking about Pandya brothers, both of them are good enough to bat at either 6 or 7 depending upon form, match situation, etc. 

[prasen82]

Play both pandya brothers and play Kuldeep,bumrah and khaleel.

 

Will give a great batting tail.

[Tendulkar1996]

3 hours ago, prasen82 said:

Play both pandya brothers and play Kuldeep,bumrah and khaleel.

 

Will give a great batting tail.

Good joke.Both krunal and khaleel are massively overrated and will be crushed by strong batting line ups.

[Rightarmfast]

1 hour ago, Tendulkar1996 said:

Good joke.Both krunal and khaleel are massively overrated and will be crushed by strong batting line ups.

Khaleel will develop with time. Whereas Krunal, I agree will be cannon fodder. Against genuine pace and quality attack, his batting will be tested no ends 

[Khota]

8 hours ago, zen said:

Let's not make caveman like comments where despite a player scoring a 100 and bowling at 140+, you want to "act" as if he does not do that  

 

Anyways, enjoy:

 

Just like a caveman you are getting your news from Prehistoric Times.

 

140 + does not make him a bowler. Big difference.

Few shots here and there does not make him a batsman. Big difference.

When he bowls he looks like the worst. When he bats he looks better than tailenders.

[Switchblade]

8 hours ago, Rightarmfast said:

MSK keeps proving everyday why he doesn’t belong in the selectors chair. The guy is a clown.

The first thing is, being a selector, you can’t make such careless and umbrella statements, that too clearly favouring one player over others. He needs to be taught what kind of statements he can make.

 

Pandya at best is a T20 player, nothing beyond that. If the selectors are happy with one performance once every 10 matches, I wonder where the standard of indian cricket has fallen down to. 

 

 

 

[zen]

1 hour ago, Khota said:

Just like a caveman you are getting your news from Prehistoric Times.

 

140 + does not make him a bowler. Big difference.

Few shots here and there does not make him a batsman. Big difference.

When he bowls he looks like the worst. When he bats he looks better than tailenders.

And sun revolves around the earth too I guess per your tribe

[prasen82]

2 hours ago, Khota said:

Just like a caveman you are getting your news from Prehistoric Times.

 

140 + does not make him a bowler. Big difference.

Few shots here and there does not make him a batsman. Big difference.

When he bowls he looks like the worst. When he bats he looks better than tailenders.

 

what are the pandya alternatives. big striker who can bowl decent medium pace?

[prudent_kreeda]

2 hours ago, Khota said:

Just like a caveman you are getting your news from Prehistoric Times.

 

140 + does not make him a bowler. Big difference.

Few shots here and there does not make him a batsman. Big difference.

When he bowls he looks like the worst. When he bats he looks better than tailenders.

    Give me one  indian name  who you think better than Hardik so that we can replace him right now. 

    If you do not have , then you have to go by what you have . 

     

Edited October 28, 2018 by prudent_kreeda

[UnknownGenius]

Just because you bowl 140+ doesn't make you a good bowler. Umesh phaast Yadav bowls well above that and is one of the worst ODI bowlers Eve

 

People like zen need to take a step back and understand basic cricket first...

[UnknownGenius]

2 hours ago, Khota said:

Just like a caveman you are getting your news from Prehistoric Times.

 

140 + does not make him a bowler. Big difference.

Few shots here and there does not make him a batsman. Big difference.

When he bowls he looks like the worst. When he bats he looks better than tailenders.

Don't let him troll you. He is the same guy who said he expects Kohli and rahane to score same number of runs in test series in Australia

 

That should tell you all about his cricket knowledge or lack thereof

[zen]

3 hours ago, UnknownGenius said:

He is the same guy who said he expects Kohli and rahane to score same number of runs in test series in Australia

I don’t .... but as a SENA specialist and someone who hints at wanting to be the best, I would “allocate” similar number of runs to him as he scored last time and not over burden Kohli (reduce Kohli's allocation) 

Edited October 28, 2018 by zen

[Lannister]

And why do we need Pandya in Test cricket? Do these guys even review players' performances? They have this one idea and just follow it blindly.

[Khota]

4 hours ago, prasen82 said:

 

what are the pandya alternatives. big striker who can bowl decent medium pace?

In England series it should have been a pure batsman. Needs will changed depending on the game but half assing batting or bowling does not work at that level.

[Khota]

4 hours ago, UnknownGenius said:

Just because you bowl 140+ doesn't make you a good bowler. Umesh phaast Yadav bowls well above that and is one of the worst ODI bowlers Eve

 

People like zen need to take a step back and understand basic cricket first...

He knows it all. Anyone who an write that someone bowls at 140+ is a good bowler shows his lack  of understanding of the game. Very immature statement on his part. What makes it worst is that he has doubled down on it.

[Khota]

4 hours ago, prasen82 said:

 

what are the pandya alternatives. big striker who can bowl decent medium pace?

Either a pure batsman or a pure bowler. At that level you cannot have one do it all.

[Khota]

4 hours ago, UnknownGenius said:

Don't let him troll you. He is the same guy who said he expects Kohli and rahane to score same number of runs in test series in Australia

 

That should tell you all about his cricket knowledge or lack thereof

Zen is a gifted stupid.

[zen]

27 minutes ago, Khota said:

He knows it all. Anyone who an write that someone bowls at 140+ is a good bowler shows his lack  of understanding of the game. Very immature statement on his part. What makes it worst is that he has doubled down on it.

Of course I know it all .... including the cavemanesque qualities I see in some posters .... nobody has said Pandya is a good or bad bowler yet. Just that he can bowl at 140+, which when combined with his batting and fielding talent, makes him an useful cricketer and a game changer in certain aspects (won us a test with the ball for e.g.)

 

It is you who is acting as if he did not hit 100s and cannot bowl at 140+ .... when you got exposed, you tried to turn it into a how good or bad he is which is a separate discussion and relative to other options  .... so accept that he can hit 100s and bowls at 140+ 

Edited October 28, 2018 by zen

[zen]

1 hour ago, Khota said:

Zen is a gifted stupid.

Good to see relics spring out of their caves when a discussion on Pandya is on .... keep the comedy on! 

 

 

^

Edited October 28, 2018 by zen