Jump to content

Hardik Pandya mega discussion thread

Ankit_sharma03

By Ankit_sharma03
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted

Guys upset that BD is not included because SDP is in top 5 do not even know that if BD is included SDP moves one place up  :facepalm:

 

View overall figures
Opposition team Afghanistan  or Australia  or Bangladesh  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies 
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2021 
Trophy ICC Men's T20 World Cup 
Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 50 

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

 

Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
Asif Ali (PAK) 4 3 2 52 27* 52.00 20 260.00 0 0 1 1 7  
MS Wade (AUS) 6 3 2 74 41* 74.00 45 164.44 0 0 0 6 4  
HH Pandya (INDIA) 3 3 1 69 35* 34.50 45 153.33 0 0 0 7 2  
KIC Asalanka (SL) 5 5 1 225 80* 56.25 147 153.06 0 2 0 22 9  
JC Buttler (ENG) 6 6 3 269 101* 89.66 178 151.12 1 1 0 22 13  
DA Warner (AUS) 6 6 1 236 89* 47.20 159 148.42 0 2 0 28 7  
AK Markram (SA) 5 5 2 162 52* 54.00 111 145.94 0 2 1 9 9  
MA Leask (SCOT) 5 5 1 77 42* 19.25 53 145.28 0 0 2 7 4  
DJ Mitchell (NZ) 4 4 1 165 72* 55.00 114 144.73 0 1 0 12 9  
Karim Janat (AFG) 3 3 1 59 42* 29.50 41 143.90 0 0 0 4 3  
PBB Rajapaksa (SL) 5 4 1 112 53 37.33 78 143.58 0 1 1 9 6  
MR Marsh (AUS) 5 4 1 108 53 36.00 76 142.10 0 1 0 11 4  
RG Sharma (INDIA) 3 3 0 88 74 29.33 62 141.93 0 1 1 9 4  
JJ Roy (ENG) 5 5 1 123 61 30.75 89 138.20 0 1 0 11 5  
MP Stoinis (AUS) 6 4 3 80 40* 80.00 58 137.93 0 0 1 7 3  
N Pooran (WI) 5 5 0 103 46 20.60 76 135.52 0 0 0 10 5  
MM Ali (ENG) 6 4 2 92 51* 46.00 70 131.42 0 1 0 6 4  
Fakhar Zaman (PAK) 4 3 1 96 55* 48.00 74 129.72 0 1 0 5 6  
E Lewis (WI) 5 5 0 105 56 21.00 81 129.62 0 1 0 11 7  
Najibullah Zadran (AFG) 3 3 0 106 73 35.33 82 129.26 0 1 0 9 5  
SO Hetmyer (WI) 5 5 1 127 81* 31.75 100 127.00 0 1 0 13 4  
RR Pant (INDIA) 3 3 1 78 39 39.00 62 125.80 0 0 0 3 5  
KL Rahul (INDIA) 3 3 0 90 69 30.00 72 125.00 0 1 0 9 2  
Mohammad Rizwan (PAK) 4 4 1 187 79* 62.33 151 123.84 0 2 0 15 7  
Mushfiqur Rahim (BAN) 5 5 1 95 57* 23.75 79 120.25 0 1 1 9 2  
DJ Malan (ENG) 6 5 1 116 41 29.00 97 119.58 0 0 0 12 2  
EJG Morgan (ENG) 6 4 2 68 40 34.00 57 119.29 0 0 0 5 3  
AJ Finch (AUS) 6 6 0 130 44 21.66 109 119.26 0 0 2 12 6  
P Nissanka (SL) 5 5 0 155 72 31.00 130 119.23 0 2 0 13 4  
HE van der Dussen (SA) 5 5 2 177 94* 59.00 152 116.44 0 1 0 10 6  
MDKJ Perera (SL) 5 5 0 79 35 15.80 68 116.17 0 0 0 7 2  
Babar Azam (PAK) 4 4 1 167 68* 55.66 144 115.97 0 2 0 16 2  
RD Berrington (SCOT) 5 5 1 76 54* 19.00 67 113.43 0 1 2 5 2  
DP Conway (NZ) 4 4 2 111 46 55.50 98 113.26 0 0 0 12 1  
MJ Guptill (NZ) 4 4 0 69 28 17.25 63 109.52 0 0 0 11 0  
T Bavuma (SA) 5 4 1 91 46 30.33 84 108.33 0 0 0 6 2  
M van Lingen (NAM) 4 4 0 54 25 13.50 50 108.00 0 0 0 5 2  
Gulbadin Naib (AFG) 3 3 1 68 35* 34.00 63 107.93 0 0 0 8 1  
Q de Kock (SA) 4 4 0 69 34 17.25 64 107.81 0 0 0 10 0  
HG Munsey (SCOT) 5 5 0 117 29 23.40 109 107.33 0 0 0 11 7  
KA Pollard (WI) 5 5 1 90 44 22.50 84 107.14 0 0 1 6 3  
D Wiese (NAM) 5 5 1 117 43* 29.25 110 106.36 0 0 0 8 3  
MD Shanaka (SL) 5 5 2 75 26 25.00 71 105.63 0 0 0 7 2  
Mohammad Naim (BAN) 5 5 0 110 62 22.00 105 104.76 0 1 0 12 0  
RR Hendricks (SA) 4 4 0 56 39 14.00 55 101.81 0 0 0 6 1  
CN Greaves (SCOT) 5 5 1 70 45 17.50 69 101.44 0 0 0 5 2  
V Kohli (INDIA) 3 2 0 66 57 33.00 66 100.00 0 1 0 5 1  
Mohammad Nabi (AFG) 3 3 1 84 35* 42.00 84 100.00 0 0 0 7 1  
Mahmudullah (BAN) 5 5 2 79 31* 26.33 80 98.75 0 0 0 7 1  
SPD Smith (AUS) 6 4 1 69 35 23.00 71 97.18 0 0 0 5 0  
Link to comment
Trichromatic Mentor

Trichromatic

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Because it could without the fear of losing chasing a low total versus a weak bowling side ...

 

Let me reiterate, SA had higher run rate than Aus against team you have listed down, yet Aus could be champion tomorrow, proving that matches against Bangladesh was certainly created difference.

Link to comment
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted
Just now, Trichromatic said:

 

Let me reiterate, SA had higher run rate than Aus against team you have listed down, yet Aus could be champion tomorrow, proving that matches against Bangladesh also mattered. 

 

Everyone knows there can be an upset too but that does not change which were the good teams were in the competition 

 

In 1996 WC, Kenya beat WI, do we take stats v Kenya for the tournament :lol: 

 

 

Link to comment
sarcastic Collaborator

sarcastic

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, zen said:

 

Everyone knows there can be an upset too but that does not change which were the good teams were in the competition 

 

In 1996 WC, Kenya beat WI, do we take stats v Kenya for the tournament :lol: 

 

 

What @Trichromatic is saying is that the performance against Bangladesh made the difference between SA or Aus qualifying for semis.

So, the team that performed better against a "minnow" team qualified vs a team that did not do that well against the same minnow.

So, how can performance against a "minnow" be unimportant, when that decided who qualifies for the next round (and probably the championship). 

There is no upset that happened here. Both Aus and SA are much better than Bangladesh and expected to win against them. One team defeated them in much more comprehensive way than the other. And even that mattered at the end to determine who qualifies and who does not. 


So, performance against Bangladesh (i.e. batsmen playing with higher S/R and/or bowlers taking wickets cheaply) also matters and hence should be considered as part of the stats.

Edited by sarcastic
Link to comment
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, sarcastic said:

What @Trichromatic is saying is that the performance of Bangladesh made the difference between SA or Aus qualifying for semis.

So, the team that performed better against a "minnow" team qualified vs a team that did not do that well against the same minnow.

So, how can performance against a "minnow" be unimportant, when that decided who qualifies for the next round (and probably the championship). 

There is no upset that happened here. Both Aus and SA are much better than Bangladesh and expected to win against them. One team defeated them in much more comprehensive way than the other. And even that mattered at the end to determine who qualifies and who does not. 


So, performance against Bangladesh (i.e. batsmen playing with higher S/R and/or bowlers taking wickets cheaply) also matters and hence should be considered as part of the stats.

 

Does not matter as it is common sense that no team is going to perform at a same level v other teams ... You can have a close game v team A, while team X could beat A comprehensively 

 

In 2007 WC, both BD and IRE made it to super 8 and created an upset in S8 too. A team playing bad cricket against a lesser team does not make that lesser team a strong team for other opponents.  

 

As for stats including BD, they are here too:

 

 

Ideally, one should only include the seeded teams. Only exception is SL, which played well. BD did not (Both BD and SL are unseeded). 

 

 

 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
Trichromatic Mentor

Trichromatic

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, zen said:

 

Does not matter as it is common sense that no team is going to perform at a same level v other teams ... You can have a close game v team A, while team X could beat A comprehensively 

 

In 2007 WC, both BD and IRE made it to super 8 and created an upset in S8 too. A team playing bad cricket against a lesser team does not make that lesser team a strong team for other opponents.  

 

As for stats including BD, they are here too:

 

 

Ideally, one should only include the seeded teams. Only exception is SL, which played well. BD did not (Both BD and SL are unseeded). 

 

 

 

 

 

Name 1 major team defeated by Afghanistan in a T20I series in last 10 years. 

Link to comment
Trichromatic Mentor

Trichromatic

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, zen said:


Why does that matter when the team is seeded and played good cricket in the T20 WC? 

It has done well v WI and BD (Yes)

 

 

A team doesn't become major overnight. 

 

Am I saying them to have beaten all team or to be best in world? 

 

If team is classified as major, then they would have some beaten major teams in recent times.

 

But parameter which you're applying is that Pandya scored against them so they must be major team. 

 

Which major teams has Afghanistan defeated in a series? 

 

Bangladesh defeated both Aus and NZ. 

 

If they aren't major team, then Afghanistan isn't either. As simple as that. 

 

This thread is nothing but a dishonest attempt to glorify Pandya's failures. 

 

Link to comment
Trichromatic Mentor

Trichromatic

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, zen said:


Why does that matter when the team is seeded and played good cricket in the T20 WC? 

It has done well v WI and BD (Yes)

 

Afghanistan didn't come close to beating any major team. Beaten comprehensively v India and NZ and just competed with Pakistan. 

 

Bangladesh lost only by 3 runs v WI and dominated match v SL. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...