Jump to content

Why are we trying to bring back Trundler Culture in Indian cricket again  ??  Our pace bowling revolution started with the pace and bounce of Bumrah and Shami.and the height of Ishant.


Recommended Posts

OP, we are bringing back trundler culture for the same reason that our batting core remains stagnant and has proven non-performers like KL and DK taking up slots. there is no vision, no accountability, no management, and no sense. add to that the fact this generation of "talents" have merely a fraction of talent compared to not just the 90s/00s folks but also those in the 2010s.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Vijy said:

OP, we are bringing back trundler culture for the same reason that our batting core remains stagnant and has proven non-performers like KL and DK taking up slots. there is no vision, no accountability, no management, and no sense. add to that the fact this generation of "talents" have merely a fraction of talent compared to not just the 90s/00s folks but also those in the 2010s.

 

 

Agree with the rest but the fast bowling talents in India are far more frequently available nowadays than earlier.

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
Just now, express bowling said:

 

 

Agree with the rest but the fast bowling talent in India is far more frequently available nowadays than earlier.

I don't think we have an attack that can be as potent as the following: Shami, Bumrah, peak Bhuvi (in swinging conditions), peak Umesh (in SC conditions), and Lambu.

 

Of course, we have not tried most of the newbies, so I am aware that the above statement can be wrong

Link to comment
Just now, Vijy said:

I don't think we have an attack that can be as potent as the following: Shami, Bumrah, peak Bhuvi (in swinging conditions), peak Umesh (in SC conditions), and Lambu.

 

Of course, we have not tried most of the newbies, so I am aware that the above statement can be wrong

Barring Bumrah all took their time to become what they are today

Umesh,Ishant only started looking good from 2016/17 in red ball

Arun needs the credit here, actually he put emphasis on importance of pace in tests and understood if we were to win test matches at home/abroad we need to select prefer pace ,Umesh Aaron so be it, unfortunately Aaron got injured in 2015 and then came Bumrah

Had Aaron been there alongside Arun,he too would have transformed into a good red ball bowler atleast like Umesh and Ishant(who also played county)

Link to comment
Just now, Suhaan said:

Barring Bumrah all took their time to become what they are today

Umesh,Ishant only started looking good from 2016/17 in red ball

Arun needs the credit here, actually he put emphasis on importance of pace in tests and understood if we were to win test matches at home/abroad we need to select prefer pace ,Umesh Aaron so be it, unfortunately Aaron got injured in 2015 and then came Bumrah

Had Aaron been there alongside Arun,he too would have transformed into a good red ball bowler atleast like Umesh and Ishant(who also played county)

and in the absence of arun? what we will probably see is lots of promising pacers lose their way, in which case they clearly can't be compared against their predecessors

Link to comment
25 minutes ago, Vijy said:

I don't think we have an attack that can be as potent as the following: Shami, Bumrah, peak Bhuvi (in swinging conditions), peak Umesh (in SC conditions), and Lambu.

 

Of course, we have not tried most of the newbies, so I am aware that the above statement can be wrong

 

Whether we have or not, only time will tell.

 

But the raw material available in the 2020s are much more than 1990s or 2000s.

 

That we are wasting that raw material  (  pace talent ) is the point of this thread.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Gambhir was asking ( implying ) whether Avesh has been told to bowl slower than he usually does.

 

Prasidh is definitely bowling slower for India than he does for his franchise. Same with Umran. 

 

There is cause to worry.

 

 

Dravid was called meek for a reason,he loves staying safe
He was rather innovative with U19,but with India he is scared of loosing and acting as a coward

What is the point of being defensive when you won't get opportunity to defend as opposition will thrash you to dust by exploiting your weakness ruthlessly?
Dravid,Chetan Sharma,Mahambrey a scary coincidence working together

 

 

 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Dravid was called meek for a reason,he loves staying safe
He was rather innovative with U19,but with India he is scared of loosing and acting as a coward

What is the point of being defensive when you won't get opportunity to defend as opposition will thrash you to dust by exploiting your weakness ruthlessly?
Dravid,Chetan Sharma,Mahambrey a scary coincidence working together

 

 

 


when you get the talent pool like we have at junior level and when there is no ego involved and all these kiddos are overwhelmed by you and fall in line, even you and I can coach.

 

Rahul though has an approachable personality. That works in his favor but he is too approachable and that’s a problem too

Link to comment

For all those going on about our trundler attack (not defending our bowling by the way), Pakistan's 3 out and out pace bowlers gave away 121 runs/3 wickets, our 3 pacers which includes Pandya gave away 111 runs/3 wickets.

It is not the pace per se but the match awareness, intelligence and nerves to produce the goods in tight situations that we seem to lack.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Swag said:

For all those going on about our trundler attack (not defending our bowling by the way), Pakistan's 3 out and out pace bowlers gave away 121 runs/3 wickets, our 3 pacers which includes Pandya gave away 111 runs/3 wickets.

It is not the pace per se but the match awareness, intelligence and nerves to produce the goods in tight situations that we seem to lack.

Their bowling collectively did well , plus they did well fielding wise 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Swag said:

For all those going on about our trundler attack (not defending our bowling by the way), Pakistan's 3 out and out pace bowlers gave away 121 runs/3 wickets, our 3 pacers which includes Pandya gave away 111 runs/3 wickets.

It is not the pace per se but the match awareness, intelligence and nerves to produce the goods in tight situations that we seem to lack.

 

 

Just pace is not enough.

 

Otber skills are needed with pace too.

 

But pace and bounce are needed too.

 

Pakistan is one extreme ... They will pick a quick bowler even if he lacks other skills.

 

India is the other extreme ... we totally ignore the need for pace if possible. 

 

The Australian or South African or Windies of 1975 to 1995 approach of ....  Pace + Bounce + Other skills is the way to go.

 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...