Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Saini 4th over

 

134 ... outswinger  on off .. OUT caught

144 ... great yorker ... dot ball

140 ... rising short-ish ball ... 1 run

147 ... quick rising ball ... mistimed ... 1

140 ... good attempted yorker ... 1 

142 ... OUT caught ... batsman could not time it due to high pace of the ball

 

2 wickets and just 3 runs

 

Great over

 

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
1 hour ago, CSK Fan said:

Was at the stadium. Umesh looked way faster than siani. Shami also looked really sharp but the kings xi keeper was standing lot in front than parthiv

what was your perspective were you close to keepers end diagonal or behind the bowlers end ? 

 

its very interesting - may be Umesh and Shami skid through more because they are short, meaning the is faster at batsman's end.

Posted
7 hours ago, CSK Fan said:

Was at the stadium. Umesh looked way faster than siani. Shami also looked really sharp but the kings xi keeper was standing lot in front than parthiv

Saini is taller and gets more bounce. Shami and Umesh are shorter and skiddy bowlers maybe that's why they appear to be quicker.

Posted
7 hours ago, CSK Fan said:

Was at the stadium. Umesh looked way faster than siani. Shami also looked really sharp but the kings xi keeper was standing lot in front than parthiv

Saini is taller with high arm action. Ball has to travel more distance to reach the batsman. Shami and umesh shorter with round armish action. Less distance for ball to travel.

Posted
41 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Saini is taller with high arm action. Ball has to travel more distance to reach the batsman.

 

True.

 

41 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Shami and umesh shorter with round armish action. Less distance for ball to travel.

 

Shami does not have a round arm action.  His release points are on the higher side for his height.

×
×
  • Create New...