Deepak chahar should be an automatic choice in playing XI in one dayers

[gakgupta]

I mean...the way he played in SA 3rd ODI is laudable ..

 

I think he has that zeal and attitude to do special in one dayers...

 

He is my bowling all-rounder and definetly ahead of shards in one dayers

 

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

No

[Majestic]

Ofcourse he should. He is the second best Indian all rounder of this era in LOIs.

 

Better than Shardul, Sundar, Axar and the other wannabe all rounders.

Edited February 6, 2022 by Majestic

[Lone Wolf]

Above Thakur 100%..  Similar batting skill but Chahar a better option with the ball.  Allows us to use him David Willey style in PP. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Chahar is at his best in t20 and their also he shudnt be automatic selection. Why ?? 

Automatic selection shud only be guys like bumrah, archer, shaheeh who are all condition n situation bowlers. Their are conditions that doesnt suit chahar , thakur which turns them into liabilities and their are some that suit them which turns them into assets. Pick them acc to conditions. Among indian bowlers only bumrah n siraj shud be automatic selection, rest horses for corses 

[Pollack]

2 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Ofcourse he should. He is the second best Indian all rounder of this era in LOIs.

 

Better than Shardul, Sundar, Axar and the other wannabe all rounders.

allrounder

 

Second best Indian allrounder of this era

 

 

[rkt.india]

In place of Shardul.

[Pollack]

Hardik Pandya is the only player close to being termed as an allrounder in terms of skills in both the department. And even he hasn't done much.

Shardul, Chahar are bowlers (mediocre as fcuk) who can bat a bit. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

6 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Above Thakur 100%..  Similar batting skill but Chahar a better option with the ball.  Allows us to use him David Willey style in PP. 

u hve way way way overestimated his batting ability

Thakur batting ability is higher then chahar

Willey to bhul hi jao

[Pollack]

1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

u hve way way way overestimated his batting ability

Thakur batting ability is higher then chahar

Willey to bhul hi jao

In ODIs/t20s Deepak will be more clutch as a batsman than Shardul. In tests Shardul should be better. This is based on my perception and analysis since neither of the players have played much to compare.

Bowling, both are sh!t bowlers. I am 100% sure about this. We are going to be screwed if we don't find better bowlers.

[Majestic]

17 minutes ago, Pollack said:

allrounder

 

Second best Indian allrounder of this era

 

 

Ofcourse he is. He can perform under pressure. Give him +5 for that. His 69 vs Lanka possessed all the skills of a finisher. He is peak Irfan Pathan with bat. Also has a beautiful wife.

 

After Pandya, he is the second best. Shardul is bits and pieces in LOIs like Jadeja.

 

Axar is much worse bat than all of them. Sundar is good but lacks hitting ability. 

Edited February 6, 2022 by Majestic

[jusarrived]

Agree the only half decent AR we have.  

Hooda is a cross batted slogger, sundar cant slog and Shradul is similar but I think chahar  is a slight upgrade both with ball and bat 

[Pollack]

1 minute ago, Majestic said:

Ofcourse he is. He can perform under pressure. Give him +5 for that.

 

After Pandya, he is the second best. Shardul is bits and pieces in LOIs like Jadeja.

 

Axar is much worse bat than all of them. Sundar is good but lacks hitting ability. 

Bro, we don't have genuine allrounders ATM. We should accept it till we find one. Pandya is the close we can get. 

[jusarrived]

I don't agree he should be an automatic pick, but if we have to pick one for AR spot, of all the pretenders he's the best 

[rkt.india]

18 minutes ago, Pollack said:

Hardik Pandya is the only player close to being termed as an allrounder in terms of skills in both the department. And even he hasn't done much.

Shardul, Chahar are bowlers (mediocre as fcuk) who can bat a bit. 

They are bowling alrounders but Chahar's bowling is better and is a decent bat at #8. Pandya is a batting alrounder capable of batting at 5-6 whose bowling is secondary skill. So both type of players can play simultaneously if they are good at their primary skill and decent at secondary skill.

[Ankit_sharma03]

10 minutes ago, Pollack said:

In ODIs/t20s Deepak will be more clutch as a batsman than Shardul. In tests Shardul should be better. This is based on my perception and analysis since neither of the players have played much to compare.

Bowling, both are sh!t bowlers. I am 100% sure about this. We are going to be screwed if we don't find better bowlers.

Acc to me thakur is better LOI batsman, infact ill choose him to bat at 7 instead of jaddu or axar . Chahar is more gritty whereas thakur is more free flowing

as bowlers

Chahar is very good in t20 , coz in 4 over u can bowl at full steam so his pace is fine their but in ODI in middle overs he starts to drop his pace. In t20 i consider him match winner coz on his days he can run through top orders n has done that a lot in IPL 

Thakur as bowler- needs longer grounds (like australia ) spungy pitches ( like UAE) or extra pace n bounce, that where he is very handy as bowler. U give him flat deck, small grounds....he ll leak leak n leak 

 

So both are just horses for courses.

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

5 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

I don't agree he should be an automatic pick, but if we have to pick one for AR spot, of all the pretenders he's the best 

 

9 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

Agree the only half decent AR we have.  

Hooda is a cross batted slogger, sundar cant slog and Shradul is similar but I think chahar  is a slight upgrade both with ball and bat 

they are not all rounders, thakur n chahar are bowlers who can bat , the word is bowling all rounder

[rkt.india]

15 minutes ago, Pollack said:

In ODIs/t20s Deepak will be more clutch as a batsman than Shardul. In tests Shardul should be better. This is based on my perception and analysis since neither of the players have played much to compare.

Bowling, both are sh!t bowlers. I am 100% sure about this. We are going to be screwed if we don't find better bowlers.

Yes that's because Shardul can hit the deck hard to get purchase out of the pitch.

[Majestic]

15 minutes ago, Pollack said:

Bro, we don't have genuine allrounders ATM. We should accept it till we find one. Pandya is the close we can get. 

There is only one true genuine all rounder in the history of game. That is Ian Botham. Rest all are either batting A/R or bowling A/R.  Hence, they all belong to the same group.

[Adamant]

Thakur is a better batsman than Chahar in all formats. 

Yes Chahal might be a better bowler as of now in lois  coz he obtains more lateral move earlier on, but then unlike Thakur he hasn't got the ability to take wickets in a bunch, but yeah still I would take Chahar the loi bowler  abive Thakur. 

 

As far as batting is concerned, I don't think their batting abilities are even in the same ballpark. 

 

Chahar isn't an allrounder, he is a Pravin Kumar level batsman who can play some clutch innings. 

 

Actually now that I think, he is the new Pravin Kumar, but faster.