Jump to content

If there is no upper limit to bowler's quota in LoI cricket??


Recommended Posts

Posted

(Nothing out of the box, I am sure some of you wondered about this before.)

 

Would that make life harder for batsmen to score heavily or would we see even bigger scores?

 

For example if Rabada and Tahir together bowled 30 overs in an Odi or Bumrah and Kuldeep bowled 16 overs in a T20, it means that we can replace bits and pieces players like moeen ali or jadhav and go for more specialist batsmen.

 

On one hand there won't be laddoo fifth bowler like Hardik and sachin's strategy of picking on the runt of the attack won't work, because every bowler is a proper specialist. But at the same time we will play 7-8 proper specialist batsmen without compromising on their other bowling skill sets. If you observe every team these days plays only 4 specialist batsmen, 2 specialist bowlers and the rest are all-rounders or bits and pieces. 

 

Only genuine all-rounders will be picked and bits and pieces all-rounders will be discarded.

 

All in all cricket will move closer to baseball with this.

 

...

Share your feelings on this..

Posted

Ah my man. The game is unfair towards the bowlers but then a bowler can come back, a batsman cannot. I think it may make sense to limit the number of balls a batsman can play. That may make it fairer

Posted

Then batsmen should be allowed to bat even if he is out...will remove bits and pieces players like Jadhav out of the equation.

We can have playing 4 instead of playing 11

 

Kohli

Rohit

Bumrah

Kuldeep

 

And then random 7 spectators can come field.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...