rtmohanlal Posted December 9, 2018 Author Share Posted December 9, 2018 Another plus point of Jadeja is that he is not a mental midget. In the last AUS series at home he was going thru a rough patch with bat. Come the 3rd test he started to find his rhythm. With the series level at 1-1 and AUS putting 300 in the 4rth test, India soon is in disarray at 221-6. In comes Jadeja with no specialist batsman left and takes score to 317 with him scoring 63 of only 95 balls. India takes a vital 32 run lead which eventually helps in winning the series 2-1.That was the most crucial point in the series. Had he got out cheaply IND would have folded soon conceding a handful lead.In doing so the team would even have lost the match and there by the series. Another point is the 86* in ENG. When got that rare oppertunity abroad he rose to the occasion. And even more praiseworthy was the manner in which he scored the majority of those 86 runs in the company of tail enders.Had he got out cheaply, his chances of playing any further matches in SENA would have been shut down perhaps forever. All these shows, he has it in him to overcome tough match situations. More over , being a gun bowler also helps in that he can bat with utmost confidence at the crease , being well aware of the fact that even if he fails with the bat he can rely on his other discipline to contribute to the team cause in one way or the other.That can eases out pressure a lot which eventually can result in him performing well in both disciplines. But he needs to be given a permanent string of chances to prove his mettle. Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 9 hours ago, rtmohanlal said: Jadeja has a domestic record that losses in nothing when compared to that of Vihari.It is only a conclusion derived from a prejudiced mentality that Jadeja lacks the credentials required of a top 6 batsman. His huge success as a bowler doesn't help his cause either. But the reality is that he plays as a front line batsman for his domestic team. And ever since he started getting into his groove as a batsman , he avg:s 50+ in tests, in the last 2 years precisely.So this guy deserves his chances especially because every Rohit,Kartik,Dhawan,Rahul get chances after chances despite repeatedly proving to be far from adequate to be a permanent member of the 'TOP 6' of this team. More over Jadeja is a left hander too Have you even checked the factual records. There is significant difference of 12.36 runs per innings in FC batting average between that of Vihari (59.48) and Jadeja (47.12). Which records did you check before making such an outrageous statement that Jadeja is better than Vihari in long format ? Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted December 10, 2018 Author Share Posted December 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Straight Drive said: Have you even checked the factual records. There is significant difference of 12.36 runs per innings in FC batting average between that of Vihari (59.48) and Jadeja (47.12). Which records did you check before making such an outrageous statement that Jadeja is better than Vihari in long format ? i said 'domestic' not 'first class'. 'first class' includes tests also . So remove test record from that first class data. Jadeja avg:s almost 56 in domestic alone.. Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said: i said 'domestic' not 'first class'. 'first class' includes tests also . So remove test record from that first class data. Jadeja avg:s almost 56 in domestic alone.. What he does in domestic cricket is irrelevant as he has already been given a chance for 39 tests wherein he averages 32.44 There have been Bopara's, Mark Ramprakash, Vikram rathours and many more who have rocked domestic circuit but have been total failures once they ahve been asked to bat a level higher. Jadeja too is a similar case as far as his batting is concerned. To have a batsman averaging 32.44 is just not going to happen. Never will we see Jadeja being asked to bat at 6 unless one of those battign above him are retired hurt / injured or a night watchman is required. Vihari has played just one test. We have not seen whether he too like Jadeja will fail to perform at test level like he does at domestic level. That is something for a discussion after he plays significant tests like Jadeja. I have watched both bat and imo Vihari is much better batsman than Jadeja, fine if you feel otherwise. Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted January 4, 2019 Author Share Posted January 4, 2019 Proving his mettle by the day.... In Melbourne test picked 5 wkts @ <25 avg: , all of which are that of top 7 batsmen , including that of Khawaja their best batsman. Now an 81 @71.05 str: rate. Surprised , what more does he need to be a permanent member of this team??? . His is the case of a genuine top order batsman being made a scape goat to 'slog out' and harm serious damage to his figures as we saw in the Melbourne test where as certain passengers are given chances after chances for nothing. Moving forward he deserves the 6th spot for sure. He has all the shots in the book as we saw even today. That 4 fours in one over of their best fast bowler Cummins was the icing on the cake and also an emphatic statement for his cause. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Agree with Sandeep. We need to actually worry about making sure guys like Vihari are played regularlya nd so hence at this time, we can’t think of promoting Jadeja in our wildest dreams. He should do the same job what Ashwin did for us in last few years as a lower order batsman whom we can rely a bit on. Nothing more than that. Let him show some grand consistency there. I just hope he is able to perform with the ball like I expect him to overseas and he should have seard the fea then for our next overseas swing. He is too good a bowler to not win India matches overseas. He has a fifer in South Africa for a reason. flamy 1 Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted January 4, 2019 Author Share Posted January 4, 2019 13 minutes ago, Cricketics said: Agree with Sandeep. We need to actually worry about making sure guys like Vihari are played regularlya nd so hence at this time, we can’t think of promoting Jadeja in our wildest dreams. He should do the same job what Ashwin did for us in last few years as a lower order batsman whom we can rely a bit on. Nothing more than that. Let him show some grand consistency there. I just hope he is able to perform with the ball like I expect him to overseas and he should have seard the fea then for our next overseas swing. He is too good a bowler to not win India matches overseas. He has a fifer in South Africa for a reason. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/234675.html?class=1;spanmin1=22+sep+2016;spanval1=span;template=results;type=batting the guy avg:es 45 in the last 3 years or so. He has scored 10 of his 11 50+ scores during this period including his lone 100. Even if the avg: is inflated a bit by high number of not outs , it is easily worth a 41 for a normal avg: . Has a str: of 66+ for a game changer. This , despite the fact that he more often than in general has to throw his bat at any thing for getting quick runs for the team. Sure his avg: would have been a lot better had he been in the position of a normal 5th or 6th batsman( not sacrifice his wkt by slogging for the sake of the team).What more do we need to realize about his credentials for the top order spot??. Link to comment
zen Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Jadeja minus his bowling will not be in the squad .... is this about playing a bowler as a batsman? Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Even Pant is batting at 7. How can Jadeja at at 6. No way. Link to comment
Clarke Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 I hope this series settles Jadeja ahead of Ashwin at 8 when we play a lone spinner. Stradlater and express bowling 2 Link to comment
express bowling Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Jadeja should be our first choice spinner, in tests outside Asia, from now on. And bat at either 8 or 7. Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted January 5, 2019 Author Share Posted January 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Straight Drive said: Even Pant is batting at 7. How can Jadeja at at 6. No way. the likes of Dhawan,Rahul,Rohit,Kartik,Rahane etc has been playing above 7 for extended stretches of time. So if they can be given this much chances why Jadeja can't be? Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 8 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said: the likes of Dhawan,Rahul,Rohit,Kartik,Rahane etc has been playing above 7 for extended stretches of time. So if they can be given this much chances why Jadeja can't be? Would you post the playing 11 in batting order that you want. Just trying to understand your plan as far as team is concerned Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted January 5, 2019 Author Share Posted January 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Straight Drive said: Would you post the playing 11 in batting order that you want. Just trying to understand your plan as far as team is concerned I am not going that far.... Just saying that if the proven inadequate names that I specified earlier can play these much number of matches based on their domestic credentials, Jadeja too deserves his chances up the order based on the same criteria of domestic credentials . That, he has been a brilliant bowler till date only raises his claims much more , not vice versa.To add to all these ,he has emphatically proven in batting in the last three years of his career , even at abroad.So what more do you need to atleast provide him with a few chances at 6th slot??? If Rahane,Rahul,Rohit,Kartik,Dhwan all could get chances in the first 6 batting slots, what is that preventing Jadeja getting his fair share of chances???? Link to comment
Khota Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Not the way he is playing. He deserves it. Link to comment
ThePhenomenal1 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Ive been saying for time now that Jadeja is better than ashwin. even at home against england in 2016, he got us the 4th test wickets on a flattish pitch. Kumble seems to have helped him on line, length, variations, flight etc. Brilliant fielder, gives it his all in tests. Batting at 8 gives us great depth. However should remain a test player, dont believe he has the matchwinning ability in odis Khota 1 Link to comment
rtmohanlal Posted January 5, 2019 Author Share Posted January 5, 2019 16 minutes ago, ThePhenomenal1 said: Ive been saying for time now that Jadeja is better than ashwin. even at home against england in 2016, he got us the 4th test wickets on a flattish pitch. Kumble seems to have helped him on line, length, variations, flight etc. Brilliant fielder, gives it his all in tests. Batting at 8 gives us great depth. However should remain a test player, dont believe he has the matchwinning ability in odis He at least deserves his chances at 6th spot. First of all, him being a spinner means playing as a specialist batsman is not going to physically affect his bowling.Secondly his success as spinner means he can bat with the added confidence that his place in the team is assured as a bowler alone .This can result in him performing brilliantly with the bat also there by being the Shakib Al Hassan of our team.And there are enough evidences only of him succeeding in that role rather than vice versa. Link to comment
goose Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Jadeja is always in my XI home and away. Link to comment
prasen82 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 (edited) I don't know. Odis require piercing gaps. I found jadeja to actually struggle there. The best folks we have right now for that are jadhav and Karthik, but team balance is screwed. I would play jadeja instead of chahal. The biggest problem is dhoni who is screwing up team combo and not allowing us to experiment. Number 5 and 6 needs to be chosen between pant, KDK and Rayudu and Jadhav. Jadeja is number 7 in odis and number 8 in tests. If you watched the test yesterday there were at least half a dozen balls which should have been dispatched to boundary but went to the fielder. Edited January 5, 2019 by prasen82 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now