Khota Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 Today the worst bowler was the so called All-orunder: BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB B Kumar 5 0 20 0 4.00 22 4 0 0 0 Mohammed Shami 6 2 19 3 3.16 28 3 0 1 0 V Shankar 4 0 19 0 4.75 15 3 0 0 0 YS Chahal 10 0 43 2 4.30 33 4 0 1 0 Kuldeep Yadav 10 1 39 4 3.90 36 1 2 0 0 Among the guys who were supposed to bowl the all rounder yielded the most runs. Let us keep a tab on all the all rounders.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 damn now their is an issue with 4.75 economy, shows how badly OP is trying to prove his point bowl_out, zen and Switchblade 2 1
zen Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: damn now their is an issue with 4.75 economy, shows how badly OP is trying to prove his point the logic appears to be that the if an AR is doing 5th bowler's duties, he should be better than the 4 specialist bowlers .... if instead of the AR, the 5th specialist bowler is playing and goes for more runs, it is ok Edited January 23, 2019 by zen BrantFUGH 1
Khota Posted January 24, 2019 Author Posted January 24, 2019 No wickets either. Must be a coincidence.
philcric Posted January 24, 2019 Posted January 24, 2019 (edited) Should ICF have some kind of an entrance test of general aptitude and cricket knowledge before the members are allowed to post ? Some of the posters and posts are downright embarrassing, from a cricket forum perspective. Edited January 24, 2019 by philcric Vilander, Vk1, Switchblade and 4 others 7
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 24, 2019 Posted January 24, 2019 4 hours ago, Khota said: No wickets either. Must be a coincidence. even bhuvi didnt....and his only job is bowling Switchblade 1
Khota Posted January 24, 2019 Author Posted January 24, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: even bhuvi didnt....and his only job is bowling 4.00 vs 4.75. Scored the same no of runs as the allrounder. I get it. Edited January 24, 2019 by Khota Ridgepi 1
Khota Posted January 24, 2019 Author Posted January 24, 2019 7 hours ago, philcric said: Should ICF have some kind of an entrance test of general aptitude and cricket knowledge before the members are allowed to post ? Some of the posters and posts are downright embarrassing, from a cricket forum perspective. I agree. They should.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 24, 2019 Posted January 24, 2019 7 hours ago, Khota said: 4.00 vs 4.75. Scored the same no of runs as the allrounder. I get it. .75 eco doesnt make any diff.......its under 5 which is gold in modern cricket and lets not forget he is more of a batsman so his 2nd job was also way good Srly issue with 4.75 eco.....that is gold
Khota Posted January 25, 2019 Author Posted January 25, 2019 6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: .75 eco doesnt make any diff.......its under 5 which is gold in modern cricket and lets not forget he is more of a batsman so his 2nd job was also way good Srly issue with 4.75 eco.....that is gold If everyone else is closer to 4 and the allrounder is close to 5 there is a problem.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 3 hours ago, Khota said: If everyone else is closer to 4 and the allrounder is close to 5 there is a problem. .75 makes jackshit of a diff
bowl_out Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: .75 makes jackshit of a diff No point arguing on meaningless threads like this.. Ignore and move on.. That's the best reply to such stupid threads. Ridgepi 1
Khota Posted January 25, 2019 Author Posted January 25, 2019 6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: .75 makes jackshit of a diff 0.75 is the game right there. BrantFUGH, flamy and speedheat 2 1
Khota Posted January 25, 2019 Author Posted January 25, 2019 5 hours ago, bowl_out said: No point arguing on meaningless threads like this.. Ignore and move on.. That's the best reply to such stupid threads. Exactly right. No point of arguing. If an all rounder excels we will put his numbers here. There are lot of games to be played.
R!TTER Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Yes because he's actually an A/R & arguably the second best after Stokes, with his pace bowling being quite underrated even until just recently.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Holder batting 140* already has 2 wkts in 1st innings Imad wasim made 43 in 23 balls and till now the only bowler in the match bowling under 5 Eco philcric and Switchblade 2
philcric Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Ben Stokes 4/59 Jason Holder 2/15 Jason Holder 202* Ben Stokes 2/81 (off 25 overs when the batting team made 415/6 at 4 RPO) Terrible last couple of days for this joke of a thread express bowling and Switchblade 2
Khota Posted January 26, 2019 Author Posted January 26, 2019 I am glad people are keeping tab of all rounders from other countries which personally I don't give a frick about. I will stay focussed on India. This would be an eye opener for me when an allrounder pops up.
R!TTER Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 You mean the A/R - better than Sobers, faster than Imran & more destructive than Kapil
Khota Posted January 26, 2019 Author Posted January 26, 2019 Second ODI and the worst bowler was so called Aii rounder: BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB B Kumar 7 1 42 2 6.00 28 5 2 1 0 Mohammed Shami 6 0 43 1 7.16 20 4 2 0 0 V Shankar 2 0 17 0 8.50 5 3 0 1 0 YS Chahal 9.2 0 52 2 5.57 26 3 2 0 0 KM Jadhav 6 0 35 1 5.83 15 2 1 0 0 Kuldeep Yadav 10 0 45 4 4.50 33 3 1 0 0 Once again if an all rounder pops up I will eat a humble pie. This is not to undermine Shankar who people love on this board. Doestic stats are misleading if proper weigthing is not done. You do need proper bowlers. Shankar is a eample of a passenger.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now