"Bowlers Weren't There": Rohit Sharma's Blunt Reply To Question On Mohali Loss

[AuxiliA]

1 hour ago, Adamant said:

You are taking that comment to a whole other topic.

 

 

Well you took this thread to a whole other topic. I wasn't the one who started it... 

[vvvslaxman]

5 hours ago, rkt.india said:

 

Ball is always going to sit up. His success relies on batsman not predicting or not being able to predict. Moment they achieve that it is free buffet.

[Jay]

Imo if you don't think shaheen is an ATG already then you dont understand cricket. He is a bonafide ATG already at a tender age of 24 allegedly. Superstar in the making. None of our bowlers can match him. Even dahani rauf are better than most of our bowlers. Naseem is as good as peak wasim. 

 

[rollingstoned]

2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Ball is always going to sit up. His success relies on batsman not predicting or not being able to predict. Moment they achieve that it is free buffet.

The dip he gets on his slower ball too. That is his biggest weapon. He at least acknowledged he needs to be a better 'conventional' bowler who can move the ball and have a reliable stock one which can dismiss batsmen who are not looking to attack him. 

[Lord]

22 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Ball is always going to sit up. His success relies on batsman not predicting or not being able to predict. Moment they achieve that it is free buffet.

 

That happens if its used as a surprise. If every 2nd delivery is slow one, batsmen are gonna set themselves up.

[vvvslaxman]

3 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

That happens if its used as a surprise. If every 2nd delivery is slow one, batsmen are gonna set themselves up.

 

All his variations are slower ones. Not full pace bouncers or yorkers.

[putrevus]

16 hours ago, Adamant said:

Muslim community produces Akram, younis, Imran, Akhtar, Shaheen in Pakistan and in India they give us Zaheer (33 avg), Khaleel, Avesh etc. 

 

 

Are you fricking serious. What the hell has religion got to do with players.