Jump to content

Sarfaraz Khan


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Lord said:

 

They are using him very poorly. That he's still doing good enough is his quality

Had he bowled more, we would have won this match. Axar was garbage. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I don’t have any problem with any player . I just don’t think he is good as some people are making him  into, he is classic bits and pieces player.

After Ashwin he has place to play as a bowler and at number 6 or 7.If his bowling stinks he doesn’t have place in the team. It is that simple 

 

 In no world he is fit to be number 3. 

 

 

Definition of no. 3 has changed now. SA has Mulder at 3, Aus plays Green.

 

If he plays there long enough, we can know if he's suited. There's massive upside if it clicks

Posted
Just now, Gollum said:

Had he bowled more, we would have won this match. Axar was garbage. 

 

Yep. Dunno what GG/Pant were doing. Jaddu was already doing good enough SLA job. Needed an offie to complement him.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, putrevus said:

 In no world he is fit to be number 3. 

We have tried specialist bats like Vihari, Gill, Karun, Padikkal at #3. All failed. In fact since 2019 our #3 averages around 25, minnow level. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
Just now, Lord said:

 

Definition of no. 3 has changed now. SA has Mulder at 3, Aus plays Green.

 

If he plays there long enough, we can know if he's suited. There's massive upside if it clicks

No it has not changed, you want your number 3 to be one of your best batsmen.

 

The biggest blame for this loss goes to both Jurel and Sundar they both got starts and could not even rotate strike  putting pressure on tail .

 

Only one among the three ( Jurel, Sundar and Axar) needed to play.

 

 

Posted
Just now, putrevus said:

No it has not changed, you want your number 3 to be one of your best batsmen.

 

The biggest blame for this loss goes to both Jurel and Sundar they both got starts and could not even rotate strike  putting pressure on tail .

 

Only one among the three ( Jurel, Sundar and Axar) needed to play.

 

 

 

So Mulder is one of the best batsmen of SA?

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

No it has not changed, you want your number 3 to be one of your best batsmen.

 

The biggest blame for this loss goes to both Jurel and Sundar they both got starts and could not even rotate strike  putting pressure on tail .

 

Only one among the three ( Jurel, Sundar and Axar) needed to play.

Even Bavuma was damn slow. Failure is on those who didn't make any mark, like Jaiswal, KL, Pant. had each of them scored 10 runs, we would have won. 

Posted
Just now, Gollum said:

We have tried specialist bats like Vihari, Gill, Karun, Padikkal at #3. All failed. In fact since 2019 our #3 averages less than 25, minnow level. 

You keep trying, India doesn’t lack batsmen that they need to play this guy at number 3.  

 

He simply does not belong there IMO. I would be shocked if he succeeded at number 3.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

So Mulder is one of the best batsmen of SA?

Just because they are playing, you don’t have to play.They have Maharaj at number 11 does it mean we  have to do the same.

Posted
26 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

First he says "long levers", then he says he looks like Bavuma. :hmmmm2:

 

Different context. 

Posted
11 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

First he says "long levers", then he says he looks like Bavuma. :hmmmm2:

 

Yea lol but he talks about it separately.  Bavuma waited to play right under his eye. That is why he looked good.  Kela is the only one who does that in our team. But he has this habit of chasing a ball.

Posted

 Against Jammu & Kashmir

1st innings - 42

2nd innings - 32

 

Against Chhattisgarh

1st innings - 1

2nd innings - DNB

 

Against Rajasthan

1st innings -  15

2nd innings - 19* 

 

Against Himachal Pradesh

1st innings - 16

2nd innings - Yet to bat

 

Against Puducherry

1st innings - 67

2nd innings - Yet to bat

Posted
19 hours ago, Gollum said:

Even Bavuma was damn slow. Failure is on those who didn't make any mark, like Jaiswal, KL, Pant. had each of them scored 10 runs, we would have won. 

First blame goes to Coach for packing team which is so unbalanced , batsmen get out cheap all the time that is why you have multiple batsmen.

 

Sundar and Jurel got starts they let pressure build on them and got out.Bavuma did not that is the difference.

 

Why they got out is simple, they never should have batted at number 3 and 4. They are not number 3 and 4.

Posted

Sarfaraz should have played the home series against Windies and SA.

 

Gambhir has made a mess filling the Playing 11 with allrounders and wicket keepers 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...