Suhaan Posted January 22, 2020 Author Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 hour ago, express bowling said: Has anyone noticed at pace Arzan Nagswala was bowling at ? 114-118kph rock777, raki05, Mosher and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Suhaan said: 114-118kph Even if we add 5 kph, it is still 119 k to 123 k then. And such bowlers are running through sides. Speaks poorly of our FC cricket batsmen these days. raki05 and Mosher 2 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted January 22, 2020 Author Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, express bowling said: Even if we add 5 kph, it is still 119 k to 123 k then. And such bowlers are running through sides. Speaks poorly of our FC cricket batsmen these days. Offlate they have provided conditions which are heavily favouring bowlers like him,it had happened in pak domestics also,they used to serve green pitches which made swing bowlers run through sides and neither it helped batsmen to develop tendency to bat long and pile runs,it had a bad effect on batsmen and bowlers as when they came across balanced pitches their bowlers got exposed We should stay away from laying these kind of pitches where its heavily tilted towards bowlers ,it should be flat and bouncy with lit bit of movement as it will serve both purpose Edited January 22, 2020 by Suhaan rock777, express bowling, raki05 and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment
nsareen Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 sarfraz khan scoring a double century!! Link to comment
rkt.india Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, express bowling said: Even if we add 5 kph, it is still 119 k to 123 k then. And such bowlers are running through sides. Speaks poorly of our FC cricket batsmen these days. Unreliable speed guns then. Nagwaswalla bowls 130 plus, up to mid 130s. He is decently quick and swings the bowl into right handers. I had seen him last year. Has decent bouncer too. Even last he looked quicker than what speed guns were showing. Looked more in high 130s. Edited January 22, 2020 by rkt.india Link to comment
neel roy Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) Nitish Rana playing a blinder.Delhi going to win chasing improbable 300+.why is he not even discussed as a potential odi player-left handed,bowls well,calm,can hit sixes..surely better than jadhav sarfraz khan takes mumbai to lead..3 points Edited January 22, 2020 by neel roy Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 3 hours ago, nsareen said: sarfraz khan scoring a double century!! 300 bhi ho gaya raki05, tweaker and Mosher 1 1 1 Link to comment
neel roy Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Bombay Delhi both get improbable results..and points Link to comment
tweaker Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: 300 bhi ho gaya Against UP ,for which he played 2-3 seasons Link to comment
Vickydev Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 5 hours ago, rkt.india said: Unreliable speed guns then. Nagwaswalla bowls 130 plus, up to mid 130s. He is decently quick and swings the bowl into right handers. I had seen him last year. Has decent bouncer too. Even last he looked quicker than what speed guns were showing. Looked more in high 130s. Just caught the highlights of the first innings, the wickets of Sanvir, Gurkeerat, Abhisek and Anmolpreet were all 128-129 ks on the speed gun which was about 5 k faster than what Sid Kaul was bowling at in the same match. If we compare with Sid Kaul's usual speed , he clearly was in the mid 130s. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 41 minutes ago, Vickydev said: Just caught the highlights of the first innings, the wickets of Sanvir, Gurkeerat, Abhisek and Anmolpreet were all 128-129 ks on the speed gun which was about 5 k faster than what Sid Kaul was bowling at in the same match. If we compare with Sid Kaul's usual speed , he clearly was in the mid 130s. Just saw his 10-fer and he looks quite quick visibly. Certainly mid to high 130s, won't be surprised if he might touch 140 under proper speed guns. Link to comment
beetle Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, tweaker said: Against UP ,for which he played 2-3 seasons Didn't Sarfaraz play for UP? Which team does he play for now? Edited January 22, 2020 by beetle Link to comment
neel roy Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Bombay to UP.UP to Bombay back..apparently he was unsettled.. 6 minutes ago, beetle said: Which team does he play for now? beetle 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 3 hours ago, rkt.india said: Just saw his 10-fer and he looks quite quick visibly. Certainly mid to high 130s, won't be surprised if he might touch 140 under proper speed guns. Looked 125 k to 135 k to me visually, in FC atleast. Mosher 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 6 hours ago, express bowling said: Looked 125 k to 135 k to me visually, in FC atleast. Had seen him bowl up to 137 last year. Looks a bit quicker now. He bowled some quick bouncers in this game. Hurried the batsmen. Link to comment
tweaker Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 13 hours ago, neel roy said: Bombay to UP.UP to Bombay back..apparently he was unsettled.. Mumbai Link to comment
tweaker Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 16 hours ago, beetle said: Didn't Sarfaraz play for UP? Which team does he play for now? Mumbai beetle 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 If mumbai play to their full strength what a batting lineup it wud be jaiswal, shaw, tare, Rohit, rahane, Iyer, SKY, Dube, Sarfraz , Lad Vijy, tweaker and raki05 3 Link to comment
nsareen Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 hit 5 4’s in one over of pankaj jaiswal !!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
__89d1c160-7d80-4e30-b8c2-c98e20c77697.thumb.jpg.37e5beed09144d06934cae9e6c1504b7.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now